The reason man is self-conscious

[DEEZEDBRAH]

This is a fantastic breakdown as to approach anxiety, male self-consciousness, and female hypergamy.

I am a fan of RMG, Rich,and Rollo but, IMHO, they have a blind spot by dismissing RSD, Peterson, religion or the following as Hocus-Pocus. I found Rollo annoying during the collaboration with Elliot Hulse essentially dismissing his work under the sane pretense.

Herein lies male self-conscious. So this ancient story goes, a woman is sold a bill of goods by the serpent, that being, eating of the fruit will make you like God knowing good and evil. Following eating of this fruit, it is said, "their eyes were opened." It goes onto describe shame and being self conscious. Moreover, this is redundancy for Adam who feels this for a second time. You eat of a fruit, as if one could take action of some sort, and your eyes are opened.

What few recognized is that, Adam was already made to feel self conscious following Eve's emphasis on "being like God."


These stories are ancient and yet, it us the portrayal of female hypergamy which is probably as old as time. Its indicative of female nature. Its The reason why patriarchal societies existed. The counterbalance to hypergamy is younger women. Its nonexistent in the world today.

Options and the fear of loss is the reversal of female hypergamy. Its why Julian drama and indifference, alpha behavior, game etc counter women monkey branching.

Its just comical that the story of man and woman includes female nature, hypergamy, and the inherent discontent due to male burden of performance. In this case, Adams shortcomings being not God.

 

[Spaz]

You write good content Dee I give you credit for that.

From your various postings, it's reasonable to conclude that you have an above average intelligence.

Indulge me with your thoughts on this hypothetical question;

Hypergamy

If I were to ask you to make a short written explanation of what Hypergamy is for you, but then to remove the words; her, women, female, she or any word that's related to the female gender, and then replace those words with he, men, male, masculine etc.

What would it then portray ?

And from there, do you see what I see ?

 

[Alvafe]

This is a fantastic breakdown as to approach anxiety, male self-consciousness, and female hypergamy.

I am a fan of RMG, Rich,and Rollo but, IMHO, they have a blind spot by dismissing RSD, Peterson, religion or the following as Hocus-Pocus. I found Rollo annoying during the collaboration with Elliot Hulse essentially dismissing his work under the sane pretense.

Herein lies male self-conscious. So this ancient story goes, a woman is sold a bill of goods by the serpent, that being, eating of the fruit will make you like God knowing good and evil. Following eating of this fruit, it is said, "their eyes were opened." It goes onto describe shame and being self conscious. Moreover, this is redundancy for Adam who feels this for a second time. You eat of a fruit, as if one could take action of some sort, and your eyes are opened.

What few recognized is that, Adam was already made to feel self conscious following Eve's emphasis on "being like God."


These stories are ancient and yet, it us the portrayal of female hypergamy which is probably as old as time. Its indicative of female nature. Its The reason why patriarchal societies existed. The counterbalance to hypergamy is younger women. Its nonexistent in the world today.

Options and the fear of loss is the reversal of female hypergamy. Its why Julian drama and indifference, alpha behavior, game etc counter women monkey branching.

Its just comical that the story of man and woman includes female nature, hypergamy, and the inherent discontent due to male burden of performance. In this case, Adams shortcomings being not God.

some say its was the knowledge fruit when adamn did eat it he start to think and question things hence why he was banned, he started to question gob about what he was doing.

but don't forget, religion is a tool for mass control, and its was far easier having men control woman then religion control men, woman need men to survive, nowadays we have state for that hence that false sense of security most people have nowadays

 

[DEEZEDBRAH]

some say its was the knowledge fruit when adamn did eat it he start to think and question things hence why he was banned, he started to question gob about what he was doing.

No doubt. Its just interesting that the story emphasis is on, "being like God." This is/was Eve's 'true northm' again, which is indicative of female nature, hyoergamy, and why AWALT.

but don't forget, religion is a tool for mass control, and its was far easier having men control woman then religion control men, woman need men to survive, nowadays we have state for that hence that false sense of security most people have nowadays

"God is Dead" is a widely quoted statement by German philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche.

And how's that working out?

The destabilizing of society is based upon these core principles and values.

Its why when attempting to modernize fairy tales, you cannot but get the abysmal nonsense that is Frozen.

Even if not believing in a higher power, god, being, super consciousness etc something profound beyond self is humbling. Its lacking in 99% of women who make up this god complex with IG ass pics and cratering SMV. No rational thought, backward rational, forward thinking or anything but ego mania followed by victimhood. Its pimping oneself out as a commodity then water works when having missed the boat.


We'll experience a inversion. Sooner or later, the crash will come, and its then, people seek God.

