Prostitution is not legal because:

[Nutz]

Women will generally NOT support prostitution. Here's why:

Pvssy is a rare resource like gold or diamonds. The rarer the resource the higher its value. This is simple supply and demand. When supply skyrockets for the low low price of a trip to a brothel suddenly women in relationships can no longer MANIPULATE MEN by withholding sex. And that's why women will generally never support prostitution, despite the fact that they logically already support it when they support abortion. After all being pro-choice means "my body, my choice". Follow the logic

 

[Duffdog]

If you want to know what society would be like if prostitution were legal, simply take a trip to Nevada and live there for a while. You will find that the people there don't even notice if there is a prostitute around them-- it might as well be a cup of coffee. The men and women are so incredibly desensitized to sex its ridiculous. The desperation of the average guy has completely evaporated, and the girls have an entirely different take on what is required of a female. Even in schools, the girls know that the ONLY thing that matters in life for a girl is BEING HOT. That is their job. The only thing that matters for guys is BEING RICH. It is a very interesting dynamic when you think about it. It is almost as if the superficiality of the rest of the world is amplified when you live there. I think that because prostitution is legal, it just raised the bar on what the non-prostitute females have to do in order to score a good guy.

When I was in NV quite a bit, I felt like I was in another world. Just walking through the mall was (and still is) crazy-- almost every girl is a 7+! I would suddenly be reminded of how many fat chics were in Northern California and how all of them thought that they deserved a man simply because they possessed a vag1na. It is not like that in a city where prostitution is legal-- for any normal average guy can get laid for 50 bucks, so why even talk to a fat chic?

 

[SXS]

Free? Are you on crack? It's anything but "free". Yeah, it might be "free" in that you can make as much money as you want, in any way that you wish, but so what? It's repression if anything, because you're talking about a system that is based upon fierce, ruthless competition. And we're all pretty smart mature men around here(well some of us) to know that competition churns out a lot of losers. In a Capitalist system, you either win or you lose, plain and simple. No matter how hard people will try to be successful in it, some of those people will end up losers regardless. It's inevitable. That's the only reason I'm not a proponent of it. Is that to say then I'm a proponent of Socialism or Comunism? No. What I'm a proponent of, is a system where we work and provide for ourselves, much like the way early man did, the way nature intended it to be for us.
Look at the state of the current economy. A consequence of a Capitalist society. Need I say more. It doesn't have to be this way.

And YOU are the one accusing others of being on crack ? Ha, ha. Go to the jungle, then, my friend.

 

[SXS]

In my country, there are prostitutes everywhere. I have prostitute friends. I dont know if its illegal, but nobody cares.

 

[Nutz]

I think that because prostitution is legal, it just raised the bar on what the non-prostitute females have to do in order to score a good guy.

When I was in NV quite a bit, I felt like I was in another world. Just walking through the mall was (and still is) crazy-- almost every girl is a 7+! I would suddenly be reminded of how many fat chics were in Northern California and how all of them thought that they deserved a man simply because they possessed a vag1na. It is not like that in a city where prostitution is legal-- for any normal average guy can get laid for 50 bucks, so why even talk to a fat chic?

Thank you. You just proved exactly what I was talking about above. Women would be scared ****less of the power they'd lose if prostitution was legalized.

 

[edger]

And YOU are the one accusing others of being on crack ? Ha, ha. Go to the jungle, then, my friend.

If you read in between the lines, you'd have been able to figure out that it wasn't meant literally. I said it would be better if we lived "much" like the way early man did, not EXACTLY like the way they did. In other words, I'm not saying lets go back to living in huts or caves without technology, but lets live the way we do now, but where we work and provide for ourselves without relying on a paycheck from somebody. It's complicated to explain. But I also am a realist and do realize such a way of life taking root, is a far fetched possibility. Lots of people aren't willing to change the persent.

 

[edger]

So everyone out there who lives in a house with heat, hot water, electricity is a loser?

No, I'm trying to say the "losers" are those who are struggling financially; those who try/tried to do well in the system, but lost/are losing the battle. Like I said, there's always going to be those who will lose the battle, not everybody can obviously win. When two teams are competing against each other, there can only be one winner, correct? It's an impossibility for both teams to win. That's the point I'm trying to make regarding Capitalism.

 

[SXS]

If you read in between the lines, you'd have been able to figure out that it wasn't meant literally. I said it would be better if we lived "much" like the way early man did, not EXACTLY like the way they did. In other words, I'm not saying lets go back to living in huts or caves without technology, but lets live the way we do now, but where we work and provide for ourselves without relying on a paycheck from somebody. It's complicated to explain. But I also am a realist and do realize such a way of life taking root, is a far fetched possibility. Lots of people aren't willing to change the persent.

Ok!

No, I'm trying to say the "losers" are those who are struggling financially; those who try/tried to do well in the system, but lost/are losing the battle. Like I said, there's always going to be those who will lose the battle, not everybody can obviously win. When two teams are competing against each other, there can only be one winner, correct? It's an impossibility for both teams to win. That's the point I'm trying to make regarding Capitalism.

