Prostitution is not legal because:

[SXS]

Well humans by nature do not allow trade to be "FREE" ever.. they always try to tamper with the market directly or indirectly for their own gain and to capitalize on the weak..

That is something socialists like to do.

We need a balanced system not capitalism not socialism , something in the middle..

Every country has something in the middle. Nobody lives in a minimum state with 0% of government and nobody lives in a place where the government do everything(even if it claims to).
I think those guys who complaim about capitalism miss the old times of feudalism or slavery...

 

[Luminescence]

Nothing new..... Women have always been used as tools to manipulate men for society. http://www.spartacus.schoolnet.co.uk/FWWfeather.htm

 

[omkara]

women crave it more but since they are having it offered to them all the time its not a big deal to them .. they learn early in life that they can get sex anytime they want so they change the game by deciding they only want it from certain men etc. they realize that most men are not that lucky and are willing to trade goods and cervices for sex causing the penis to have a lower value than the vagina

That's exactly right. But this raises the question of, since women and men have about an equal number of sexual interactions, who are the women having sex with? It's not possible that women just "get more sex than men." The only answer that I can figure out is that it comes down to hypergamy. Women tend to want to sleep with only the top 10% of men. Even if they are fat or average-looking, they still want that alpha, top guy. But in order to sleep with that top, alpha guy that all women want, they will have to share him. He is banging like 10 other girls just because he can... unless he happens to be a moralistic person. If girls want a monogamous relationship then they have to think more realistically.

 

[piranha45]

to summarize omkara's point, and to state it the way I learned it:

"10% of the men do 90% of the fvcking"

 

[DonGorgon]

to summarize omkara's point, and to state it the way I learned it:

"10% of the men do 90% of the fvcking"

True i have been saying that for a looooong time// its true.. And the messed up part is high level men will still F a below average woman but a below average woman still has high standards..

 

[DonGorgon]

LOL.. some AFC fool cried to the mods and got the thread moved..lol

 

[edger]

LOL.. some AFC fool cried to the mods and got the thread moved..lol

Lol, is that what happened, or are you guessing? I thought one of the mods wanted to do it because they didn't favor the thread. Who gives a f*ck what anyone thinks around here. I love beautiful high caliber prostitutes, and will continue messing around with them for as long as I need to. The game is extremely tough(even when you are good-looking and have better game than most guys), I'm not "getting any" at the moment, so I'm gonna do what I gotta do to stay sane. Like I said too, even if I was getting it from mulitiples of different women on a regular basis, I'd still be messing around with prostitutes. I'm on a mission to bust my load on as many HOT women as possible. I LOVE variety.

We only live once, might as well enjoy life and live it to the fullest while you can. It sure would suck to die undersexed(like a lot of guys die) and having not "gotten it all out of your system", thinking of how much you missed out on, knowing you could have easily taken advantage of the services of HOT healthy prostitutes.

 

[DonGorgon]

Lol, is that what happened, or are you guessing? I thought one of the mods wanted to do it because they didn't favor the thread. Who gives a f*ck what anyone thinks around here. I love beautiful high caliber prostitutes, and will continue messing around with them for as long as I need to. The game is extremely tough(even when you are good-looking and have better game than most guys), I'm not "getting any" at the moment, so I'm gonna do what I gotta do to stay sane. Like I said too, even if I was getting it from mulitiples of different women on a regular basis, I'd still be messing around with prostitutes. I'm on a mission to bust my load on as many HOT women as possible. I LOVE variety.