For anybody seeking self knowledge or exploring consciousness, I cannot stress enough about "eyes opening." After a DMT trip, I can't stress enough about the unknown, chaos, and order.

There's a lack in beliefs, value, and its that death of God being replaced with consumerism or a God complex. Cratered smv pimped out.


Don't get it twisted. People seek God. Its just even more delusional now then ever in history. Strool through IG or twitter. Its that lack thereof. People are so lost.

 

[taiyuu_otoko]

Here's an angle to consider.

The bible starts with the garden of eden story. Humans had it good but women fvcked it up (and men followed right along). The moral of THAT story (garden of eden) is "we used to have it easy, but we disobeyed authority and now we've got to work for a living. So shut up and do what you're told"

But consider the idea that the story was filtered through generations, perhaps thousands of years of oral tradition, about what more or less REALLY happened.

Very early humans were hunter-gathers. Then foragers. During those times, they killed female babies, as they were risky. Perhaps they would eat more than they produced. Bad news in primitive times.

Then they arrived in the fertile crescent, where, after the ice age started to recede, foraging was super EASY. Just kick back and eat the fat of the land, literally.

But then the population got too big, and they had to WORK to get food out of the dirt to feed themselves.

I can see how oral tradition would place blame on the woman.

Women had too many kids, suddenly there was too many people, and that pretty much fvcked up everything.

So I can see how the storytellers a thousand years later would blame women for messing everything up.

All stories and mythology are essentially filtered through hundreds of years (at least) and try to explain what happened in the ancient past.

This meant that the storytellers had a lot of influence over the stories, as writing hadn't been invented.

As did all the people who remembered the stories from generation to generation.

 

[Alvafe]

Here's an angle to consider.

The bible starts with the garden of eden story. Humans had it good but women fvcked it up (and men followed right along). The moral of THAT story (garden of eden) is "we used to have it easy, but we disobeyed authority and now we've got to work for a living. So shut up and do what you're told"

But consider the idea that the story was filtered through generations, perhaps thousands of years of oral tradition, about what more or less REALLY happened.

Very early humans were hunter-gathers. Then foragers. During those times, they killed female babies, as they were risky. Perhaps they would eat more than they produced. Bad news in primitive times.

Then they arrived in the fertile crescent, where, after the ice age started to recede, foraging was super EASY. Just kick back and eat the fat of the land, literally.

But then the population got too big, and they had to WORK to get food out of the dirt to feed themselves.

I can see how oral tradition would place blame on the woman.

Women had too many kids, suddenly there was too many people, and that pretty much fvcked up everything.

So I can see how the storytellers a thousand years later would blame women for messing everything up.

All stories and mythology are essentially filtered through hundreds of years (at least) and try to explain what happened in the ancient past.

This meant that the storytellers had a lot of influence over the stories, as writing hadn't been invented.

As did all the people who remembered the stories from generation to generation.

you belive they killed children, with they didn't kids till middle age more or less had a pretty high chance to die, and we can even incur some otehr problems like wild animals and accidents, hell even a little broken bone would be fatal at that time, so even if a woman did pop a kid a year I doubt she had a lot of kids

No doubt. Its just interesting that the story emphasis is on, "being like God." This is/was Eve's 'true northm' again, which is indicative of female nature, hyoergamy, and why AWALT.



"God is Dead" is a widely quoted statement by German philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche.

And how's that working out?

The destabilizing of society is based upon these core principles and values.

Its why when attempting to modernize fairy tales, you cannot but get the abysmal nonsense that is Frozen.

Even if not believing in a higher power, god, being, super consciousness etc something profound beyond self is humbling. Its lacking in 99% of women who make up this god complex with IG ass pics and cratering SMV. No rational thought, backward rational, forward thinking or anything but ego mania followed by victimhood. Its pimping oneself out as a commodity then water works when having missed the boat.


We'll experience a inversion. Sooner or later, the crash will come, and its then, people seek God.

For anybody seeking self knowledge or exploring consciousness, I cannot stress enough about "eyes opening." After a DMT trip, I can't stress enough about the unknown, chaos, and order.

There's a lack in beliefs, value, and its that death of God being replaced with consumerism or a God complex. Cratered smv pimped out.


Don't get it twisted. People seek God. Its just even more delusional now then ever in history. Strool through IG or twitter. Its that lack thereof. People are so lost.

you think the only problem is lack of religion and guidances comming from it, with is not, the problem is always what we never think it is, wanting or not most people are not good, and what really hold then back was not religion was more social stigma, and of dead

 

[Roober]

I have actually found Rollo to be a bit narrow as well when I started listening to youtube videos and podcasts. I think his best work is behind him.

