Shiftkey
Master Don Juan
That definition is outdated. Dictionary.com doesn't even define multiverse.
You've replayed it a hundred times. She stood three feet away, scrolling her phone. You had an opening. You composed the perfect line — after she was gone.
For all you know, she's married now. To some guy who said something. Anything.
Openers are cheap. Almost any sentence works when it's delivered within three seconds. The expensive part is the standing there, drafting and deleting, while the window quietly closes.
The "22 Rules" stripped out my hesitation. What to open with, how to keep it alive, and the one habit that costs guys more women than anything else: waiting for perfect.
She calls you when her car breaks down. When she needs help moving. When some guy she's actually dating treats her badly.
You're the listener. The reliable one. The guy who would treat her so much better, if she'd just open her eyes.
She won't. You trained her to see you as the low-effort option — the friend who requires zero risk and zero investment. Every favor dug the hole deeper.
The "22 Rules" break the pattern. You'll stop auditioning for a role she already cast and become the man she chases instead. It starts with Rule 1.
Thats because it does not exist.Originally posted by Shiftkey
That definition is outdated. Dictionary.com doesn't even define multiverse.
That is some very flawed logic. You are assuming that by multiverse we mean another universe in a space with our universe, side by side but with a buffer in between. If you read some basic physics, you'd know the universe is expanding and that beyond our edges there is nothing, no fabric of space, motion, existence, universe, nothing. Therefore, another universe would not be buffered by a layer of nothing, it exists in a different layer. Kind of like time, mutliple things can coexist in the same spot provided they're there at another time, same thing with the multiverse theory, except we're not required to be able to navigate the dimensional layer.Originally posted by Spike_the_cowboy
Thats because it does not exist.
You tell me how such a "multiverse" can exist and I'll show you how it can't. I'm sorry, but the theory is flawed. Two universes could not exist parallel to one another without merging into one.
People with bad genetics dont necesarrily have to be dependent on medication and hospitals? no? It takes time for peoples bad genes and illnesses to come out. You may have good genes but still be dependent on hospitals for any number of immediate circumstances.He was making a logical assumption, that's all. And "that way of breeding" most certainly would start right after a nuclear war. How long do you think people dependant on medication and hospitals would survive without that healthcare?
Three seconds. That's how long it took. Your shoes. Your posture. The way you held your drink. Whether you looked at the floor or looked at her.
She already filed you away. Interesting. Boring. Safe. Bold. Before you even opened your mouth.
Everything you say after that is just her confirming what she already decided.
So stop rehearsing lines. Fix the first three seconds. Stand tall. Look up. Smile like you mean it. Walk like you belong wherever you're standing.
The words come later. The impression comes first.
Sure, some people with bad genetics aren't dependant, but many are. He didn't say the gene pool was perfect, he said it was stronger. By taking out the people who depend on health care, despite keeping a few with bad genes who don't depend on it, the gene pool would be stronger. You don't think over 20 years without healthcare would have a way to weed out those with weak genes?People with bad genetics dont necesarrily have to be dependent on medication and hospitals? no? It takes time for peoples bad genes and illnesses to come out. You may have good genes but still be dependent on hospitals for any number of immediate circumstances.
I believe it's possible, but could be a hoax. I don't like jumping on a band wagon of disbelief just because he's bringing bad news. I also think it's pretty incredible that someone could predict the war with Iraq and saying that it's over WMD that don't exist, before 9/11. The USA Patriot Act is also a huge step in the direction of taking away civil liberties - more so than any other recent administration. This was another prediction. The way I see it, only a lucky over the top conspiracy theoriest, a psychic, or a time traveler would make these predictions before 9/11. I don't know of any political analyst who did.Let me ask you something Shift. Do you beleive this guy is telling the truth or are you simply after an arguement?
Afraid not.Ever seen the movie with Kevin Spacey? Forget its name. I think this guy is like him. Reason he disppeared? He finally got admitted to a mental institution.
