Porn is for losers

[Trump]

Pamela Anderson, one of the sexiest women in the world in her prime, write an article for WSJ entited “No more Indulging Porn.”

https://www.rollingstone.com/culture/culture-news/pamela-anderson-porn-is-for-losers-102328/

She has co-written a Wall Street journal op-ed slamming pornography as “a boring, wasteful and dead-end outlet for people too lazy to reap the ample rewards of healthy sexuality.” In essence, “porn is for losers.”

Does she have a point?

 

[Who Dares Win]

I had fapping sessions more rewarding than certain real intercourses, I understand that such topic is a taboo in this forum but truth exists anyway.

And I'm not even considering a cost-benefits ratio or rate of return, Im talking about the simple act itself.

Fat, tattoos and mind fvcks surely dont help to improve the experience.

 

[Focal core]

I had fapping sessions more rewarding than certain real intercourses, I understand that such topic is a taboo in this forum but truth exists anyway.

And I'm not even considering a cost-benefits ratio or rate of return, Im talking about the simple act itself.

Fat, tattoos and mind fvcks surely dont help to improve the experience.

It hypocrisy from her, in her world they got machines and vibratory lol..

 

[ChillDude6767]

It hypocrisy from her, in her world they got machines and vibratory lol..

Not to mention she could have sex with any guy in the world at the snap of her fingers.

That's not the case for any guy. No matter what they tell you.

 

[ChillDude6767]

Who gives a fvck what some dumb b1tch thinks? And what makes her (a female) think she's qualified to give opinions on what males should do? What a dumb@$s. I'm glad she has hepatitis.

 

[Who Dares Win]

She makes it seems as it depends on ones effort rather than his LMS...guess with some effort she could star again in the baywatch remake then.

She can star as david hasseloff mom possibly.

 

[marmel75]

It hypocrisy from her, in her world they got machines and vibratory lol..

Most people can't name one woman they know without a vibrator...even ones you'd never expect to have them by looking at them have them.

 

[sosousage]

Pamela Anderson, one of the sexiest women in the world in her prime, write an article for WSJ entited “No more Indulging Porn.”

https://www.rollingstone.com/culture/culture-news/pamela-anderson-porn-is-for-losers-102328/

She has co-written a Wall Street journal op-ed slamming pornography as “a boring, wasteful and dead-end outlet for people too lazy to reap the ample rewards of healthy sexuality.” In essence, “porn is for losers.”

Does she have a point?

all woman has to do to get a di.ck is a smile. its funny hearing that from woman. you cant really lose with puzzy unless you were really fricked by genetics

 

[sosousage]

if men during youth arent confident/alphas/outgoing/chads/playboys then unless they meet someone through social circle @bigdave17 they most likely will stay single till they finish degree and get good job (about age 24-30+). then they will attract some postwall/aging/desperate woman (that will pick him ONLY because there are no more chads and ONLY because of his jobs/assets/financial situation and thats the secret of most relationships

i think its worth mentioning that when these men who couldnt get puzzy till age 20 and work their assess off on STEM or similar hard degree and then in job (so from age 20 till age 25-30), will get a woman who that time spent on **** carousel/parties/relationships and cheating on her chad BF with some random dude to make him jealous

 

[mrgoodstuff]

Not to mention she could have sex with any guy in the world at the snap of her fingers.

That's not the case for any guy. No matter what they tell you.

Some actors and entertainers have this priveledge.

 

[Bokanovsky]

Regardless of how you feel about porn, you can’t take anything Pamela Anderson says seriously. One look at how she chose to live her own life (especially when she was in her prime) would show that’s she not a good example for anybody.

 

[Trump]

Who gives a fvck what some dumb b1tch thinks? And what makes her (a female) think she's qualified to give opinions on what males should do?

Wall Street Journal cared enough to publish her thoughts in their paper.

 

[shouldbefun]

if men during youth arent confident/alphas/outgoing/chads/playboys then unless they meet someone through social circle @bigdave17 they most likely will stay single till they finish degree and get good job (about age 24-30+). then they will attract some postwall/aging/desperate woman (that will pick him ONLY because there are no more chads and ONLY because of his jobs/assets/financial situation and thats the secret of most relationships

i think its worth mentioning that when these men who couldnt get puzzy till age 20 and work their assess off on STEM or similar hard degree and then in job (so from age 20 till age 25-30), will get a woman who that time spent on **** carousel/parties/relationships and cheating on her chad BF with some random dude to make him jealous

This is right. Whats the alternative ?

 

[PeasantPlayer]

Wall Street Journal cared enough to publish her thoughts in their paper.

Wall Street is interested in generating revenue

 

[MatureDJ]

Pamela Anderson, one of the sexiest women in the world in her prime, write an article for WSJ entited “No more Indulging Porn.”

https://www.rollingstone.com/culture/culture-news/pamela-anderson-porn-is-for-losers-102328/

She has co-written a Wall Street journal op-ed slamming pornography as “a boring, wasteful and dead-end outlet for people too lazy to reap the ample rewards of healthy sexuality.” In essence, “porn is for losers.”

Does she have a point?

Anderson is a past-her-prime tart that can no longer compete with younger, more-natural models.

This is her not too long ago. I couldn't care less what this trollop has to say about p0rn.

https://www.pornhub.com/view_video.php?viewkey=ph59cd500809b25

 

[MatureDJ]

Not to mention she could have sex with any guy in the world at the snap of her fingers.

That's not the case for any guy. No matter what they tell you.

I wouldn't tap her these days.

 

[touma.akagi]

It's mainly incels who eat it up the most. The college I went to had a guy with a PornHub sticker on his laptop. Great idea, just tell everyone what you do alone on Friday nights.

 

[Focal core]

Not to mention she could have sex with any guy in the world at the snap of her fingers.

That's not the case for any guy. No matter what they tell you.

Yeah snapping fingers to a bums and crooks, it's not humanly possible to have a partner at any given time that's happily in a relationship all the time, life fulls of challenges up and down, she got the most idiotic statement of all time.

 

[IKO69]

Crazy. I remember when I was an adolescent/teenager there was a mass hysteria surrounding this chick. Anyway she is just a washed up ***** - who really cares what Pamela Anderson has to say? She profited off her looks and sold her body to the highest bidder for years...her scathing attack against porn is simply because she is yesterdays news and no one cares about her anymore. Now she is just washed up, bitter, cranky and jealous.

Although sure, lay off the porn and go meet some women for ****s sake.

 

[Macaframalama]

I think she's got a valid point and thinking, that women can get laid at the "drop of a hat" or "snap of the finger" couldn't be further from the truth. Sure, they could, just as men could, but it would be the equivalent of men settling for fvcking fat girls, women aren't settling for basement dwelling, social retards, that can't keep a hard d!ck. Had an eye opening convo back roading with a few chicks the other night. I have a general rule of never traveling further than the next town over, in any direction for a piece of a$$. DGAF how hot she is. These biches are frequently driving 2hrs+ for the D, from all i could tell were just basic douchebags. Common theme, they weren't exactly socialy retarded, very average looking joe's, but proactive in their approach of them. Mindblowing chit to me in the moment and only confirmed what i had already known about myself. I can dig her perspective and see it as her "challenging" men to be men. Whether, she is washed up cvm dump is irrelevant. What she says is true. The only thing any man should be concerned about in 2019, is whether she gets your d!ck hard and if her legs are open. Analyzing anything else is just p!ssing in the wind. Stick to doing what comes natural and concern yourselves with fvcking pvssy.