SeymourCake
Banned
- Joined
- Apr 9, 2010
- Messages
- 1,523
- Reaction score
- 363
Why "Whatever You Want" Keeps You Single
She says the movie looks dumb; you suddenly agree. She tests you with a little attitude; you apologize for nothing.
You think you're being easy to get along with. She reads something else entirely: a man with no edges. Nothing to hold on to. No friction, no tension, no reason to wonder what he really thinks.
The "22 Rules" taught me to push back — playfully, calmly, without needing her approval. Strange things happened after that.
Man may face felony charges for reading cheating wife's e-mails
- Thread starter SeymourCake
- Start date
"She Laughed All Night. Then She Ghosted You. Here's Why."
Dinner ran three hours. She laughed at everything. You walked her to her car thinking this one's locked in.
Then: nothing. Two texts. No reply. What happened?
You did what most men do on a great date. You filled every silence, answered every question, and left her with nothing to wonder about. No mystery. Nothing to sit with when she got home.
Rule 3 of the "22 Rules" changes the ending: tell her a little, hold back the rest, and let her imagination do the chasing. The ghosting stops too.
The second husband is one of the nicest people in this situation and he is facing the worst part of it. Not only did he get cheated on but he is most likely going to jail for figuring out he was getting screwed and being the victim.SeymourCake said:
This case is so messed up. Sad part is he may get convicted. Good part is if he is guilty he can have the last laugh and ruin her chances of her ever seeing her kids for ruining his life.
5string
Master Don Juan
Is what she did illegal? No.
Is what he did illegal? Yep.
I'm not taking sides on this and feel really bad for the guy but, sometimes the law just does not seem right or just in certain situations. This clearly being one of them.
Is what he did illegal? Yep.
I'm not taking sides on this and feel really bad for the guy but, sometimes the law just does not seem right or just in certain situations. This clearly being one of them.
I still can figure out how this is illegal.
Guy and wife have pc in their own home yet he gets burned cause he reads an email...really.
They are charging this is a "Hack," Most hacks are considered getting into something on a electronic forum without consent. There is no reason how this is considered a "Hack."
The guy is married and living with her and the damn password is next to the damn computer....thats like putting a key to the safe on a hook next to a safe and saying "Dont use the key."
This should go to the net neutrality as well....its on the internet so anything is fair game just feminist trying to mess with a guy cause she got caught cheating and trying to shift the blame to him.
Guy and wife have pc in their own home yet he gets burned cause he reads an email...really.
They are charging this is a "Hack," Most hacks are considered getting into something on a electronic forum without consent. There is no reason how this is considered a "Hack."
The guy is married and living with her and the damn password is next to the damn computer....thats like putting a key to the safe on a hook next to a safe and saying "Dont use the key."
This should go to the net neutrality as well....its on the internet so anything is fair game just feminist trying to mess with a guy cause she got caught cheating and trying to shift the blame to him.
"She Made Her Decision Before You Finished Your Sentence"
Three seconds. That's how long it took. Your shoes. Your posture. The way you held your drink. Whether you looked at the floor or looked at her.
She already filed you away. Interesting. Boring. Safe. Bold. Before you even opened your mouth.
Everything you say after that is just her confirming what she already decided.
So stop rehearsing lines. Fix the first three seconds. Stand tall. Look up. Smile like you mean it. Walk like you belong wherever you're standing.
The words come later. The impression comes first.
I still can figure out how this is illegal.
Guy and wife have pc in their own home yet he gets burned cause he reads an email...really.
They are charging this is a "Hack," Most hacks are considered getting into something on a electronic forum without consent. There is no reason how this is considered a "Hack."
The guy is married and living with her and the damn password is next to the damn computer....thats like putting a key to the safe on a hook next to a safe and saying "Dont use the key."
This should go to the net neutrality as well....its on the internet so anything is fair game just feminist trying to mess with a guy cause she got caught cheating and trying to shift the blame to him.
Guy and wife have pc in their own home yet he gets burned cause he reads an email...really.
They are charging this is a "Hack," Most hacks are considered getting into something on a electronic forum without consent. There is no reason how this is considered a "Hack."
The guy is married and living with her and the damn password is next to the damn computer....thats like putting a key to the safe on a hook next to a safe and saying "Dont use the key."
This should go to the net neutrality as well....its on the internet so anything is fair game just feminist trying to mess with a guy cause she got caught cheating and trying to shift the blame to him.
