Look at your president: http://im.rediff.com/news/2013/aug/28putin.jpg Hahaha
You replay the conversation at 2 a.m. She texted back fast yesterday. Today, nothing. Was that smile friendly or flirty? What did the shoulder touch mean?
Every hour you spend decoding her signals drains your confidence and hands her the controls. Women can sense that insecurity from across the room — and it repels them.
One of the "22 Rules" kills the obsession on the spot: assume she likes you, and act accordingly. Sounds too simple. Works anyway.
Her interest tends to rise to meet your expectations. Psychologists call it a self-fulfilling prophecy.
Next Monday you'll feel more confident. After the gym you'll feel more confident. After one more drink you'll feel more confident. After you get a better haircut, a better jacket, a better job.
You've been "getting ready" for two years.
She's standing ten feet away right now. She'll be gone in four minutes. No amount of preparation will manufacture the courage that only comes from moving your feet.
Walk over. Stumble through the first sentence. Let it be clumsy. Let it be imperfect. You will feel more alive in those ten seconds than you have all month.
Barack ObamaI think that there's no doubt that as I see friends, families, children of gay couples who are thriving, you know, that has an impact on how I think about these issues.
Barack ObamaAnd we have done more in the two and a half years that I've been in here than the previous 43 Presidents to uphold that principle, whether it's ending 'don't ask, don't tell,' making sure that gay and lesbian partners can visit each other in hospitals, making sure that federal benefits can be provided to same-sex couples.
Barack Obama“what you're seeing is a profound recognition on the part of the American people that gays and lesbians and transgender persons are our brothers, our sisters, our children, our cousins, our friends, our co-workers, and that they've got to be treated like every other American. And I think that principle will win out.”
A lawyer who wants to support an illegal war. How ironic is that?bradd80 said:Personally, cant wait for the bombs to fall over Syria, tired of paying high gas prices just so these middle eastern dictators can live in the lap of luxury while their equally demented russian overlords support them.
bradd80 said:Which court of law has ruled it illegal?
Just because the Supreme Court of Malice thinks it's illegal, doesn't mean it is.
She calls you when her car breaks down. When she needs help moving. When some guy she's actually dating treats her badly.
You're the listener. The reliable one. The guy who would treat her so much better, if she'd just open her eyes.
She won't. You trained her to see you as the low-effort option — the friend who requires zero risk and zero investment. Every favor dug the hole deeper.
The "22 Rules" break the pattern. You'll stop auditioning for a role she already cast and become the man she chases instead. It starts with Rule 1.
That's cause your president will try and stick them in his mouth. You guys fight for more gay and women's rights, of course the world hates you.We will wreck anyone who opposes us, straight up. The whole world hates us but no one has the balls to stand up to us.
__________________
What the fvck did I just read?backseatjuan said:Russia is big and largely unpopulated, something like 1000 square kilometers per 1 human being.
+1 Rep! :crackup:BeDJ said:What the fvck did I just read?
Completely legal to spy on your own people and root through their private emails eh? US gov. never does anything illegal right?The only relevant opinion in deciding whether any acts of the U.S. president are illegal is the U.S. Supreme Court and its interpretation of the United States Constitution - not Malice or a magazine article or anyone else for that matter.
Give it up, lawyer. Obama himself said it would be illegal to start a war without congress approval.bradd80 said:So your proof that the upcoming war in Syria is illegal is some guy's opinion in a magazine article?
The only relevant opinion in deciding whether any acts of the U.S. president are illegal is the U.S. Supreme Court and its interpretation of the United States Constitution - not Malice or a magazine article or anyone else for that matter.
She calls you when her car breaks down. When she needs help moving. When some guy she's actually dating treats her badly.
You're the listener. The reliable one. The guy who would treat her so much better, if she'd just open her eyes.
She won't. You trained her to see you as the low-effort option — the friend who requires zero risk and zero investment. Every favor dug the hole deeper.
The "22 Rules" break the pattern. You'll stop auditioning for a role she already cast and become the man she chases instead. It starts with Rule 1.
It was not just Obamas opinion back in 2007. It's still his opinion. Why? Because it looks like there is not going to be a war with Syria. There never was going to be a war with Syria. Obama staged all of this because he knew the outcome would be no war. Just as I suspected, when he said he would "go to congress", he retreated from the war. He knew full well Congress would vote NO. Then he would be able to say he tried, and it will be the end of it.bradd80 said:Yes it would be legal in certain circumstances. Just because you don't like a certain government action, does not necessarily make it illegal. If surveillance could arguably be for national security purposes consistent with FISA and other federal statutes, then yes in fact it would be very legal indeed.
See malice, this is why IT specialists don't make any money arguing law.
Here I'll explain: for some contextual background, first bear in mind this interview reflects Obama's opinion way back in 2007, when he was trying to overthrow a previous U.S. president. Again, a politically influenced opinion in the lead up to an election six years ago does not provide conclusive proof that an act is illegal until the United States Supreme Court says it is.
Pay very careful attention to the entire interview, especially the part where Obama states "[h]istory has shown us time and again, however, that military action is most successful when it is authorized and supported by the Legislative branch. It is always preferable to have the informed consent of Congress prior to any military action."
In this last sentence you will find the truth: notice how the president says "it is always preferable to have the informed consent of Congress prior to any military action."
He did not state that it is required![]()
Britain sent poison gas chemicals to Assad: Proof that the UK delivered Sarin agent to Syrian regime for SIX years
British companies delivered sodium flouride to Syrian firm from 2004-2010
The chemical is a key component in manufacture of nerve gas
Sale has been blasted as 'grossly irresponsible' in light of chemical attacks
Intelligence expert says substance will have been diverted to regime
Can't remember the real name? Look it up you stupid *****! WTF are you talking about anyway?Watawata said:Omg it a conspiracy! The illuminati! Remember those guys who bought massively expensive nuclear safehouses (cant remember the real name ) or those guys who got armed to the teeth because of the suposed apocalypse in 2012? Yea thats some of you guys
Dinner ran three hours. She laughed at everything. You walked her to her car thinking this one's locked in.
Then: nothing. Two texts. No reply. What happened?
You did what most men do on a great date. You filled every silence, answered every question, and left her with nothing to wonder about. No mystery. Nothing to sit with when she got home.
Rule 3 of the "22 Rules" changes the ending: tell her a little, hold back the rest, and let her imagination do the chasing. The ghosting stops too.