I dont see a reason why there has to be a loser. I dont care if some guy has a zillion dollars, I am happy with how much money I have and I think anyone can get a pretty decent life nowadays, unless there is something blocking the way, and I dont even live in the greatest economy in the world.
Are you american by any chance ?

 

[DonGorgon]

I can't disagree with the tampering in Government. That is just another example of how we do NOT have a free market. Our Government can be bought thru lobbyists to then pass new laws.

The best way around that is to severely limit the amount of $$ that any entity can donate to a political cause or campaign. When Corporations can donate massive amounts of money, their voice tends to be the one heard most by the politicians.

Not possible to stop since money is more powerful than god and those who have jit will find ways to get it to those who make decisions

 

[DonGorgon]

Women will generally NOT support prostitution. Here's why:

Pvssy is a rare resource like gold or diamonds. The rarer the resource the higher its value. This is simple supply and demand. When supply skyrockets for the low low price of a trip to a brothel suddenly women in relationships can no longer MANIPULATE MEN by withholding sex. And that's why women will generally never support prostitution, despite the fact that they logically already support it when they support abortion. After all being pro-choice means "my body, my choice". Follow the logic

So true and the fact that women have a monopoly on PU$$Y means that they have extreme power that spills over into economic issues since men are willing to work extra hard to make enough money to spend during courting relationships and marriage or to just get layed,,

 

[DonGorgon]

Example: Canada. I dare you to tell me that regulation leads to MORE concentrations of wealth here. Its the opposite.

And stop posting these garbage youtube videos. Not every idiot needs to be heard.

true

 

[edger]

SXS, yes, I was born and raised in the U.S. My bloodline though consists of Italian, Russian, and Turkish. Half Italian, quarter Russian, quarter Turkish.

 

[Duffdog]

Ok!



I dont see a reason why there has to be a loser. I dont care if some guy has a zillion dollars, I am happy with how much money I have and I think anyone can get a pretty decent life nowadays, unless there is something blocking the way, and I dont even live in the greatest economy in the world.
Are you american by any chance ?

The essence of being a human being is to control and destroy MORE natural resources than your fellow man. The man who has control of the most resources has access to the best women, the best food, the best everything because he is superior. Men are not equal, you have the choice of stomping or being stomped on. There is no middle ground.

Suffice it to say, the attractive women want the stompers, not the stompees.

 

[Jitterbug]

Well prostitution is legal where I live (Australia) and it doesn't make the women (non-prostie) any easier to deal with, compared to America. They have the same PMS - Princess Mentality Syndrome. Nor do people here have the attitude of the Nevada folks either. Having said that, it means less crime on the street and more tax for the gov so everyone is kinda happy.

 

[piranha45]

heh, i guess that blows the prostitution-revolution theories away...

 

[Captain Harlock]

Why do you disagree with what I said? What you posted immediately afterward supports my theory.

Men want sex much more than women do. How come there are no sites where girls go to ask how to get laid? Why do dating sites have a ratio of like 5 men for every woman? Even fat girls can go to bars and have dozens of guys hitting on them, how come that doesn't happen to guys? Why isn't there a huge black market for male sex slaves but there is for female?

there's the social conditioning thing that makes them repressed prudes.

 

[randalll]

we should have more threads like this

 

[DonGorgon]

Why do you disagree with what I said? What you posted immediately afterward supports my theory.

Men want sex much more than women do. How come there are no sites where girls go to ask how to get laid? Why do dating sites have a ratio of like 5 men for every woman? Even fat girls can go to bars and have dozens of guys hitting on them, how come that doesn't happen to guys? Why isn't there a huge black market for male sex slaves but there is for female?

exactly.. an how come ladies get in free to many clubs and free drinks while men pay?

 

[DonGorgon]

how is it slavery when no one is forced to work for anyone?[/url]

That's whats brilliant.. you are forced to work by the system which is stacked against you if you are poor ore a minority. The capitalist system is your god and master..

It was unbalanced from the beginning when it emerged from colonialism and industrialism.. The money that fueled its birth in the first place was in the hands of too few people who had too much control over 99% of the GDP. So all the companies and corporations were formed to benifit some but NOT all. The fact that slavery went on for 400 years and created wealth that was used to build the corporate superstructure we see today by capitalizing on the lives of captured humans is an indicator of the way capitalism operates sans physical whips and chains.

The government is a farce, nothing more then the same rich business men pretending to really care about the well being of all the people, but they are part of , and controlled by the corporate super structure. THIER MAIN GOAL IS TO KEEP THE MASSES WORKING HARD TO KEEP THE CAPITALIST WEALTH SYSTEM WORKING FOR THE WEALTHY FEW who still control too much of the GDP hence why many state govts have problems financing the basic operation of there jurisdictions.

 

[DonGorgon]

The essence of being a human being is to control and destroy MORE natural resources than your fellow man. The man who has control of the most resources has access to the best women, the best food, the best everything because he is superior. Men are not equal, you have the choice of stomping or being stomped on. There is no middle ground.

Suffice it to say, the attractive women want the stompers, not the stompees.

^^^AH YES THE WONDERFUL SOUND OF REALITY.. I LOVE IT..
most folks dont think like that cause they are afraid to accept that we are simply animals competing for limited resources.. full stop.. nature only wants us to make enough new humans to keep the species alive..lol