***Official Sosuave Average Number Of Lays***

[JoeMarron]

I've compiled the average of reported lays in the interview threads. If a poster reported a range of how many lays they've had I used the lowest number for my average (just incase some of you are bullsh!tting ). I shall update this thread as more interviews come in.

Mean (Average) - 30
Median (Middle Value) - 15
Mode (Most Repeated Number) - 8
Range - 98

 

[JohnChops]

You have way to much time on your hands may I suggest getting to the gym, reading a book, studying, and going outside?

 

[HumbleNinja]

I've compiled the average of reported lays in the interview threads. If a poster reported a range of how many lays they've had I used the lowest number for my average (just incase some of you are bullsh!tting ). I shall update this thread as more interviews come in.

Mean (Average) - 30
Median (Middle Value) - 15
Mode (Most Repeated Number) - 8
Range - 98

Joe I'll be putting your interview up later when I get the chance.

I'd like to take the chance to remind all I've slept with 5 women (3 LTR's 2 ONS) in my life making me unqualified to give any common sense advice on chicks period so for now I'll stick to doing interviews. Thanks!

 

[Mike32ct]

I like the mode of eight .

 

[mustfirstregister]

I humblely finished a dozen. so where am i?

 

[JoeMarron]

You have way to much time on your hands may I suggest getting to the gym, reading a book, studying, and going outside?

Nah bro. I find compiling statistics on lays of random dudes on the internet far more satisfying.

 

[Bokanovsky]

Men over pad their numbers, women under pad theirs. I've had sexual relations with 30 women and I'm 26. I'm not proud of it, 90% of them were fuglys and whales.

And this is exactly why such statistic are completely f*cking worthless. There is not skill in laying ugs and fatties. All that's necessary is low self-esteem and a general lack of pride. Every time you bang anything less than a 7, it shouldn't count. Actually, scratch that. It should count, but as a -1 to your overall score.

 

[_sideways_]

You have way to much time on your hands may I suggest getting to the gym, reading a book, studying, and going outside?

Lmao

 

[HumbleNinja]

And this is exactly why such statistic are completely f*cking worthless. There is not skill in laying ugs and fatties. All that's necessary is low self-esteem and a general lack of pride. Every time you bang anything less than a 7, it shouldn't count. Actually, scratch that. It should count, but as a -1 to your overall score.

That's what I'm saying. I could care less if some dudes banged tons of neighborhood slvts, hood rats, whales, drunken bar trash etc. as if that's some "accomplishment". Some dudes cannot accept the fact there are dudes who would gladly pass on those types of chicks.

Same reason I took and take POF as a joke and just fvck around on there and didn't bother to meet any of them till two I'm talking to daily recently. (Both contact me everyday. At times gets annoying to be honest.) 99.999% of those types have either banged who knows how many dudes online, are well known skanks in their area, have issues, baggage, etc. or all mentioned. I'd rather pass on them than need them to add to a count to "prove" something to random dudes online.

 

[Mr Wright]

It's literally all ego.

If you've banged 100+ chicks there will naturally be a few ugly chicks you wouldnt want to go near again in there. There is no shame in admitting it. I can safely think of a few girls who i've slept with drunk who i would never go near again. My standards have improved.

And if your numbers much lower, you've probably missed some good pvssy by not being forward and sexual enough. Saying you dont care about high numbers is also slightly fishy otherwise why would you be on here? Im guessing its to learn how to meet more quality women and improve your life, if you arent meeting enough quality women, you're still learning.

And to the OP, I think you'll find the average number of lays on here is bi-modal. Some guys will have 100+ and another cluster of guys will have around 5-20.

 

[HyperAnalyze]

Need to start getting a lay fax history report on some of these guys.

 

[skinnyguy]

Guys who pad their numbers are not just stupid...they're gay.

Having sex with a bunch of ugly chicks doesn't count.

A guy who had sex with 5 hot chicks has a much better record than a guy who had sex with 50 average or ugly ones. It's not really the number that matters. It's quality.

