In the history of the Christian church, synods, or councils, were convened to make determinations about which versions of their sacred stories would be officially sanctioned. The findings of these councils came to be known as the Canon.
Alongside such tasks as determining which books of the Old and New Testament were canonical, these councils also made theological determinations about things like the nature of Christ, and his relationship to God. One of the most important councils in the early Church was the First Council of Nicea in 325, sponsored by Emperor Constantine, who had just lifted the legal restrictions against the practice of Christianity. This was considered the first ecumenical, or world-wide, council since it included bishops from all major Christian communities of the time.
The pivotal decision of the Nicene Council affirmed the doctrine of trinitarianism, which states that God is of one substance, but exists in three persons (or hypostases) as the Father, Jesus, his son, and the Holy Spirit. This step was taken in reaction to an alternate interpretation of the story, Arianism, which stated that Jesus had been created by God, was not of the same essence, and was therefore somehow inferior...a prophet of sorts. The Nicene Creed was adopted by this council, and Arianism was ruled a heresy. Arian was exiled (and some say poisoned) by Constantine and his books destroyed. Subsequent church councils followed more or less this same pattern, and whenever they determined something to be part of the canon, they also included rules of punishment for violating teachings of the canon.
Jesus wasn't dumb...he foresaw that this would happen and once told a parable of a man who sowed his field with good quality seeds of wheat. But "while men were sleeping," an enemy sowed seeds that would produce weeds. Both types of seeds sprouted, and for a while the weeds hid the wheat from view. By this parable, Jesus showed that the fruitage of his work would be true Christians but that after his death, false Christians would infiltrate the congregation. Eventually, it would be difficult to distinguish the genuine from the false.
-- Matthew 13:24-30, 36-43.
The apostle Peter frankly warned of the effect of these weedlike "Christians" on the way people would view Christianity and the Bible. He warned: "There will also be false teachers among you. These very ones will quietly bring in destructive sects and will disown even the owner that bought them, bringing speedy destruction upon themselves. Furthermore, many will follow their acts of loose conduct, and on account of these the way of the truth will be spoken of abusively."
-- 2 Peter 2:1, 2.
Even during the first century, the prophecies of Jesus and Peter were being fulfilled. Ambitious men infiltrated the Christian congregation and sowed dissension. (2 Timothy 2:16-18; 2 Peter 2:21, 22; 3 John 9, 10) During the following two centuries, the purity of Bible truth was corrupted by Greek philosophy, and many mistakenly came to accept pagan doctrines as Bible truth.
So as stated earlier, it was during this time of ambition, dissension and worldly philosophy that the Bible, as we know it today, took shape. When we talk about the Bible "surviving" intact to our day, we really don't know if that is true or not. What if these 'apostates' got rid of books that they didn't like? What we have today in the form of the Bible is a direct result of 'apostate' action.
For example, although not included in the Hebrew versions of the Bible, the Apocrypha was included in a translation of the Hebrew texts into Greek made at Alexandria, Egypt, beginning in the 3rd century BC. This translation, popularly called the Septuagint because of the legend that it had been made by about 70 scholars, became the Bible of the early Christians before there were any New Testament writings.
In about AD 400, when St. Jerome made a Latin translation of the Hebrew Bible, he included the Apocryphal books (somewhat against his better judgment) because they had been in the Septuagint used by earlier Christians. These books thus found acceptance in both the Latin (Roman) and Greek churches. In the Bibles used in these churches, these books are found distributed throughout the Old Testament and are not considered Apocryphal as they are in Judaism, but as authoritative. Some modern editions of the Bible include these books as a separate section.
The books in this collection are: I and II Esdras, Tobit, Judith, Additions to the Book of Esther, Wisdom of Solomon, Ecclesiasticus (or the Wisdom of Jesus, son of Sirach), Baruch, Letter of Jeremiah, Song of the Three (or the Prayer of Azariah and Song of the Three Young Men), Daniel and Susanna, Bel and the Dragon, Prayer of Manasseh, and I and II Maccabees.
If your Bible does not contain these books, then the choices these 'apostates' made certainly greatly reduced the influence of the apocrypha in your life. Have you ever read the Book of Judith, for example?
How do you know that the Bible has really come down to us intact, since it depended on 'apostates' to collect and preserve it?
It was in Constantine's time that Christendom as we know it today began to take shape. From then on, the degenerate form of Christianity that had taken root was no longer just a religious organization. It was a part of the state, and its leaders played an important role in politics. Eventually, the apostate church used its political power in a way that was completely opposed to Bible Christianity.
This is the heart of our disagreement. You choose to trust these polticians to uphold the word of God. I think they played us all.
The bible is indeed the word of God, incomplete, totally censored and edited to suit the agendas of man. I believe it's up to us to use cultivate a real relationship with God to determine what is truth..
Bottom Line:
The way genuine Christians can be recognized was explained by Jesus himself: "By this all will know that you are my disciples, if you have love among yourselves." (John 13:35)
Notice he makes no mention of his divine status here. Strange, isn't it?
