Now isn't this just a fine example the pot calling the kettle black!iqqi said:Well you could just debate his actual points....
You made your case like a lawyer. Stable job. Good guy. Ready for something real. All true. All irrelevant.
She weighed your points, nodded along, felt nothing — then fell hard for some tattooed bartender with a motorcycle and a gambling problem.
Logic is where attraction goes to die. The "22 Rules" work a level deeper, on the subconscious switches that decide within minutes whether you register as a MAN or as part of the furniture.
Stop presenting evidence. Start flipping switches.
Now isn't this just a fine example the pot calling the kettle black!iqqi said:Well you could just debate his actual points....
Your buddy Dave has been single for three years and thinks "hey u up" is a valid strategy. Your other buddy Mike just got dumped and told you to "just be yourself."
You showed them her text. You asked them to decode the emoji. You drafted four responses and sent the screenshot to the group chat for a vote.
She's been waiting forty minutes.
Put the phone down. Stop crowdsourcing your love life. Type something that sounds like you. Hit send. Then go do literally anything else with your evening.
You are missing the essential point. It really isn't exactly looks. From my point of view it seems as if every woman has an idea, or ideas in her head as to how a man for her should be. Looks aren't necessarily what tips the balance. It is more that the guy fit into her lifestyle and expectations.ketostix said:So what you're saying is attraction happens fast and it's all based on looks. There's a lot of guys on here that believe that already, but even they know that getting attraction is only the proverbial foot in the door. In your FR you go from attraction right into romance novel. It never works like this for guys in the real world.
I have always debated you point for point. You are the one that responds with some version of "quit picking on poor little me" instead of actually responding. So don't even go there. Many don't even waste time on your threads anymore because of your inability to take or consider criticism. All your responses are either you being the victim of the iqqi click, or poor me I had a bad year.STR8UP said:Now isn't this just a fine example the pot calling the kettle black!
Hoo boy, if you are at all honest, you have to admit that's not true. Who says that he experiences females the way you do? No, not some guy in a movie or an AXE body spray commercial. What real guy says that he has experiences like yours? You can say that "everybody else is weird, and I'm the only normal one" until you're blue in the face, but you are the one who is not normal.potato said:What I'm saying is not outrageous at all.
I'm sure there are a few others here that would beg to differ. At least 50% of the halfway decent discussions we have get closed because of your pointless rambling.iqqi said:I have always debated you point for point.
You've replayed it a hundred times. She stood three feet away, scrolling her phone. You had an opening. You composed the perfect line — after she was gone.
For all you know, she's married now. To some guy who said something. Anything.
Openers are cheap. Almost any sentence works when it's delivered within three seconds. The expensive part is the standing there, drafting and deleting, while the window quietly closes.
The "22 Rules" stripped out my hesitation. What to open with, how to keep it alive, and the one habit that costs guys more women than anything else: waiting for perfect.
A gay transsexual undergoing hormone replacement treatment couldn't write like that.Phyzzle said:PS: I did find a male romance novelist on the net. He writes nothing like potato. Only females write like that.
I am sure there are a few others here who would disagree on the real reason why those threads are closed.STR8UP said:I'm sure there are a few others here that would beg to differ. At least 50% of the halfway decent discussions we have get closed because of your pointless rambling.
dont i know it.potato said:I think that it takes a women of high self esteem to openly express her emotions to a guy who turns her on. The low esteem women tend to to just turn away, shyly.
once a person has STEPPED UP, or shown that they can STEP UP then it becomes about the lifestyle and do you two mesh/ click. do you have fun together. are you equals or does one clearly OUTSHINE the other? you want what you yourself have. and you go on looking.potato said:It really isn't exactly looks. From my point of view it seems as if every woman has an idea, or ideas in her head as to how a man for her should be. Looks aren't necessarily what tips the balance. It is more that the guy fit into her lifestyle and expectations.
Ha ha ha ! Hey Choclo - you better translate that for the septics, digger. They would have Buckleys at grasping why you are on about.ElChoclo said:Fair suck of the saveloy Potato, it is a disgrace for a "bloke" your age to be writing this drivel for younger men. No mature man your age would be describing himself as cool. I maintain that you are some kind of poofter. So pull your head in you flaming mongrel.
Next Monday you'll feel more confident. After the gym you'll feel more confident. After one more drink you'll feel more confident. After you get a better haircut, a better jacket, a better job.
You've been "getting ready" for two years.
She's standing ten feet away right now. She'll be gone in four minutes. No amount of preparation will manufacture the courage that only comes from moving your feet.
Walk over. Stumble through the first sentence. Let it be clumsy. Let it be imperfect. You will feel more alive in those ten seconds than you have all month.
To quote the movie Eurotrip- "Wow, you guys are on a whole nother level of swearing!"jophil28 said:Ha ha ha ! Hey Choclo - you better translate that for the septics, digger. They would have Buckleys at grasping why you are on about.