Let's debunk the bullsh1t about men being "insecure" if they dont want a promiscuous woman

[Fortune_favors_the_bold]

Men dont want to commit to promiscuous women because they dont want to pay full price for something that others before them had for a lower price and at better conditions.

No one would buy a used car for 100k full price if someone else got it with a coupon at 70% discount right before him.

It's not a matter of insecurity for the simple fact that we would ALL BANG those women in a FWB relations if we didnt have to commit nor invest.
We would all drive that car easily if the price was 30% of the one asked.

It's really that simple.

Whoever think otherwise it's either a woman trying market herself, men playing their cards while still thinking that sympathy will get them laid or a youtuber that needs clicks and people arguing in his/her page.

The whole "insecurity" thing is a further ridicule shaming attempt that should bring nothing but loud laughting to anyone with at least an averare IQ.

 

[zekko]

Agree, it is natural to be turned off by promiscuous women, because that would lessen the chance of your seed surviving. If you are the only guy having sex with the girl, there is a 100% chance that any child is yours. Ride the town bike, and that might drop to one in a hundred.

 

[Murk]

I agree with you both, but the way the world is right now, most men will be with women who have had a past whether they reveal that info or not.

My opinion on this keeps changing, yes I want the 0-3 body count wife, but my odds of that are rather slim. I think I would be ok with a girl that has minimal damage/baggage even if she’s had 10-20 bodies in her past. As long as she’s not a hoe and is loyal. It’s very easy to rack up bodies these days.

 

[Divorced w 3]

To be completely fair, I think a lot of users on this page, self included , harbor a decent amount of insecurities. Obviously, a woman’s partner count is going to be one of the largest factors an insecure man is going to wrestle with.

I understand that there are potentially significant flags with a high partner count - but to the insecure person it can be a point of incessant rumination and self-comparison instead of a point of observation against other potential strengths and weaknesses.

To put it a different way, if an insecure person wants to find something to pick at, they’re going to find it. This isn’t to minimize a potential symptom in a partners personality or emotional makeup, just that it may be being interpreted by someone that has an unbalanced relationship philosophy.

Apparently only around 1/3 of people have an insecure attachment style, but that doesn’t mean we didn’t all find each other here.

 

[LTG71]

If a man met the 100 line check-list of qualifications but was only 5’ 4”, most women would reject him without any ridicule. But when a guy doesn’t want a hoe, he is insecure or shamed. These are inherent evolutionary directives that run in our biological firmware. Thought of this clip reading this post.

While the skit is a joke, his reaction is very real. The chic gave it up willingly during her “party years” but now makes the guy work for it post “hoe phase.” Guys want someone that is “special” and someone only he could obtain through some amount of effort. This shows up in many areas of life. Be it custom cars, boats, motorcycles, homes…etc. The uniqueness increases value. The village bicycle doesn’t hold any value if anyone can ride it.

 

[corrector]

Now, guys are even shamed for not wanting a trans-woman because then he's guilty of being homophobic and therefore insecure.

 

[Divorced w 3]

If a man met the 100 line check-list of qualifications but was only 5’ 4”, most women would reject him without any ridicule. But when a guy doesn’t want a hoe, he is insecure or shamed. These are inherent evolutionary directives that run in our biological firmware. Thought of this clip reading this post.

While the skit is a joke, his reaction is very real. The chic gave it up willingly during her “party years” but now makes the guy work for it post “hoe phase.” Guys want someone that is “special” and someone only he could obtain through some amount of effort. This shows up in many areas of life. Be it custom cars, boats, motorcycles, homes…etc. The uniqueness increases value. The village bicycle doesn’t hold any value if anyone can ride it.

What she doesn’t understand is that she could have had a string of hookups in her 20’s but she simply needs to adjust her approach into one of humility and partnership. If she carried herself differently and exuded class and intelligence she could have probably owned that interview. Again though, this is why the data exists because it’s more likely the case that there is something underlying this person and she seems like a common example.

 

[soulforge]

If a chick is age 24 and has a body count of 10 is that too high?

There is a strong possibility that she has had a relationship of a couple of years in between, which tells me from the age of 18 and 24 she has been pretty rampant with taking diks.

 

[HaleyBaron]

Decent argument. If a woman is a ho, I don't want a ho. If you want to bang hos, be my guest. But don't shame other men for not wanting to bang hos. Reminds me of the guys who get upset when people say they don't want to **** hookers or escorts. The defenders of escorts come out of the woodwork cause it's an attack on themselves.

 

[FlexpertHamilton]

When a woman claims her man is "insecure" or "controllling" for setting boundaries like this, quickly simply flip the script and inform her that she has it backwards.

A man who sets boundaries is in fact secure with himself because he tells her what he wants and is willing to lose her over it. An insecure man is one who doesn't set boundaries, because he's afraid of losing her.

I think women are so used to being able to manipulate and control weak men (especially at work) that when they actually meet a man who has boundaries, they can't handle it, so they resort to gaslighting and victimhood status.

 

[CBear]

If a man met the 100 line check-list of qualifications but was only 5’ 4”, most women would reject him without any ridicule. But when a guy doesn’t want a hoe, he is insecure or shamed. These are inherent evolutionary directives that run in our biological firmware. Thought of this clip reading this post.