I actually have some thoughts on the rest too, just wanted to point that out.

 

[Augustus_McCrae]

This is a fantastic breakdown as to approach anxiety, male self-consciousness, and female hypergamy.

I am a fan of RMG, Rich,and Rollo but, IMHO, they have a blind spot by dismissing RSD, Peterson, religion or the following as Hocus-Pocus. I found Rollo annoying during the collaboration with Elliot Hulse essentially dismissing his work under the sane pretense.

Herein lies male self-conscious. So this ancient story goes, a woman is sold a bill of goods by the serpent, that being, eating of the fruit will make you like God knowing good and evil. Following eating of this fruit, it is said, "their eyes were opened." It goes onto describe shame and being self conscious. Moreover, this is redundancy for Adam who feels this for a second time. You eat of a fruit, as if one could take action of some sort, and your eyes are opened.

What few recognized is that, Adam was already made to feel self conscious following Eve's emphasis on "being like God."


These stories are ancient and yet, it us the portrayal of female hypergamy which is probably as old as time. Its indicative of female nature. Its The reason why patriarchal societies existed. The counterbalance to hypergamy is younger women. Its nonexistent in the world today.

Options and the fear of loss is the reversal of female hypergamy. Its why Julian drama and indifference, alpha behavior, game etc counter women monkey branching.

Its just comical that the story of man and woman includes female nature, hypergamy, and the inherent discontent due to male burden of performance. In this case, Adams shortcomings being not God.

If you’re saying that the men who wrote the Bible understood the true nature of women and that they understood that certain rules needed to be adhered to for the good of civilization and mankind, I agree.

Moreover, if you’re saying that they chose to codify those rules/laws under a wrapper of mysticism, for example: “The word of God”, to make them more effective, I also agree.

-Augustus-

 

[peanutbuttablunts]

Jordan Peterson is an absolute fool. I don't like calling out people as cucks, I think everyone has been through it, but his advice is tantamount to sticking with a girl who cheats on you. in the kingdom of ends (ie marriage) its categorically imperative that not a single law is broken, most especially never telling a lie.

 

[DEEZEDBRAH]

Here's an angle to consider.

The bible starts with the garden of eden story. Humans had it good but women fvcked it up (and men followed right along). The moral of THAT story (garden of eden) is "we used to have it easy, but we disobeyed authority and now we've got to work for a living. So shut up and do what you're told"

Hypergamy was the downfall even in the bible.

Coupled with "runaway theory," hypergamy is what sparks the dominance hierarchy. It could be argued, women are the reason for male competition at all levels.

But consider the idea that the story was filtered through generations, perhaps thousands of years of oral tradition, about what more or less REALLY happened.

Very early humans were hunter-gathers. Then foragers. During those times, they killed female babies, as they were risky. Perhaps they would eat more than they produced. Bad news in primitive times.

Then they arrived in the fertile crescent, where, after the ice age started to recede, foraging was super EASY. Just kick back and eat the fat of the land, literally.

But then the population got too big, and they had to WORK to get food out of the dirt to feed themselves.

I can see how oral tradition would place blame on the woman.

You're beginning to paint a victim narrative.

Women had too many kids, suddenly there was too many people, and that pretty much fvcked up everything.

So I can see how the storytellers a thousand years later would blame women for messing everything up.

All stories and mythology are essentially filtered through hundreds of years (at least) and try to explain what happened in the ancient past.

This meant that the storytellers had a lot of influence over the stories, as writing hadn't been invented.

As did all the people who remembered the stories from generation to generation.

You'remmissing the point.
For all the SJWs and feminist jargon of patriarchy, women ****kkk more (not less) violent men since the dawn of time.

Amplifier now being daddy government which foots the bill with the sweat of our brow. Beta thirst and chucks only fuel the fire, that being the cesspool dating market.

 

[DEEZEDBRAH]

you belive they killed children, with they didn't kids till middle age more or less had a pretty high chance to die, and we can even incur some otehr problems like wild animals and accidents, hell even a little broken bone would be fatal at that time, so even if a woman did pop a kid a year I doubt she had a lot of kids



you think the only problem is lack of religion and guidances comming from it, with is not, the problem is always what we never think it is, wanting or not most people are not good, and what really hold then back was not religion was more social stigma, and of dead

Awful sentence structure and grammar. No clue wtf any of that is.
Much smarter men described the fallout and Consequences of "God is dead."

The destruction of the nuclear family and removal of the father figure aids in female ego mania.

 

[DEEZEDBRAH]

Jordan Peterson is an absolute fool. I don't like calling out people as cucks, I think everyone has been through it, but his advice is tantamount to sticking with a girl who cheats on you. in the kingdom of ends (ie marriage) its categorically imperative that not a single law is broken, most especially never telling a lie.

