952K views · 10K reactions | Basic Instinct Destroyed Sharon Stone’s Family #SharonStone #celebrity #movies | Life Stories
Basic Instinct Destroyed Sharon Stone’s Family #SharonStone #celebrity #movies
Dinner ran three hours. She laughed at everything. You walked her to her car thinking this one's locked in.
Then: nothing. Two texts. No reply. What happened?
You did what most men do on a great date. You filled every silence, answered every question, and left her with nothing to wonder about. No mystery. Nothing to sit with when she got home.
Rule 3 of the "22 Rules" changes the ending: tell her a little, hold back the rest, and let her imagination do the chasing. The ghosting stops too.
I could talk to any woman I wasn't attracted to. Charming, funny, relaxed. Then a gorgeous woman looked my way and I'd become a sweating, babbling mess.
The fix took me years to find and ten minutes to learn. Nervousness and excitement are the same physical state — pounding heart, adrenaline, flushed face. Your brain just picks the label. And you can pick a better one.
Rule 16 shows you how. You feel the nerves, relabel them as excitement, and let that energy pour out as enthusiasm. Women notice the guy radiating it. They always do.
Beyond that, we can start amassing widespread public support for policy reform by connecting these topics to the economy and crime control. Protracted litigation in family court costs taxpayers millions each year, and kids without fathers who are modeling pro-social behavior are 800 times more likely to become the gang bangers who are carjacking you in the CVS parking lotYeah, that’s a solid point. Framing it as an American family court issue instead of just a gendered one could make the conversation more productive. The system has flaws that affect both mothers and fathers depending on the situation, so pushing for broader reform around shared parenting might actually get more traction.
You asked her if she wanted to grab coffee. Then you asked if the time worked. Then you asked if the place was okay. Then you asked if she'd prefer tea.
Four questions. Four chances for her to say no. Four signals that you're terrified of making a decision.
Plan it. Pick the place. Pick the time. Tell her where to meet you. She'll either show up or she won't.
Either way, you look like a man instead of a scared little boy.
you have been through it I guess?Yeah, that’s a solid point. Framing it as an American family court issue instead of just a gendered one could make the conversation more productive. The system has flaws that affect both mothers and fathers depending on the situation, so pushing for broader reform around shared parenting might actually get more traction.
That, and "men's rights" are going to be an increasingly tough sell, in an ers where "human rights" themselves are proving increasingly untenable https://www.theguardian.com/news/2014/dec/04/-sp-case-against-human-rightsYeah, that’s a solid point. Framing it as an American family court issue instead of just a gendered one could make the conversation more productive. The system has flaws that affect both mothers and fathers depending on the situation, so pushing for broader reform around shared parenting might actually get more traction.