“The 22 Rules That Turned Me From Invisible to Irresistible With Women… Starting Tonight”

You can skip the expensive cars, the fancy clothes, and the endless gym selfies. Completely unnecessary.

I used to freeze the second a beautiful woman looked my way. Frustrated. Awkward. Watching other guys walk away with the girl while I stood there tongue-tied.

Then I discovered 22 simple rules that rewired my entire dating life. The anxiety vanished. Conversations flowed effortlessly. Women started chasing me for a change.

These rules trigger a woman's subconscious attraction switches. And you can start using them tonight.

Read more...

Red pill "math"

mrgoodstuff

Master Don Juan
Joined
Aug 27, 2015
Messages
17,586
Reaction score
11,948
Location
DFW, TX
What's better?

1. Single mom, she's a 7, has had 7 boyfriends and one husband. She's 34 years old. Her shortest relationship was 6 months. She has a good job making $80k/yr but one kid.

2. Never married never LTR girl. She's 31. Had sex 500 times. Never gets hung up on a guy. So most are one night standers. Several hit 5 or so times. 200 guys. She's a 9 for appearance but makes $35k/yr.
 

Just because a woman listens to you and acts interested in what you say doesn't mean she really is. She might just be acting polite, while silently wishing that the date would hurry up and end, or that you would go away... and never come back.

Quote taken from The SoSuave Guide to Women and Dating, which you can read for FREE.

mrgoodstuff

Master Don Juan
Joined
Aug 27, 2015
Messages
17,586
Reaction score
11,948
Location
DFW, TX
My personal opinion is neither. At the same time, there isn't enough information for me to make a decision.
If I wanted a GF the single mom would be better. She's proven she can stay with a guy and has more $ so she doesn't need mines.

If I wanted a plate or someone who wouldn't be hanging on me the around the way girl would be better.
 

Vantagepoint34

Master Don Juan
Joined
Nov 16, 2011
Messages
889
Reaction score
76
Location
Land of slow.
What's better?

1. Single mom, she's a 7, has had 7 boyfriends and one husband. She's 34 years old. Her shortest relationship was 6 months. She has a good job making $80k/yr but one kid.

2. Never married never LTR girl. She's 31. Had sex 500 times. Never gets hung up on a guy. So most are one night standers. Several hit 5 or so times. 200 guys. She's a 9 for appearance but makes $35k/yr.

It seems like the first profile is hard to find. Like a needle in a hay stack. When it comes to the first sixty days you'll probably never see her again. No matter what you do.

On the second like something out of the movie Die hard where it's the bad guy interested. You could say she's an expert. How does the original die hard end??
 

mrgoodstuff

Master Don Juan
Joined
Aug 27, 2015
Messages
17,586
Reaction score
11,948
Location
DFW, TX
It seems like the first profile is hard to find. Like a needle in a hay stack. When it comes to the first sixty days you'll probably never see her again. No matter what you do.

On the second like something out of the movie Die hard where it's the bad guy interested. You could say she's an expert. How does the original die hard end??
What if #1 had more sex?

Ie: she fvcked her husband 1000 times over a 5 years period.

And she fvcked her 7 boyfriend's about 100 times a year, each over a one year period. She was always only with one guy.

So 1,700 fvcks in 7 guys versus the 550 fvcks on 215 guys?
 

What happens, IN HER MIND, is that she comes to see you as WORTHLESS simply because she hasn't had to INVEST anything in you in order to get you or to keep you.

You were an interesting diversion while she had nothing else to do. But now that someone a little more valuable has come along, someone who expects her to treat him very well, she'll have no problem at all dropping you or demoting you to lowly "friendship" status.

Quote taken from The SoSuave Guide to Women and Dating, which you can read for FREE.

mrgoodstuff

Master Don Juan
Joined
Aug 27, 2015
Messages
17,586
Reaction score
11,948
Location
DFW, TX
Both are damaged garbage. Fvck n' toss material.
Someone with basically 8 long term boyfriend's over a 12 year period of time is trash? I don't agree.

With #2 you can guarantee she'll be looking around and possibly hopping on other sticks.

#1 has a history of being with one guy at a time and putting out.
 

Mr Wright

Master Don Juan
Joined
Jan 19, 2010
Messages
980
Reaction score
243
Location
London, UK
Lol do guys actually think about this? Personally my only issue is that I don't date women with kids and since I'm more emotionally unavailable than most women, I wouldn't go near either. Gun to my head though I'd choose the second girl, it sounds like you could have some fun with her.
 

Vantagepoint34

Master Don Juan
Joined
Nov 16, 2011
Messages
889
Reaction score
76
Location
Land of slow.
What if #1 had more sex?

Ie: she fvcked her husband 1000 times over a 5 years period.

And she fvcked her 7 boyfriend's about 100 times a year, each over a one year period. She was always only with one guy.

So 1,700 fvcks in 7 guys versus the 550 fvcks on 215 guys?

Look man you're either a politician from greece named Hera. Which is the only record of here. Or a random Hittite group of girls that were trying to kill a bodybuilder in history who would train with a cow that he would pick up every day. Giving him reputation of a God. Currently if you can manage second is better...
 

mrgoodstuff

Master Don Juan
Joined
Aug 27, 2015
Messages
17,586
Reaction score
11,948
Location
DFW, TX
Look man you're either a politician from greece named Hera. Which is the only record of here. Or a random Hittite group of girls that were trying to kill a bodybuilder in history who would train with a cow that he would pick up every day. Giving him reputation of a God. Currently if you can manage second is better...
I think first is better. I like to "connect" in sex and don't like it to be transactional and impersonal.

#2 has over two hundred guys in her. Very non discriminatory. A history of riding the carousel, being able to control her feelings not get involved. It makes for shallower less feeling sex and alot more games if you try to get close.
 

Vantagepoint34

Master Don Juan
Joined
Nov 16, 2011
Messages
889
Reaction score
76
Location
Land of slow.
I think first is better. I like to "connect" in sex and don't like it to be transactional and impersonal.

#2 has over two hundred guys in her. Very non discriminatory. A history of riding the carousel, being able to control her feelings not get involved. It makes for shallower less feeling sex and alot more games if you try to get close.



When I was younger would agree. Going with the girl that has kids. There is an art. Bottom line as I've gotten older it's a question of time. If you look at the movie die hard. That type of free spirited girl is nice feel. Have you seen recent divorcee married to Johnny Depp. She was a real nice girl when growing up. Now she's into all the wrong things and no kids.
 

mrgoodstuff

Master Don Juan
Joined
Aug 27, 2015
Messages
17,586
Reaction score
11,948
Location
DFW, TX
When I was younger would agree. Going with the girl that has kids. There is an art. Bottom line as I've gotten older it's a question of time. If you look at the movie die hard. That type of free spirited girl is nice feel. Have you seen recent divorcee married to Johnny Depp. She was a real nice girl when growing up. Now she's into all the wrong things and no kids.
They get like porcupines. Better and better at keeping distance.
 
Top