We only live once, might as well enjoy life and live it to the fullest while you can. It sure would suck to die undersexed(like a lot of guys die) and having not "gotten it all out of your system", thinking of how much you missed out on, knowing you could have easily taken advantage of the services of HOT healthy prostitutes.

lol ok so it was you who snitched on the thread.. man do your thing F prostitutes it does not matter many men do it and many men wish they could afford to..lol all that matters is that we are al Fing hos .. get it how you get it.. cause the worst thing not getting it.. i know that game is hard now fro all men asp. in atlanta where there are 30 men to every woman..lol

 

[edger]

lol ok so it was you who snitched on the thread

Huh? Why would I do that? You lost me on this one, lol.

many men do it

Yup. I know a few guys at work who used to do it, as well as 2 who still do it and one who has done it once when he came with me to Amsterdam. I asked him if he'd do it again and he said "yes"...and this guy looks like your typical Mr. GQ...good-looking guy. And I can imagine all the others who do it to, but won't come out and admit it. Then there's one of my buddies that I hang with who occassionally does it. And then, you got the guys from this forum who have done it in the past, those who are open to doing it, those who currently still do it, and those who won't admit that they do it. And then, lastly of course, you have the guys here on the forum who'll criticize you for it, "I can't believe you'll pay for it". But I say to those guys, "well, you're supporting your wives, so you're doing it too", which I know they don't like to hear, lol.

 

[DonGorgon]

Huh? Why would I do that? You lost me on this one, lol.




Yup. I know a few guys at work who used to do it, as well as 2 who still do it and one who has done it once when he came with me to Amsterdam. I asked him if he'd do it again and he said "yes"...and this guy looks like the typical Mr. GQ. And I can imagine all the others who do it to, but won't come out and admit it. Then there's one of my buddies that I hang with who occassionally does it. And then, you got the guys from this forum who have done it in the past, those who are open to doing it, and those who currently still do it. And then, lastly, of course, you have the guys here on the forum who will never admit they do it. But I say to those guys, "well, you're supporting your wives, so you're doing it too", which I know they don't like to hear, lol.

we agree on that

 

[ElChoclo]

Its illegal because it falsely represents that intimacy will be provided in exchange for money.

Its illegal because it would be so lucrative if legalised, that 50% of the GDP would end up being unproductively churned through the industry.

Its illegal because casual labour undermines union power by weakening the bargaining power of the permanent employees.

Its illegal because in feminist theory such workers are ideologically regarded as being forced into the job by male oppression. The fact that someone might do something for payment of money negates the oppression theory.

Its illegal because in traditional biological systems only a few males mated with many females, not the other way round with many males mating with a few females. So it goes against nature.

 

[DonGorgon]

Its illegal because it falsely represents that intimacy will be provided in exchange for money.

Its illegal because it would be so lucrative if legalised, that 50% of the GDP would end up being unproductively churned through the industry.

Its illegal because casual labour undermines union power by weakening the bargaining power of the permanent employees.

Its illegal because in feminist theory such workers are ideologically regarded as being forced into the job by male oppression. The fact that someone might do something for payment of money negates the oppression theory.

Its illegal because in traditional biological systems only a few males mated with many females, not the other way round with many males mating with a few females. So it goes against nature.

You are very smart my friend.

 

[Captain Harlock]

No he's not. The whole '50% of the GDP would end up being unproductively churned through the industry' - what a load of crap. All the other arguments suck too.

Prostitution is legal over here. Drugs are hardly a problem over here. Yet the US is 9000 times more ****ed up than this country. In fact all the problems in this country seem minor compared to what you're dealing with.

 

[piranha45]

No he's not. The whole '50% of the GDP would end up being unproductively churned through the industry' - what a load of crap. All the other arguments suck too.

http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/hyperbole

 

[Hooligan Harry]

Its illegal because it falsely represents that intimacy will be provided in exchange for money.

Its illegal because it would be so lucrative if legalised, that 50% of the GDP would end up being unproductively churned through the industry.

Its illegal because casual labour undermines union power by weakening the bargaining power of the permanent employees.

Its illegal because in feminist theory such workers are ideologically regarded as being forced into the job by male oppression. The fact that someone might do something for payment of money negates the oppression theory.

Its illegal because in traditional biological systems only a few males mated with many females, not the other way round with many males mating with a few females. So it goes against nature.

