Big debate going on on FB between my family and myself. Their issue - marriage is declining - and the article says "because women won't date down" and the OP is calling the article out as BS, as well as Hypergamey, calling me an incel and a cuck (very common and my skin is thick so no big deal).
I waited for one to respond who I knew was getting married and I found it interesting his response:
No no FMCSMT, understanding it is not the problem. The logic is sound, though horrifying. You basically deconstruct a broken relationship (which involves a woman leaving a man for another) by simply saying, the woman only left you because she found an upgrade. If that isn’t the biggest damn insecurity I have ever heard of, idk what is. You know, men who have been repeatedly left by woman for Chad Thundercock might wanna start asking themselves, ‘maybe it’s me?’ but then that wouldn’t fit with your little diagram some douche nozzle trumped up.
The reality is, it turns out woman have brains too and they know how to use them. When they find a guy isn’t what they’re looking for, they’ll probably look elsewhere. And as with either gender, there are both good and bad people complete with good and bad motives.
Your little red pill society is exactly what Dan described it; a **** ton of inadequate men complaining about woman who left them because Chad Thundercock swooped in. Here’s the thing though, of the two of you, who do you think is more happy at this current moment: the person currently enlisted in a bogus internet cult, or the other one with the guy nicknamed ‘Thundercock’. I’ll bet only one of the two is satisfied...."
I said nothing about a woman leaving because she found an upgrade and he assumes I am insecure (again, common response).
I am curious as to how you would respond. This is my blood. I don't wish to direct him any sort of way. But I do wish to respond with some of your help, if possible.
I waited for one to respond who I knew was getting married and I found it interesting his response:
No no FMCSMT, understanding it is not the problem. The logic is sound, though horrifying. You basically deconstruct a broken relationship (which involves a woman leaving a man for another) by simply saying, the woman only left you because she found an upgrade. If that isn’t the biggest damn insecurity I have ever heard of, idk what is. You know, men who have been repeatedly left by woman for Chad Thundercock might wanna start asking themselves, ‘maybe it’s me?’ but then that wouldn’t fit with your little diagram some douche nozzle trumped up.
The reality is, it turns out woman have brains too and they know how to use them. When they find a guy isn’t what they’re looking for, they’ll probably look elsewhere. And as with either gender, there are both good and bad people complete with good and bad motives.
Your little red pill society is exactly what Dan described it; a **** ton of inadequate men complaining about woman who left them because Chad Thundercock swooped in. Here’s the thing though, of the two of you, who do you think is more happy at this current moment: the person currently enlisted in a bogus internet cult, or the other one with the guy nicknamed ‘Thundercock’. I’ll bet only one of the two is satisfied...."
I said nothing about a woman leaving because she found an upgrade and he assumes I am insecure (again, common response).
I am curious as to how you would respond. This is my blood. I don't wish to direct him any sort of way. But I do wish to respond with some of your help, if possible.
