regular_guy said:
Why do you roll your eyes at that though? I mean if they like feeling that attention, love, addorment, whatever you want to call it, why not give to them sporadically?
Because they feel that they deserve it because of their mere existance. Because they are women who believe that they should be treated that way because they say so as opposed to actually doing something to deserve it.
regular_guy said:
I'am sure shen she feels good about herself she will recipricate that feeling towards us "men". Everyone will be more happier.
:crackup: If this were true AFC's wouldn't be frustrated nor chumps. Plus more men would get married not because they are expected to, they would get married because it would be emotionally benificial to them.
regular_guy said:
I noticed this principal in my salsa class, after the female instructor said, "take care of the ladies, always have the ladies do their moves first and then you can do yours" (i.e. always take care of them).
I dance the Salsa and the Merenge. My best dance partners aren't American women though.
regular_guy said:
I followed this caretaking principle with a sexy girl which I have fancied. The giving of extra caring communication through physical connection and movement, made her eyes light up. Its nice to have theory with practice.

Also I don't mind provinding adornment to a girl to a sexy girl I fancy, why not.
Because its superficial. There are tons of women out there at least as attractive if not more, big whoop. What differentiates them is their mindset, their demeanor, how they treat men. That deserves more praise than mere looks.
regular_guy said:
You can't just get rid of human instincts, and I believe sex is on top of the list of those instincts. Can't just turn it off. I am 24 and would love to have sex with many women, I can't help it. But I also want to enjoy myself and improve my skills that will help me in other areas of my life. Seduction is fun.
Who said anything about turning instincts off? What you are talking about is giving into them as if you have no control over yourself. It's like believing that once you become an alcoholic, you'll be one for the rest of your life. Yeah AA says that you are but I think it's a load of crap, everyone has the ability to chose to be otherwise or just give into the moniker.
Humans are higher on the evolutionary ladder because of their capacity to be able to make rational decisions (whether they do so or not). Paying homage to a person because of their looks or status gets society to a place where we are worrying about the actions of Britney, Lindsay, Miley or any other star whose name ends with a "y." It's because people treated them as super-special for superficial reasons, much like a woman who professes her royalty as wanting to be treated as a princess for merely existing.
But one thing I did notice, you yourself admitted that you can't help your actions. Society is in a bad place when people can easily say something like that without any concern. Welcome the possibility of a new hypothesis of
de-evolution.