You are a crackpot

 

[edger]

You are a crackpot

Lol, I was thinking the same thing. He lost me on all, except for statements 2 and 4, but I still highly doubt that is the reason why it is illegal.

In statement 2, it is true that if it were legalized, there would stand a chance men might not strive to achieve wealth as much, because we all know the reason most men pursue certain high paying careers, is to attract hot women. So, if men aren't motivated to pursue these paricular high paying careers, an economy can possibly falter. But I would say this obviously can't be the reason, because look, Amsterdam's economy is still functioning, as well as other countries economies where it's legal. So, statement 2 can be ruled out.

In statement 4, it is true that feminists and AFC's are pushing and spreading the false word that these women are being "forced" into the profession. Sure, some are forced into it, but the greater majority aren't. And the ones being forced into it, are the streetwalkers, not the ones advertising on Eros.com or any other escort sites, nor the window girls of Amsterdam.

Like I said, the reason it's illegal is because religious nuts have too much influence in the political arena here in the U.S. Apparently, there is no such thing as "separation of Church and State" in the U.S.

 

[DonGorgon]

No he's not. The whole '50% of the GDP would end up being unproductively churned through the industry' - what a load of crap. All the other arguments suck too.

Prostitution is legal over here. Drugs are hardly a problem over here. Yet the US is 9000 times more ****ed up than this country. In fact all the problems in this country seem minor compared to what you're dealing with.

Ah yes humans and their perpetually pointing fingers..lol You are no better cause you geographical location is different.. you have the same wants and needs as every other human and are prone to the same deviant carnal tendencies.. As you were..( oh by the way im a brit, incase you were about to "america bash")

 

[edger]

The whole '50% of the GDP would end up being unproductively churned through the industry' - what a load of crap. All the other arguments suck too.

Prostitution is legal over here. Drugs are hardly a problem over here. Yet the US is 9000 times more ****ed up than this country. In fact all the problems in this country seem minor compared to what you're dealing with.

Captain is right. It should be more than obvious to the world that Holland is still able to thrive and function perfectly with it's legalized policy on prostitution and "tolerant" policy towards soft drugs(Marijuana has never actually been legalized in the Netherlands, according to popular belief, however, it is tolerated. That's what I heard a tour guide in Amsterdam explaining once). I spend enough time there to notice.

 

[edger]

Oh, by the way, Captain, I never got a chance to comment on your post about how Holland is turning into a police state these days. I hear ya. Lots of girls Kamers have been closed. Too many religious nuts infiltrating the Hague these days. The people of Holland really need to take a stand, because this is really becoming a problem, as you are aware. Since August of 2008, I have noticed a significant number of Kamers have been closed. I keep hearing the newly elected religious, nutjob officials in the Hague are either trying to slowly rid the city of prostitutes or are either trying to designate it to one little are where "Sexyland" is. If they entirely get rid of it, THEN, I'd say, YES, Holland would be in for an economic downward spiral. These new politicians better think smart if they want their country to continue to thrive, as the main bulk of their tourism is based on people coming for the prostitutes and weed.

A good place to get the full scoop on it would be here: http://www.ignatzmice.com/WWWBoard/PHPBB/phpBB2/login.php, a Holland based discussion board that talks about and reviews the numerous prostitutes of the Dam.

 

[Captain Harlock]

The trade in magic mushrooms has been outlawed as well because some stupid ass tourists died because of it - of course nobody focused on the fact that they were already drunk as **** and died because of the combined effect. I've never read about anyone dying in this country because of proper use of shrooms. Politicians however are stupid, so because of pressure from outside countries (like France) the government gave in, despite reports from government-funded organisations which said there should be no reason to outlaw the shrooms.

There's also been a crackdown on coffee shops the last few years. Because polticians need a scapegoats to focus their problems on - like how customers would cause trouble, which is just ridiculous. Ever seen a stoner fight anyone?