Wait, are you joking me? I can name you 10 million people on the left who've been screaming that and I can point you to the "Project for a New American Century"'s Rebuilding America's Defenses report which says to take over Iraq under any pretext (pre-9/11). This guy is full of shit. Period. I can't believe how gullible people are on the internet. Mysterious guy comes from the future to kick it on internet forums. Right. And he tells everyone just what he's doing. I'm sorry, these guys are full of shit. Period. And making vague references about potential conflicts, please.Originally posted by Shiftkey
Sure, some people with bad genetics aren't dependant, but many are. He didn't say the gene pool was perfect, he said it was stronger. By taking out the people who depend on health care, despite keeping a few with bad genes who don't depend on it, the gene pool would be stronger. You don't think over 20 years without healthcare would have a way to weed out those with weak genes?
I believe it's possible, but could be a hoax. I don't like jumping on a band wagon of disbelief just because he's bringing bad news. I also think it's pretty incredible that someone could predict the war with Iraq and saying that it's over WMD that don't exist, before 9/11. The USA Patriot Act is also a huge step in the direction of taking away civil liberties - more so than any other recent administration. This was another prediction. The way I see it, only a lucky over the top conspiracy theoriest, a psychic, or a time traveler would make these predictions before 9/11. I don't know of any political analyst who did.
Afraid not.
Most guys accidentally kill attraction before they even speak. They assume they need a bigger bank account, a better physique, or smoother lines. They miss the point.
Female desire operates on a specific set of psychological triggers. Break them, and you're invisible. Follow them, and you become magnetic.
I learned this the hard way. Years of freezing up. Getting friend-zoned. Watching other guys walk away with the girl I wanted. Then I discovered a set of 22 simple rules that rewired my entire approach.
Only smart people did. I have the PNAC document printed, and I had it printed three weeks after it came out. Its clear, whatever "evidence" titor had is a mix between coincidence and common sense, PNAC's documents have been out for a long time and anyone with more than a pound of gray matter has taken note of it at some point.Originally posted by Shiftkey
How long has the public known about PNAC though? I know it was written before 9/11, but did everyone know about it before then?
So If I were to tell you that Im an alien from outerspace desguised as a human conductig reconaissance in order to destroy planet earth then you would beleive me? LOL, you probably would, you would come out and say you beleive me becuase you "dont want to jump on a bandwagon of disbeleif". LOLI don't like jumping on a band wagon of disbelief just because he's bringing bad news.
once again you contridict yourself. your asking for proof on cali's statement, and you have seen literature backing it up, but you say it is "inconclusive" and that is why you dont beleive it. Well, John Titor's evidence for being authentic is inconclusive at best, so why arent you disagreeing with the john titor thing? answer: BECUASE YOU LOVE CONTRIDICTING YOURSELF.Where's the proof California Love? I've read some of the topics on anomalies.com and nothing is conclusive that I've read.
That sentence contains at least five follow-up questions she WANTS you to ask. Where in Florida? What brought you here? How long have you been in the area? What do you miss? How does it compare to here?
She handed them to you on a silver platter. And you said, "Oh cool. I come here every week. I love this band. Ummm... pretty crowded tonight."
She smiled politely. Nodded. And never texted you back.
I was that guy for years. Talking too much. Listening too little. Panicking about my next sentence while she was literally feeding me the answers.
Then I found 22 rules that fixed the whole thing. Rule number one: shut up and listen. She'll tell you exactly what to say.
Hey idiot, your stupid stories didn't work when you tried them at the Timetravel Institute when you called yourself Chronohistorian, why would they work here?Originally posted by time traveler_003
The Mars rovers will discover the element Lunarium.
Pope John Paul will be dead within the next year.
The Iraq war will be lost. Iraq will fall into 4 years of civil war and chaos with the Islamic Revolution gaining control of the country. Iraq becomes an Iranian puppet state.
I will be happy to answer any other questions you may have about the future as long as the information your seeking isn't classified.
Originally posted by Shiftkey
...it wasn't his goal to convince people he was a time traveler. He just wanted to find out about people of this time period...
Most guys accidentally kill attraction before they even speak. They assume they need a bigger bank account, a better physique, or smoother lines. They miss the point.
Female desire operates on a specific set of psychological triggers. Break them, and you're invisible. Follow them, and you become magnetic.
I learned this the hard way. Years of freezing up. Getting friend-zoned. Watching other guys walk away with the girl I wanted. Then I discovered a set of 22 simple rules that rewired my entire approach.