While the skit is a joke, his reaction is very real. The chic gave it up willingly during her “party years” but now makes the guy work for it post “hoe phase.” Guys want someone that is “special” and someone only he could obtain through some amount of effort. This shows up in many areas of life. Be it custom cars, boats, motorcycles, homes…etc. The uniqueness increases value. The village bicycle doesn’t hold any value if anyone can ride it.

Precisely. It's a coping mechanism by women to lift each other up when rejected and short guys might as well say that women who have an issue with their heights are too insecure as well.

 

[CBear]

If a chick is age 24 and has a body count of 10 is that too high?

There is a strong possibility that she has had a relationship of a couple of years in between, which tells me from the age of 18 and 24 she has been pretty rampant with taking diks.

At age 24, I would say anything more than 4 or 5 is way too much if you're looking for a relationship.

 

[soulforge]

At age 24, I would say anything more than 4 or 5 is way too much if you're looking for a relationship.

Yeh my last relationship, the Russian girl, for some odd reason decided to tell me her body count. I didn't even ask for it.

Anyway at age 24 she told me it was 8, but we all know chicks lie about body count. It's more likely 10-12..

For age 24 that's pretty High, which tells me she ain't relationship material.

I dumped her recently so it it doesn't matter now

 

[soulforge]

When a woman claims her man is "insecure" or "controllling" for setting boundaries like this, quickly simply flip the script and inform her that she has it backwards.

A man who sets boundaries is in fact secure with himself because he tells her what he wants and is willing to lose her over it. An insecure man is one who doesn't set boundaries, because he's afraid of losing her.

I think women are so used to being able to manipulate and control weak men (especially at work) that when they actually meet a man who has boundaries, they can't handle it, so they resort to gaslighting and victimhood status.

Fresh and Fit giving you the correct mindset my G

 

[CBear]

Yeh my last relationship, the Russian girl, for some odd reason decided to tell me her body count. I didn't even ask for it.

Anyway at age 24 she told me it was 8, but we all know chicks lie about body count. It's more likely 10-12..

For age 24 that's pretty High, which tells me she ain't relationship material.

I dumped her recently so it it doesn't matter now

And that's the thing, after 4 or 5, it's evident that a girl has been hooking up or having one night stands rather than being in just relationships. And that can very easily be manipulated. 8 maybe the count to her but what about that one guy she tried it with who couldn't get hard and she was embarrassed? What about the guy she gave a blow job to? Etc.. what are you doing with your life as a woman that gives you that much time to be intimate with more than a couple guys? Nothing important, that's for sure.

 

[RazorRambo24]

Clowning girls/calling them out for hoe behavior is actually really gratifying. That's why dudes need to really level up in life and gain all the leverage. People lik eto sht on the idea of "high value males" but thats EXACTLY what you need to be for women to really respect you and let you talk to them the way you want to talk to them and still not want to leave your life. and I dont mean to just sh.t on them all the time.. But you can literally call girls out on bad behavior and watch them become obedient.

When it comes to men though, I dont think we need to debunk this.. We're all men who are here because we know that **** is bullsht.

 

[Millard Fillmore]

Everyone is entitled to preferences. If someone calls you "insecure" over it, that says more about them than you.

 

[Solomon]

Men dont want to commit to promiscuous women because they dont want to pay full price for something that others before them had for a lower price and at better conditions.

No one would buy a used car for 100k full price if someone else got it with a coupon at 70% discount right before him.

It's not a matter of insecurity for the simple fact that we would ALL BANG those women in a FWB relations if we didnt have to commit nor invest.
We would all drive that car easily if the price was 30% of the one asked.

It's really that simple.

Whoever think otherwise it's either a woman trying market herself, men playing their cards while still thinking that sympathy will get them laid or a youtuber that needs clicks and people arguing in his/her page.

The whole "insecurity" thing is a further ridicule shaming attempt that should bring nothing but loud laughting to anyone with at least an averare IQ.

You been watching Fresh and Fit eh?

 

[Fortune_favors_the_bold]

You been watching Fresh and Fit eh?

It's common knowledge nowadays, fresh and fit just spread it in a very simple way (often spectacular/trollish to get more views) so everyone can get it.

They say on utube what mentally sane men have been saying privately since forever.

Let's say that the genie is out of the bottle.

 

[Doctor Europeo]

Men dont want to commit to promiscuous women because they dont want to pay full price for something that others before them had for a lower price and at better conditions.

No one would buy a used car for 100k full price if someone else got it with a coupon at 70% discount right before him.

It's not a matter of insecurity for the simple fact that we would ALL BANG those women in a FWB relations if we didnt have to commit nor invest.
We would all drive that car easily if the price was 30% of the one asked.

It's really that simple.

Whoever think otherwise it's either a woman trying market herself, men playing their cards while still thinking that sympathy will get them laid or a youtuber that needs clicks and people arguing in his/her page.

The whole "insecurity" thing is a further ridicule shaming attempt that should bring nothing but loud laughting to anyone with at least an averare IQ.

Great thread, bro. It was long overdue.