This has NOTHING to do with net neutrality. Net neutrality means that service providers and other gateways cannot prioritize or block traffic. That means no censorship and no fast lanes and slow lanes for "priority" customers. Everyone gets treated the same way, like on a public highway.
From what I understand he's being charged under some wiretapping laws that were designed to protect against corporate espionage. I don't know what the hell the prosecutors in this case are thinking but this is complete bullsh*t and its a manipulation of the law.
From what I understand he's being charged under some wiretapping laws that were designed to protect against corporate espionage. I don't know what the hell the prosecutors in this case are thinking but this is complete bullsh*t and its a manipulation of the law.
This is why sheep get sheared.
This is why the morality police gets screwed in the end.
This is why betas are betas.
This guy played the captain save a ho role. Took on another man's kids from a woman he knew was no good hoping he could save her and the kids. Then he had the intelligence [sic] to admit to what he had done. And now want's sympathy for it. He brought it on himself.
Most women would have said, that her husband left his email open. She wouldn't admit to "hacking" into his account. She just happened to walk by and see it there. The even more adroit would have opened it...left it open for several hours or days in another window to have plausible deniability in court of law.
Did he get screwed? Yes. Is the prosecutor and judges being overzealous? Yes. But did he have a hand in it? Hell yes.
Sheep get sheared.
This is why the morality police gets screwed in the end.
This is why betas are betas.
This guy played the captain save a ho role. Took on another man's kids from a woman he knew was no good hoping he could save her and the kids. Then he had the intelligence [sic] to admit to what he had done. And now want's sympathy for it. He brought it on himself.
Most women would have said, that her husband left his email open. She wouldn't admit to "hacking" into his account. She just happened to walk by and see it there. The even more adroit would have opened it...left it open for several hours or days in another window to have plausible deniability in court of law.
Did he get screwed? Yes. Is the prosecutor and judges being overzealous? Yes. But did he have a hand in it? Hell yes.
Sheep get sheared.
backbreaker
Master Don Juan
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EXJJFT9GZwY
that's about all I can say on the situation
and women wonder why all the "good men" in their 30's want no part of their ass. it's becoming a pretty ****ed up investment to get married.
that's about all I can say on the situation
and women wonder why all the "good men" in their 30's want no part of their ass. it's becoming a pretty ****ed up investment to get married.
"So, What Do You Do for Fun?"
She asks it casually, mid-sip. And you feel the floor open up, because the honest answer is work, gym, and a couple shows you're half-watching.
Women rarely say this out loud, but a man with a life is attractive before he says a word. The guy who spent Saturday deep-sea fishing and came back with photos and a story — he walks in already interesting.
The "22 Rules" pushed me to build a life worth talking about. Turns out the fastest way to be interesting to women is to be interested in your own life first.
cordoncordon
Master Don Juan
- Joined
- Jun 2, 2006
- Messages
- 2,889
- Reaction score
- 109
You guys need to understand that this is taking place in Detroit MI, which is near where I grew up and lived almost my entire life. Still have a house there I rent out.
There are two other big things going on right now in Detroit that the prosecutor is working on and one, or both, are influencing this case imo. Ex mayor Kilkpatrick and his fraud and money corruption charges, and also a prostitution case that may or may not involve some higher up big wigs. I can promise you this email case is being brought up and tried because of one of those other two cases....I'm guessing to protect some higher ups that could be implicated if who knows, some emails or phone calls or some other private info was gotten somehow...perhaps illegally. All imo, but this to me screams of a proactive action to protect some other people in those other cases.
So to me this really isn't worth debating, because under normal circumstances, this case would never see the light of day.
There are two other big things going on right now in Detroit that the prosecutor is working on and one, or both, are influencing this case imo. Ex mayor Kilkpatrick and his fraud and money corruption charges, and also a prostitution case that may or may not involve some higher up big wigs. I can promise you this email case is being brought up and tried because of one of those other two cases....I'm guessing to protect some higher ups that could be implicated if who knows, some emails or phone calls or some other private info was gotten somehow...perhaps illegally. All imo, but this to me screams of a proactive action to protect some other people in those other cases.
So to me this really isn't worth debating, because under normal circumstances, this case would never see the light of day.
If only the government faced similar punishment for their snooping.
I feel sorry for the guy, but I'm not sure if this is a bad precedent to set, especially because women use this against men much more often. I suspect that it will be selectively enforced in favor of women, in either direction.
I feel sorry for the guy, but I'm not sure if this is a bad precedent to set, especially because women use this against men much more often. I suspect that it will be selectively enforced in favor of women, in either direction.