PeasantPlayer
Master Don Juan
- Joined
- Jun 20, 2013
- Messages
- 3,069
- Reaction score
- 946
Those are small sample sizes, not gonna workBeing short is not that bad (at least for dating) if you have a good face.
She asks it casually, mid-sip. And you feel the floor open up, because the honest answer is work, gym, and a couple shows you're half-watching.
Women rarely say this out loud, but a man with a life is attractive before he says a word. The guy who spent Saturday deep-sea fishing and came back with photos and a story — he walks in already interesting.
The "22 Rules" pushed me to build a life worth talking about. Turns out the fastest way to be interesting to women is to be interested in your own life first.
Those are small sample sizes, not gonna workBeing short is not that bad (at least for dating) if you have a good face.
You've said it a hundred times. Maybe a thousand. And every time you say it, you train your brain to freeze the next time she walks into the room.
Leagues are a myth invented by guys who are scared of women.
She's a person. She has bad breath in the morning. She picks songs she can't sing in the shower. She overthinks her own texts.
Walk over. Say something. The league dissolves the second you open your mouth.
Those are small sample size surveys not actual science. There's nothing empirical about what you posted.![]()
References
- 1. Case A., Paxson C., 2008a. Stature and status: height, ability: and labor market outcomes. Journal of Political Economy116, 499–532.
- 4. Heineck G. 2005. Up in the skies? The relationship between height and earnings in Germany. Labour, 19(3), 469–489.
- 5. Kortt M., Leigh A. 2010. Does size matter in Australia? Economic Record86(272), 71–83.
- 6. Dinda S., Gangopadhyay P.K., Chattopadhyay B.P., Saiyed H.N., Pal M. and Bharati P. 2006. Height, weight and earnings among coalminers in India. Economics and Human Biology, 4(3), 342–350. pmid:16377265
- 7. LaFave D., Thomas D. 2017. Height and Cognition at Work: Labor Market Productivity in a Low Income Setting, Economics and Human Biology25, 52–64. pmid:27843117
- 8. Schultz T.P. 2002. Wage gains associated with height as a form of health human capital. American Economic Review92(3), 349–453.
- 9. Sohn K. 2015. The height premium in Indonesia. Economics and Human Biology16, 1–15. pmid:24480546
- 10. Vogl TS. Height, skills, and labor market outcomes in Mexico. Journal of Development Economics. 2014 Mar 1;107:84–96.
- 11. Cinnirella, F., Winter, J., 2009. Size matters! Body height and labor market discrimination: A cross-European analysis. CESifo Working Paper No. 2733.
- 12. Hamstra M.R.W. 2014. ‘Big’ men: male leaders’ height positively relates to followers’ perception of charisma. Pers. Indiv. Diff. 56, 190–192.
- 13. Heineck G. 2009. Too tall to be smart: The relationship between height and cognitive abilities. Economics Letters105(1), 78–80.
- 14. von Hinke Kessler Scholder S., Smith G.D., Lawlor D.A., et al., 2013. Child height, health and human capital: evidence using genetic markers. European Economic Review57, 1–22. pmid:25673883
- 15. Persico N, Postlewaite A, Silverman D. The effect of adolescent experience on labor market outcomes: The case of height. Journal of Political Economy. 2004 Oct;112(5):1019–53.
- 16. Heckman J.J., Stixrud J., Urzua S. 2006. The Effects of Cognitive and Noncognitive Abilities on Labor Market Outcomes and Social Behavior. Journal of Labor Economics, 24(3), 411–482.
- 17. Walder A. 1995. Career mobility and the Communist pollical order. American Sociological Review60(3), 309–328.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
- There are 20 more but the doesnt allow me to post them all.
I've ran across some of your posts in this thread and noticed you offered nothing substantial to counter with. You've only dismissed everyone's arguments with "no it's not". I think those ppl arguing w/ you are taking you way more seriously than they should. What is even your point in this thread besides calling Meeks ugly or "nu uhing" ppl?Those are small sample size surveys not actual science. There's nothing empirical about what you posted.
So they took a "small sample" of people in different part of the world in different times and the outcome has been the same all the time.Those are small sample size surveys not actual science. There's nothing empirical about what you posted.
Most guys accidentally kill attraction before they even speak. They assume they need a bigger bank account, a better physique, or smoother lines. They miss the point.
Female desire operates on a specific set of psychological triggers. Break them, and you're invisible. Follow them, and you become magnetic.
I learned this the hard way. Years of freezing up. Getting friend-zoned. Watching other guys walk away with the girl I wanted. Then I discovered a set of 22 simple rules that rewired my entire approach.
But I thought it was all about game?This whole thread is for ppl who want to whine about who they are not and what they were born with. Why not just end it all and spare us all your silly tears? So your short fat and ugly. Who cares
The cope is off the charts. These guys wish they had a taste of the Meeks Pill. So much for game when you can nearly beat someone to death and have thousands of women donating to your prison account without you having to say a word.So they took a "small sample" of people in different part of the world in different times and the outcome has been the same all the time.
Guess thats the biggest coincidence ever existed in this world.
I agree because I've seen it first hand. A buddy of mine is only 5'7 and he often bragged that he could get any woman he wanted because of his handsome face. In school all the girls were after him and he could even walk into a strip club and pull strippers because of his brad pitt face. His eventual down fall was his blue pill nature (he wifed a stripper).Being short is not that bad (at least for dating) if you have a good face.
She calls you when her car breaks down. When she needs help moving. When some guy she's actually dating treats her badly.
You're the listener. The reliable one. The guy who would treat her so much better, if she'd just open her eyes.
She won't. You trained her to see you as the low-effort option — the friend who requires zero risk and zero investment. Every favor dug the hole deeper.
The "22 Rules" break the pattern. You'll stop auditioning for a role she already cast and become the man she chases instead. It starts with Rule 1.
Ugly men have 4 options: Luck out, rope, cope, or go Joker.Indeed..
Narcissism, in the absence of looks or money or accomplishments is just delusional cope.... it's nothing more than an extension of the "fake it till you make it" mentality......
A short guy cannot fake dominance without eventually getting checked by a taller more masculine guy.....
A socially awkward guy cannot fake "c0cky and funny" without coming off as cringe.....
An ugly cannot run "game" without looking foolish...
The post is not substantial in itself. It's a gimmicky youtube video for men mad at the worldI've ran across some of your posts in this thread and noticed you offered nothing substantial to counter with. You've only dismissed everyone's arguments with "no it's not". I think those ppl arguing w/ you are taking you way more seriously than they should. What is even your point in this thread besides calling Meeks ugly or "nu uhing" ppl?
Forget the cash, the cars, and the chiseled jawlines. Female desire operates on a completely different frequency. Primal. Subconscious. Triggers that bypass her logic and hit her on a gut level. Most guys are totally blind to them.
I know because I was one of them. The overthinking. The paralysis. The silent drive home kicking yourself for freezing up. Watching average guys walk away with the girl while you stood there stuck in your own head.
Then I decoded the psychology behind what actually makes women tick. 22 hard rules. Subtle behavioral shifts that rewired my entire reality. The anxiety evaporated. Women started leaning in. Investing. Chasing.