If I agreed to fvck ugly chicks, I'd have over 200 lays by now.

 

[sylvester the cat]

Guys who pad their numbers are not just stupid...they're gay.

Having sex with a bunch of ugly chicks doesn't count.

A guy who had sex with 5 hot chicks has a much better record than a guy who had sex with 50 average or ugly ones. It's not really the number that matters. It's quality.

If I agreed to fvck ugly chicks, I'd have over 200 lays by now.

How does padding numbers make a guy gay? A liar, yes. But gay for lying about the numbers of women he sleeps with, how?

Having sex with a bunch of ugly chicks doesn't count...for what? It counts for the number of lays clearly. What else are you counting?

It's not really the number that matters, it's quality? Matters to whom? Whom are we getting laid for here? Yourself or for other posters you can brag to? Although I'm no war-pig lover, I don't need to score perfect 10s all the time. A fit 5 or 6 is perfectly fine. When the lights are off it's their actions that count anyway.

If you agreed to fvck ugly chicks you'd have over 200 lays by now? should have used them as practice.

 

[CrimsonPanther]

Guys who have sex with other guys...they're gay.

Having sex with a bunch of ugly chicks does count.

A guy who had sex with 5 hot chicks has a much better record than a guy who had sex with 50 average or ugly ones. It's not really the number that matters. It's quality.
Neither matters. The guy being content with his numbers/quality, is that matters.

If I agreed to fvck ugly chicks, I'd have over 200 lays by now.

Yeah, i have this kind of girl friends also. they are fugly, have nothing to offer a man, yet they wouldn't ever settle for a man less than johnny depp. low quality with high standards. the ultimate fail.

i admit, i boned girls i am not proud of. but hey, why not? at that moment it did the trick. my wiener was horny, and it was satisfied. why judge? why set standards FOR OTHERS?

i also boned beautiful girls. but besides the ego boost it really was no different. as good ol' stiffler used to say: "hey, pvssy's pvssy"

 

[Rainman4707]

Well my lay count is seven. I would like to improve on that, but my
ultimate goal is a long-term relationship. Marriage, kids all that stuff.

My standards have slightly lowered over the last 18 months because I realised that the more practice I get in the sack..the better i'll be =)

 

[skinnyguy]

If you agreed to fvck ugly chicks you'd have over 200 lays by now? should have used them as practice.

Umm I was with a 4...and I literally could not get it up. We couldn't have sex because of this. So even if I tried I couldn't actually do it with them!!

I pity guys who fvck fat/ugly women. You lower your social value every time you do this.

 

[Slickster]

Here's a question....

What do you deem more important? The number of different lays or the total number of lays?

I can remember back in high school having this same conversation. Guys were going around the room bragging about how many chicks they banged. Obviously the guy with the highest number was going to be deemed king. At the time I had a long term gf and we used to fvck like rabbits. I wasn't the type to brag about these things despite the fact that she was one of the hottest chicks in school. Anyhow when it came around to me, my answer was one. Everyone laughed and one guy asked how I could stay tied down to just one girl. I said, "well I've probably fvcked her over 200 times". Everyone shut up after that. :crackup:

 

[sylvester the cat]

Umm I was with a 4...and I literally could not get it up. We couldn't have sex because of this. So even if I tried I couldn't actually do it with them!!

I pity guys who fvck fat/ugly women. You lower your social value every time you do this.

NO offence but going by other poster's responses to your posts your social value on this site is pretty much non-existent. Could fvcking a fatty make your value any lower? no jk.

 

[HyperAnalyze]

Banging an average or below average girl should subtract from your total count.

 

[sylvester the cat]

Banging an average or below average girl should subtract from your total count.

that's ridiculous. if every man didnt bang an average looking girl they would be virgins.

i had a one-itis with a girl who at first glance was no more than a 5 at best. with a bit of make up, high heels etc she transformed into a 7/8. part of her appeal was her extremely flirty persona.

not that i'm a fatty fvkcer or anything but would do i care what anyone thinks of who i've fcked.