Shiftkey
Master Don Juan
That definition is outdated. Dictionary.com doesn't even define multiverse.
You paid for dinner. You drove. You said "whatever you want is fine" every single time. All the effort, no expectations.
And she left anyway — probably for a guy who makes her pick up the pizza.
Painful. Also predictable. Her mind quietly concludes that anything requiring zero effort from her is worth exactly zero. You became a free sample, and free samples get taken for granted.
The 22 Rules flip the dynamic. Small shifts that get her investing effort, money, and time in you — until SHE'S the one afraid of losing YOU.
You made your case like a lawyer. Stable job. Good guy. Ready for something real. All true. All irrelevant.
She weighed your points, nodded along, felt nothing — then fell hard for some tattooed bartender with a motorcycle and a gambling problem.
Logic is where attraction goes to die. The "22 Rules" work a level deeper, on the subconscious switches that decide within minutes whether you register as a MAN or as part of the furniture.
Stop presenting evidence. Start flipping switches.
Thats because it does not exist.Originally posted by Shiftkey
That definition is outdated. Dictionary.com doesn't even define multiverse.
That is some very flawed logic. You are assuming that by multiverse we mean another universe in a space with our universe, side by side but with a buffer in between. If you read some basic physics, you'd know the universe is expanding and that beyond our edges there is nothing, no fabric of space, motion, existence, universe, nothing. Therefore, another universe would not be buffered by a layer of nothing, it exists in a different layer. Kind of like time, mutliple things can coexist in the same spot provided they're there at another time, same thing with the multiverse theory, except we're not required to be able to navigate the dimensional layer.Originally posted by Spike_the_cowboy
Thats because it does not exist.
You tell me how such a "multiverse" can exist and I'll show you how it can't. I'm sorry, but the theory is flawed. Two universes could not exist parallel to one another without merging into one.
People with bad genetics dont necesarrily have to be dependent on medication and hospitals? no? It takes time for peoples bad genes and illnesses to come out. You may have good genes but still be dependent on hospitals for any number of immediate circumstances.He was making a logical assumption, that's all. And "that way of breeding" most certainly would start right after a nuclear war. How long do you think people dependant on medication and hospitals would survive without that healthcare?
When a woman says it, guys hear a confession. A heads-up. A scheduling conflict.
Here's the translation: I don't feel anything. Right now. With you.
Watch what happens when a man triggers actual attraction. The busy career, the recent breakup, the "not in a place to date" — all of it evaporates instantly. The same woman who was guarding her freedom is suddenly free every night.
The "22 Rules" explain why. When the right switches flip, her timeline rearranges itself around you.
Sure, some people with bad genetics aren't dependant, but many are. He didn't say the gene pool was perfect, he said it was stronger. By taking out the people who depend on health care, despite keeping a few with bad genes who don't depend on it, the gene pool would be stronger. You don't think over 20 years without healthcare would have a way to weed out those with weak genes?People with bad genetics dont necesarrily have to be dependent on medication and hospitals? no? It takes time for peoples bad genes and illnesses to come out. You may have good genes but still be dependent on hospitals for any number of immediate circumstances.
I believe it's possible, but could be a hoax. I don't like jumping on a band wagon of disbelief just because he's bringing bad news. I also think it's pretty incredible that someone could predict the war with Iraq and saying that it's over WMD that don't exist, before 9/11. The USA Patriot Act is also a huge step in the direction of taking away civil liberties - more so than any other recent administration. This was another prediction. The way I see it, only a lucky over the top conspiracy theoriest, a psychic, or a time traveler would make these predictions before 9/11. I don't know of any political analyst who did.Let me ask you something Shift. Do you beleive this guy is telling the truth or are you simply after an arguement?
Afraid not.Ever seen the movie with Kevin Spacey? Forget its name. I think this guy is like him. Reason he disppeared? He finally got admitted to a mental institution.
