The "Average American Woman" is a 3/10 not a 5/10 if your using national weight averages as a guideline

[Identikit_Radiohead]

The average american woman is a whopping 171bs at 5ft4. That would make her a 3/10, not a 5/10. She's bordering obesity for christs sake! How is that a "mid" in attractiveness???

So why do you guys rate her a "5"? Fat men are not 5's either.

The average woman in Bangladesh is 122lbs, so they are all automatic 7+ are they??? I think not.

Please stop this nonsense.

 

[Bokanovsky]

The average american woman is a whopping 171bs at 5ft4. That would make her a 3/10, not a 5/10. She's bordering obesity for christs sake! How is that a "mid" in attractiveness???

So why do you guys rate her a "5"? Fat men are not 5's either.

The average woman in Bangladesh is 122lbs, so they are all automatic 7+ are they??? I think not.

Please stop this nonsense.

It depends on how you apply the 1-10 scale. I always thought that the scale was flexible and demographic-dependent, as opposed to being based on some arbitrary standards of female beauty. If the average woman in a Country A is a pretty 110 lbs blonde, that's your 5. If the average woman in Country B is a 400 lbs gorilla, she's also a 5.

 

[BaronOfHair]

So why do you guys rate her a "5"?

I don't. And the only folks who do are the sort of folks who are triggered by the following observations https://libcom.org/article/starship-stormtroopers-michael-moorcock , then continue to have standards which are beneath the crapper, for fear of being labeled "elitist"