Hello Friend,
If this is your first visit to SoSuave, I would advise you to START HERE.
It will be the most efficient use of your time.
And you will learn everything you need to know to become a huge success with women.
Thank you for visiting and have a great day!
She was great, all the women get run off the forum eventually, I hope you stick around and ignore the attacks.Lol that's funny. I'm familiar with @sazc but wasn't with @AJ84 so just did a search.
I'm flattered by the comparison, @AJ84 especially as the posts I read were insightful and pretty hilarious (in a good way).
Sounded like she had/has a great sense of humor and able to poke fun at herself which is definitely me as well!!
Thanks!
The mere fact they are on SS in the first place means they are not representative of women on a whole. Most women would find this to be a disgusting place because of all of the "toxic masculinity" going around. No woman can ever be red-pilled IMO, but I do think BeExcellent and Catsmeow are red-pill aware and therefore aren't going to give answers that are representative of most women on many topics - but especially on those dealing with relationships with men.
All true. I do find both their contributions meaningful even when I don’t agree with them. I agree that women can be red-pill aware but not fully red pill.
Red pill aware women still push the female mating imperative. Example being @catsmeow hypocrisy when it comes to accepting that men are not sexually monogamous.
I don't think "toxic masculinity" exists at all. I think it is a woke buzz phrase that feminist society/media push to emasculate men from their more primal instincts (especially when it comes to leadership within a male-female relationship) -- hence my comment most women would feel it exists here. I agree it doesn't exist here - or anywhere for that matter.
so basically women are not always on the lookout for something better
You are right in that women who hang out on SS are not representative of a "typical" woman (if there is such a thing these days). However, even if they were representative, their answers would not be reliable. Women have a hard time admitting personally flaws, even in an anonymous setting. Take BeExcellent, for example. She is something of a cross between Mother Teresa, Elizabeth Taylor and Princess Diana. Glamorous, generous, sophisticated, elite, independent and, well, excellent in every way (in her no doubt unbiased and objective self-assessment anyway.)
She's not "brilliant". She just makes stuff up. Her SS "persona" is 100% fake (as should be obvious to anyone with an IQ of above 70). I am actually amazed that so many people take her posts seriously. On second thought, perhaps I shouldn't be amazed.
that is the thing with most people on public forums , most of them are full of sh1t or just trolls
guys do not like you because you just show them that they are the biggest problem , not the women
It's your communication style. Less solipsism and more succinctness would go a long way. It might be helpful to ask yourself "how does what I'm about to write relate to the forum and the topic at hand?" more often, and "how does this topic relate to me?" less often. In the past, it has seemed like you're thinking aloud *as* you post, rather than *before* you post.
Yes.
This ^ is an example. How is it helpful to the forum to request a member to go dig through your posts?
Oh that's real in her own head alright. I like the line "many have a sense of entitlement to do as they please". Higher perceived SMV perhaps? It's good any resultant stinging from that doesn't resonate in every post this person makes.
No. I've been asked out by extremely wealthy men. I've dated extremely wealthy men too. Many feel a sense of entitlement to do as they please, including cheat. Nope. Pass.
I drive a very expensive car, collect art, buy whatever jewelry I happen to like, ditto shoes, bags, clothes etc., I eat at high end restaurants and own income real estate. I am financially independent.
I value character, loyalty, and compatibility. What you suggest is not something that interests me. There are many women who do look the other way if they are "kept" women. And most often they are deeply unhappy. No thanks. Life is too short for being unhappy. My self worth and self esteem is too valuable to sacrifice. I enjoy having a partner in life, in adventure, in mischief at times, and I value intimacy and depth.
So a man like you propose holds zero value for me. I have all the "stuff" I need. I'd rather have a loyal companion. Oh yeah. I do
Cheers
Men are extremely thirsty, even a good portion of wealthy men. There are plenty of higher income/higher net worth men who lead their interactions with money. I can imagine some of those more affluent men expressing interest in a woman such as @BeExcellent if her looks are on the level she claims. They might even be thinking with their penises and ignore the fact that she still has 2 children living at home and at one time had 3 children living at home. One would think that an affluent man would only seek childless women because that's what he can get with his money. I could see a 55+ affluent man going for a woman whose kids were all over age 18. However, dating women with adult children is often a pain too but not as annoying as the woman whose children are still minors.
If we ban women, are we also going to ban all of the black pillers who are here who also do not add anything? The problem is that is a very subjective view. You start banning people (categorically) and you are on a very slipper slope.
It also depends if we are talking just sleeping with a woman vs. a LTR. Many men are automatically going to rule out an LTR with a woman who is older than them just out of principle. However, most men, if they think they can smash, will still make a play and pursue a woman who is slightly older than them if the older woman is still good looking.
All true. If you're top tier enough, you might even be able to openly set up a harem where you are fuccking other women and your 2-3 women are exclusive with you. Most men do open relationships the wrong way though so I don't recommend that path. Most men who do open relationships end up getting less extra-relational sex than the woman.
I am one of those men who rules out an LTR with a woman who is older just out of principle. I also have a "no single moms, no exceptions" policy for LTRs as well.
