Brother_Rapp
Banned
Is this worth discussion?
Hello Friend,
If this is your first visit to SoSuave, I would advise you to START HERE.
It will be the most efficient use of your time.
And you will learn everything you need to know to become a huge success with women.
Thank you for visiting and have a great day!
Oh, seeing as I "embarassed" him on a public forum I'm sure he thinks "kicking my a$$" would be justified.Originally posted by Giovanni Casanova
[/b][/b][/b]Sounds like you'd like to beat the everlasting sh*t out of her.
Would you like to beat the everlasting sh*t out of her, Brother Rapp?
Teach that woman some respect?
Keep her from popping off at the mouth at you?
Teach her to know her place?
[/B]
For once I think you might actually be right. :crackup:Originally posted by Giovanni Casanova
That's unfair.
He could very easily be both.
Affliction...come back and talk about this when you are a parent of two teenage boys. I have a 14 year old and 16 year old son. My 14 year old would laugh in the face of anyone attempting to lead him in the wrong direction. My 16 year old, however, is another story. He's a good kid but just last week he ended up in trouble for not knowing enough to walk away when his best friend decided it would be cool to take a bulldozer for a joy ride around the local sand pits. Some teenage boys are boneheads and don't think. Doesn't mean they are bad kids or won't grow into fine, upstanding men...but there ARE boys on here who could be affected badly by the wrong kind of advice. Anyone who denies that simply isn't thinking back to what it was like when they were teenagers.Originally posted by affliction
I didn't agree with Rapp's point of view, but I thought the thread interesting. I don't think his case was compelling enough to change anyone's opinion, so arguing that he was influencing impressionable teens is almost ridiculous.
Rapp, the thread was closed because a few select users on this site found the subject material offensive. That's all it is. Personally I would like to see these types of discussions allowed. I haven't ever hit a woman, and I doubt I would ever be in a position in my life where I would need to, but hot-button topics like this are always interesting to discuss.
And we have a few idiots who post here. The problem with Brother Rapp is that he writes fairly well and slips the inappropriate stuff in with stuff that sounds very similar to the typical advice given on this site. It's not like he is just straight out posting all blatantly offensive and inappropriate stuff. If that were the case then yes, no kid would pay him any mind. But that's not what he's doing...he is being underhanded about what he's advising...and THAT is why I have said what I did about his posts.Originally posted by SELF-MASTERY
Only idiots would be influenced by that post.
The issue was that you like to beat up women. That's what I attacked. I won't lose any sleep if that hurt your feelings.Originally posted by Brother_Rapp
Instead of attacking the issue on this thread you have sought to attack me. Attacking me will not resolve the issue. The issue was in the world long before I was born and will be here long after I go.
"If a woman embarrasses you in public, beat the sh*t out of her." How are you any better?Originally posted by Brother_Rapp
"If you see a gay guy, don't be gay just go beat up gay people."? Is that it? "Don't vote for women's rights, just shoot the politicians that vote against you."
You are setting a piss poor example as a debater.
i didnt agree with the topic of the thread.Originally posted by Brother_Rapp
penkitten
Giovanni Casanova
I can not understand the problem that you two have with me. I have did my best to not confront either one of you in some stupid ass game of who can piss the furthest.