in retrospect about falling in love w/ a chick

[john_1234]

thinking about past relationships, i realized i was truly in love two times. both these girls were very attractive. however, w/out getting too deep into it, their personalities weren't the best. i've dated girls who weren't beautiful, I rate them a 7 at most. but a few of these 7's had fun/spunky personalities. my feelings for them never grew to "love" but probably infatuation at most. I think like, "damn, if only soandso had soandso's personality.." then that's a girl i'd consider for the long haul.
this may be shallow, but my feelings for a girl could only grow to true love only if i find her really attractive. for a girl who's average, cute, etc., my feelings will NEVER reach the point of love regardless of how great her personality maybe. do most guys relate to this?

 

[specialed]

i do...girl has to at least be cute in order for me to even consider her as a potential girlfriend or more. Simple as that.

 

[blinkwatt]

i do...girl has to at least be cute in order for me to even consider her as a potential girlfriend or more. Simple as that.

Same here,but here is the catch. If they are at least cute,that's an automatic pass to a shot at me if they tried. If they have a good personality their looks automatically sky rocket with their personality in my book.

 

[donjuanjovi]

So basically you're asking if I'd date an ugly girl?

No, I would not date an ugly girl. I would be friends with one, but it would go no further.

I think you may be seeing infatuation as love. I could be wrong though. Just my impressions.

 

[Delta]

lesser girls ARE deeper and have more complexity in their personal makeup and don't have the complexes of hot chicks.

this is why the best of all worlds are chicks who were not always hot. who've known both worlds.

this is probably the best balanced of chicks.

"hit weight watchers! hot girls for fat chick prices!" says fez....

delta