I think sometimes if u pour it on thick it can work

[_sideways_]

Like if you're super poetic....that's as good as an 8 pack

 

[Korrupt]

Different strokes for different folks. One girl might think a poetic guy is romantic and charming, while another might think he's a total faggot.

Some girls like muscles, some (due to insecurity) prefer a softer body on a guy because it's less intimidating and she can feel like the catch.

The things ALL girls like are: Tall, hair on head, money, social status/fame/power, good looking face. Unfortunately, you can't control genetics.

 

[FCB]

Environment matters. Just like how women are influenced by social proof and what other women say, if they are in an environment or highly regard artistic types then that person will have high value to them. It may not be the best way to hold a women's interest long term without other standard Alpha tendencies but value is all perceived, and skills are always valuable, more so when they are something a person really identifies with.

 

[Glumix]

And some like super-BETA ugly guys so they can bulldoze them down and feel oh soooooooooooooooooooooooooo powerful.

 

[FCB]

Gonna just end this topic right now. Look at musicians, specifically guys who were sex symbols like Mick Jagger and countless others and who had lots of feminine tendencies, those guys were getting more women then anyone on the planet and it wasn't because they were super good looking. You can give a girl tingles in lots of different ways and being very skillfull at something is almost always going to be a big draw, the average dude can't really pull that off but women will overlook certain traits if they really value someone's skill.

 

[FCB]

I agree with your point on the skills, but disagree that musicians get pvssy because they have a good voice or can strum a guitar. They got pvssy because of their status bro. And fame. And wealth. I bet most girls tried to poke holes in their condoms.

My point wasn't that they were getting ***** because of their good voice or strumming a guitar but still that isn't a completely correct statement. They got their status because of those skills, they stuck out from the crowd which very likely led them to have more options/confidence and it snowballed. The key is its all perceived and really bull****, we all know that what a women feels is what drives her. If a women feels in her mind that a good singer is the complete alpha then she will treat him as such, if he reinforces that (if others think the same he'd be much more likely to do so and get the snowball moving) then that's all that matters. In society we've put high value on skilled entertainers, I know some musicians that don't have status or fame, they play in small bands without much fanfare but they get way more and higher quality girls then if they weren't.

Many women deep down want to recreate relationships with there fathers for one reason or the other, its not logical or valueable to them but based on experiences they are driven towards that. In society we create the value of musicians and entertainers, we are told over and over that these people are celebrities that walk on water. Now take a run of the mill musician or poet (who are basically singers without the voice) and they don't even have to be great because a bunch of women will still associate those people with that value/fame/status which is really all that matters (they are getting laid).

Its all perception and association which has layers on layers in society and peoples minds.