Wait, are you joking me? I can name you 10 million people on the left who've been screaming that and I can point you to the "Project for a New American Century"'s Rebuilding America's Defenses report which says to take over Iraq under any pretext (pre-9/11). This guy is full of shit. Period. I can't believe how gullible people are on the internet. Mysterious guy comes from the future to kick it on internet forums. Right. And he tells everyone just what he's doing. I'm sorry, these guys are full of shit. Period. And making vague references about potential conflicts, please.Originally posted by Shiftkey
Sure, some people with bad genetics aren't dependant, but many are. He didn't say the gene pool was perfect, he said it was stronger. By taking out the people who depend on health care, despite keeping a few with bad genes who don't depend on it, the gene pool would be stronger. You don't think over 20 years without healthcare would have a way to weed out those with weak genes?
I believe it's possible, but could be a hoax. I don't like jumping on a band wagon of disbelief just because he's bringing bad news. I also think it's pretty incredible that someone could predict the war with Iraq and saying that it's over WMD that don't exist, before 9/11. The USA Patriot Act is also a huge step in the direction of taking away civil liberties - more so than any other recent administration. This was another prediction. The way I see it, only a lucky over the top conspiracy theoriest, a psychic, or a time traveler would make these predictions before 9/11. I don't know of any political analyst who did.
Afraid not.
She calls you when her car breaks down. When she needs help moving. When some guy she's actually dating treats her badly.
You're the listener. The reliable one. The guy who would treat her so much better, if she'd just open her eyes.
She won't. You trained her to see you as the low-effort option — the friend who requires zero risk and zero investment. Every favor dug the hole deeper.
The "22 Rules" break the pattern. You'll stop auditioning for a role she already cast and become the man she chases instead. It starts with Rule 1.
Only smart people did. I have the PNAC document printed, and I had it printed three weeks after it came out. Its clear, whatever "evidence" titor had is a mix between coincidence and common sense, PNAC's documents have been out for a long time and anyone with more than a pound of gray matter has taken note of it at some point.Originally posted by Shiftkey
How long has the public known about PNAC though? I know it was written before 9/11, but did everyone know about it before then?
So If I were to tell you that Im an alien from outerspace desguised as a human conductig reconaissance in order to destroy planet earth then you would beleive me? LOL, you probably would, you would come out and say you beleive me becuase you "dont want to jump on a bandwagon of disbeleif". LOLI don't like jumping on a band wagon of disbelief just because he's bringing bad news.
once again you contridict yourself. your asking for proof on cali's statement, and you have seen literature backing it up, but you say it is "inconclusive" and that is why you dont beleive it. Well, John Titor's evidence for being authentic is inconclusive at best, so why arent you disagreeing with the john titor thing? answer: BECUASE YOU LOVE CONTRIDICTING YOURSELF.Where's the proof California Love? I've read some of the topics on anomalies.com and nothing is conclusive that I've read.
You've said it a hundred times. Maybe a thousand. And every time you say it, you train your brain to freeze the next time she walks into the room.
Leagues are a myth invented by guys who are scared of women.
She's a person. She has bad breath in the morning. She picks songs she can't sing in the shower. She overthinks her own texts.
Walk over. Say something. The league dissolves the second you open your mouth.
Hey idiot, your stupid stories didn't work when you tried them at the Timetravel Institute when you called yourself Chronohistorian, why would they work here?Originally posted by time traveler_003
The Mars rovers will discover the element Lunarium.
Pope John Paul will be dead within the next year.
The Iraq war will be lost. Iraq will fall into 4 years of civil war and chaos with the Islamic Revolution gaining control of the country. Iraq becomes an Iranian puppet state.
I will be happy to answer any other questions you may have about the future as long as the information your seeking isn't classified.
Originally posted by Shiftkey
...it wasn't his goal to convince people he was a time traveler. He just wanted to find out about people of this time period...
When a woman says it, guys hear a confession. A heads-up. A scheduling conflict.
Here's the translation: I don't feel anything. Right now. With you.
Watch what happens when a man triggers actual attraction. The busy career, the recent breakup, the "not in a place to date" — all of it evaporates instantly. The same woman who was guarding her freedom is suddenly free every night.
The "22 Rules" explain why. When the right switches flip, her timeline rearranges itself around you.