Bonhomme
Master Don Juan
And having to struggle is a good thing?bigjohnson said:Why not struggle? Life has never been easy, STFU and lean your shoulder into it.
This country's lost its mind, like I said.
You made your case like a lawyer. Stable job. Good guy. Ready for something real. All true. All irrelevant.
She weighed your points, nodded along, felt nothing — then fell hard for some tattooed bartender with a motorcycle and a gambling problem.
Logic is where attraction goes to die. The "22 Rules" work a level deeper, on the subconscious switches that decide within minutes whether you register as a MAN or as part of the furniture.
Stop presenting evidence. Start flipping switches.
And having to struggle is a good thing?bigjohnson said:Why not struggle? Life has never been easy, STFU and lean your shoulder into it.
When a woman says it, guys hear a confession. A heads-up. A scheduling conflict.
Here's the translation: I don't feel anything. Right now. With you.
Watch what happens when a man triggers actual attraction. The busy career, the recent breakup, the "not in a place to date" — all of it evaporates instantly. The same woman who was guarding her freedom is suddenly free every night.
The "22 Rules" explain why. When the right switches flip, her timeline rearranges itself around you.
Bonhomme said:This country's lost its mind, like I said.
I'd say our point of disagreement is not so much what the minimum standard is, SmoothTalker, but whether or not it is provided.SmoothTalker said:No, we shouldn't let people starve or freeze to death, but beyond that, yes, some struggling is necessary.
Not to mention it's been proven that people have a lot less appreciation for something they didn't earn.
I think we both agree that there is a minumum standard that everyone should be provided with. We just don't agree on what that is.
I think everyone deserves food and a roof, and BASIC health care if they need it. Beyond that, it's whatever they get for themselves.
So, provide the BASICS of life, yes. Want more? Struggle for it.
I'm for providing bare minimum sustenance in return for public works. Unless a person is actually completely unable to work I'm OK with requiring either training or labor in exchange for the handouts they get. If they can't be bothered to at least put forth that level of effort then they're not hungry enough.SmoothTalker said:No, we shouldn't let people starve or freeze to death, but beyond that, yes, some struggling is necessary. There will always be scarcity, and by just giving out handouts, you're taking resources away from somewhere else.
Not to mention it's been proven that people have a lot less appreciation for something they didn't earn.
I think we both agree that there is a minumum standard that everyone should be provided with. We just don't agree on what that is.
That sentence contains at least five follow-up questions she WANTS you to ask. Where in Florida? What brought you here? How long have you been in the area? What do you miss? How does it compare to here?
She handed them to you on a silver platter. And you said, "Oh cool. I come here every week. I love this band. Ummm... pretty crowded tonight."
She smiled politely. Nodded. And never texted you back.
I was that guy for years. Talking too much. Listening too little. Panicking about my next sentence while she was literally feeding me the answers.
Then I found 22 rules that fixed the whole thing. Rule number one: shut up and listen. She'll tell you exactly what to say.
Have you ever worked someplace and the management and suckups really put the pressure on workers to not unionize and so it doesn't? It's happened everytime I experienced a union trying to come in. And from my experience the crappier the job the less likely the workers are willingly to stand up for themselves. Let me tell you from experience, the japanese tend to "own" and controller their workers.SmoothTalker said:By the way, the local paper had a story recently about yet another attempt to unionize the Toyota factory here. I haven't heard the results yet, but the general opinion was that the bid was going to be voted down. The story also mentioned that over the last 15 years there have been multiple attempts to unionize the plant, all of which have been rejected by the workers.
Now, since union working conditions are so great and Toyota is exploitive, practically sweatshop, minimum wage work, why the hell would workers reject attempts by various unions to unionize them time and time again?
I'd love to hear an explanation.