If you were an OnlyFans simp, would you pay for this chunky chick?

[MatureDJ]

OnlyFans Creators Say They've 'Lost Trust' in Platform After Pornography Ban Reversal: 'Not Happy'

"I want to be part of a platform that is not just tolerant of sex workers, but lovingly accepts them and stands up for them," says Courtney Tillia

autos.yahoo.com

my opinion: If I were going to simp, it would be for a chick that looks a lot better than than this.

(NOTE: I'm referring to the first chick pictured in the article.)

 

[BackInTheGame78]

It's the same woman. I'd fvck the sh!t out of her. Wouldn't pay for it tho. And I'd never pay to look at them.

 

[corrector]

OnlyFans Creators Say They've 'Lost Trust' in Platform After Pornography Ban Reversal: 'Not Happy'

"I want to be part of a platform that is not just tolerant of sex workers, but lovingly accepts them and stands up for them," says Courtney Tillia

autos.yahoo.com

my opinion: If I were going to simp, it would be for a chick that looks a lot better than than this.

(NOTE: I'm referring to the first chick pictured in the article.)

Depends on what the subscription price is and how many pics or vids are there. Again I am still no porn, no fap so that is hypothetical. To date I have not spent a penny on OF and started no fap, no porn not long after discovering that site.

 

[Serenity]

Chunky chick? What the hell are your looks standards man?

I'd fvck her if she's also cool. I would never pay for sex though, much less if it's just pictures and videos.

 

[BillyPilgrim]

She's got a great rack

Her husband is a mindset coach and a #gamechanger, with all the usual fake slogans on his site.

I emailed him, "What are some effective strategies for thriving in a morally corrupt world devoid of common sense and courtesy, and run by a genocidal government imposing a fraudulent medical totalitarianism?"

I have yet to hear back.

 

[corrector]

She's got a great rack

Her husband is a mindset coach and a #gamechanger, with all the usual fake slogans on his site.

I emailed him, "What are some effective strategies for thriving in a morally corrupt world devoid of common sense and courtesy, and run by a genocidal government imposing a fraudulent medical totalitarianism?"

I have yet to hear back.

She is married? Oh, did not know that. In that case I would not be interested in seeing any of her pics or videos because that would be adultery. I would never deal with anyone married or seperated.

 

[HaleyBaron]

I couldnt find a single attractive woman in that photo shot. I almost thought of the blonde to the right, but she looks old af.

 

[Solomon]

Chunky? this is above average where I live in the midwest
She is what i would call "Slim thick" my favorite
I don't pay for OF never have never will to many women out there to resort to this

 

[taiyuu_otoko]

She is married?

Though Tillia, a former teacher and mom of four, says she has been making a six-figure salary on OnlyFans, the reversal has led to a loss of trust.

 

[Robert28]

She’s a bombshell in the first pic. The other two doesn’t even look like her. She looks completely different from pic #1 and pic #3

 

[Modern Man Advice]

OnlyFans Creators Say They've 'Lost Trust' in Platform After Pornography Ban Reversal: 'Not Happy'

"I want to be part of a platform that is not just tolerant of sex workers, but lovingly accepts them and stands up for them," says Courtney Tillia

autos.yahoo.com

my opinion: If I were going to simp, it would be for a chick that looks a lot better than than this.

(NOTE: I'm referring to the first chick pictured in the article.)

I personally wouldn't call it chunky, unless your standards are these anorexic-looking women. Which, again personally, I find very unattractive. She looks normal. Not my type but def wouldn't hesitate to go for it.

Now to your point, men should never pay for any type of sexual advance. Whether virtual, platonic, or physical. To me, it just screams scarcity and thirst. Two very unattractive and unnatural male qualities.

Our evolution has shown us that men should live in an abundance mindset with so many options, we get to say yay or nay to whether we want to commit or not.

Modern Man Advice

 

[EyeBRollin]

Now to your point, men should never pay for any type of sexual advance. Whether virtual, platonic, or physical. To me, it just screams scarcity and thirst. Two very unattractive and unnatural male qualities.

I would never pay for sex though, much less if it's just pictures and videos.

I'd fvck the sh!t out of her. Wouldn't pay for it tho. And I'd never pay to look at them.

I always wondered why the concept transactional relations elicits such strong response from some fellas. All interactions with women are transactional. Even if you don’t pay for the act directly it still requires time or money to get any progress with a woman. They are literal time/money pits. The former is more expensive…

 

[corrector]

I always wondered why the concept transactional relations elicits such strong response from some fellas. All interactions with women are transactional. Even if you don’t pay for the act directly it still requires time or money to get any progress with a woman. They are literal time/money pits. The former is more expensive…

Yeah, especially if you are paying something like 99 cents for a month subscription and you have allot of videos and pics (I'm no fap/no porn at moment and don't have any paid subscriptions to OF)), it's like, oh no, that is so beta-male, how dare you spend 99 cents, you have just blown up the internet and disgraced mankind!!!

To be honest, in the past year, not recently, but I'm talking about like January, February, etc.. this year, I toyed with the idea of subscribing to OF, but the shame of pressing any payment on the credit card, or going there, especially from this board, played with my head and I just couldn't do it. So, what people are saying on here I think resonate with that inner man that doesn't want to even give an inch to simpery. It took me a while to get to the point to even get one free subscription before starting an official no fap/no porn thing and cutting it all out.

The masculine shame is real for paying on those sites. Do you have a subscription yourself? After all, it's all transactional, right?

 

[Mike32ct]

I always wondered why the concept transactional relations elicits such strong response from some fellas. All interactions with women are transactional. Even if you don’t pay for the act directly it still requires time or money to get any progress with a woman. They are literal time/money pits. The former is more expensive…

Good question. I think that men sometimes F for an ego boost. I don’t think it’s always due to their libido only.

Having said that, a big part of that ego boost is feeling wanted or desired. If the guy has “She only did it with me because of $$” in his head, it spoils the ego boost associated with being genuinely wanted.

 

[EyeBRollin]

Having said that, a big part of that ego boost is feeling wanted or desired. If the guy has “She only did it with me because of $$” in his head, it spoils the ego boost associated with being genuinely wanted.

Women at their core are security seeking creatures. They want resources and provisioning. The lizard brain that stimulates her attraction is just reacting to what she perceives on an instinctual level provides that. I don’t know why guys take it so personally.

“There are no ugly millionaires.”

 

[Mike32ct]

Women at their core are security seeking creatures. They want resources and provisioning. The lizard brain that stimulates her attraction is just reacting to what she perceives on an instinctual level provides that. I don’t know why guys take it so personally.

“There are no ugly millionaires.”

Understood. But for some reason, many guys would prefer to be wanted on the basis of looks if they can. Not saying that’s right or wrong, but it’s common.

 

[Who Dares Win]

I always wondered why the concept transactional relations elicits such strong response from some fellas. All interactions with women are transactional. Even if you don’t pay for the act directly it still requires time or money to get any progress with a woman. They are literal time/money pits. The former is more expensive…

Cause men would gladly "pay" without paying, think of the hot guy that "pays" by giving her temporary status by banging her.

Agree that we all pay somehow but paying with money and time seems heavier than paying with what mother nature gave you for free so its actually her paying the bill.

Not sure if I explained myself, think of hot goodlooking guy whos payment consists in sharing with women what mother nature give him for free compared to a wealthy guy paying with stuff he had to work for.