No but you're brilliant. He's making 65k per month as a YouTuber, entrepreneurs, and selling out stadiums and your doing what?
He definitely teaches outside his expertise.


Source where he has ever suggested being a chuck otherwise stfu.

If guilty of anything, he's a trad con, and pedals monogamy O.Or engendered monogamy. If guilty of anything, he pushes back against Marxist everything is equal rubbish but, contradicts himself with respect to dating and pulling baeeees. Argues against the following if/when children are involved.AArgument was made on JRE podcast.

Learn to argue brah. This is about as bad as feminism and the wage gap lol

 

[peanutbuttablunts]

Have you not seen him cry on camera talking about the "tragedy" of the positive and negative forces of nature? Ugh, its obvious to me that his entire project was because he was cheated on...can you not read between lines? he more or less explicitly says it..
No need to defeat the straw man in your argument, but you're right about his position against Marxism, he has almost fascist tendencies when it comes to his fetishist illusions of monogamy#faceplam. yeah we should pressure women to stay in unhealthy relationships. GG

did you just say brah?

 

[DEEZEDBRAH]

Here we are today.
The redistribution of male resources to women all while skiing down cawkkkk mountain. Husbands being cucked. Other men signing up for their own willful cucking.

If you’re saying that the men who wrote the Bible understood the true nature of women and that they understood that certain rules needed to be adhered to for the good of civilization and mankind, I agree.

Moreover, if you’re saying that they chose to codify those rules/laws under a wrapper of mysticism, for example: “The word of God”, to make them more effective, I also agree.

-Augustus-

Gita 1.41 Adharmābhibhavāt kṛṣṇa
pradushyanti kulastriyah |
Strīṣu duṣtāsu vārṣnēya
jāyatē varṇasamkaraḥ

"Out of the corruption of women proceeds the corruption of races; out of the corruption of races, the loss of memory; out of the loss of memory, the loss of understanding, and out of this all evil."

Marriage is foolish for the following reasons. If you've read the Rational Male, the competitive advantage is TRP awareness and dating younger. Knowing of the epiphany phase and impending wall. A woman's solipsism keeps her in a blind spot until its too late.


Cratered SMV, single mom's, and low hanging fruit are what 99% of men call wife.

 

[DEEZEDBRAH]

Have you not seen him cry on camera talking about the "tragedy" of the positive and negative forces of nature? Ugh, its obvious to me that his entire project was because he was cheated on...can you not read between lines?
Conjecture. As I figured. Are you a male feminist?

No need to defeat the straw man in your argument, but you're right about his position against Marxism, he has almost fascist tendencies when it comes to his fetishist illusions of monogamy#faceplam. yeah we should pressure women to stay in unhealthy relationships. GG

did you just say brah?

No, we should pursue cratered SMV. Raise some man's baby.
You need your testosterone checked.

 

[peanutbuttablunts]

meh youre missing the point. sexuality is the ultimate horizon, the only thing that cannot be scientifically understood is "sex". the bible is amazing but the great thing about it is NOT marriage...xD...
equality is an amazing thing, you seem like a misogynist...that repels women and it repels love also.

 

[peanutbuttablunts]

we should pursue cratered smv....and raise another man's baby?

wtf are you talking about
never do either

 

[peanutbuttablunts]

Here we are today.
The redistribution of male resources to women all while skiing down cawkkkk mountain. Husbands being cucked. Other men signing up for their own willful cucking.



Gita 1.41 Adharmābhibhavāt kṛṣṇa
pradushyanti kulastriyah |
Strīṣu duṣtāsu vārṣnēya
jāyatē varṇasamkaraḥ

"Out of the corruption of women proceeds the corruption of races; out of the corruption of races, the loss of memory; out of the loss of memory, the loss of understanding, and out of this all evil."

Marriage is foolish for the following reasons. If you've read the Rational Male, the competitive advantage is TRP awareness and dating younger. Knowing of the epiphany phase and impending wall. A woman's solipsism keeps her in a blind spot until its too late.


Cratered SMV, single mom's, and low hanging fruit are what 99% of men call wife.

if you think marriage is so foolish then why are you pissed that women are getting to "ride down **** mountain"

embrace equality, win win....why do you NEED to be married to a woman to enjoy life? who hurt you

the redistribution of male resources??? what the **** dude its called society...women play a pivotal role in it and if you cant see that youre inept

 

[sosousage]

idk how can one relate bibles and religgions to women hypergamy

 

[Spaz]

You can always use the Koran or if you like, take one of the Egyption Gods.

I'm sure they'll be pleased.