Still butthurt over being called out for being a dummie in the other thread lol.
“The 22 Rules That Flip the Script With Women… And How You Can Use Them Tonight”
Most guys accidentally kill attraction before they even speak. They assume they need a bigger bank account, a better physique, or smoother lines. They miss the point.
Female desire operates on a specific set of psychological triggers. Break them, and you're invisible. Follow them, and you become magnetic.
I learned this the hard way. Years of freezing up. Getting friend-zoned. Watching other guys walk away with the girl I wanted. Then I discovered a set of 22 simple rules that rewired my entire approach.
How To Assess Credibility of Dating Claims of Online Posters
- Thread starter curtsilv
- Start date
Just because a woman listens to you and acts interested in what you say doesn't mean she really is. She might just be acting polite, while silently wishing that the date would hurry up and end, or that you would go away... and never come back.
Quote taken from The SoSuave Guide to Women and Dating, which you can read for FREE.
A lot of those guys made an ass ton of money though. David D and Neil Strauss in particular. RSD is still pulling the same scam. It's amazing how guliible people are. When the topic is sex, people just can't think rationally about the issue.
Even on this forum, someone like beexcellent, a 50 year old who claims to look late 20's, gets a pass. No one calls her on her bull-sh-t.
No one asks for proof of anything, much less demands it.
devilkingx2
Master Don Juan
Lmao that would be a bit of a dated method
Nowadays i do actually opt fot a Snapchat over a number though. So maybe it has just evolved
devilkingx2
Master Don Juan
?????
There's like half a dozen users that have sh!tting on the female posters down to a science or an art form (I think they're all banned now for a variety of mostly similar reasons though)
BeExcellent specifically has been memed on for being the female version of bigneil (this guy who would boast about how awesome he was 24/7 if he could find a way to fit it into his post)
What are you talking about lmao
devilkingx2
Master Don Juan
It's interesting that you dodged the point that most women wouldn't want to lie upwards and are more likely to exclude things as "not counting", meaning that 7 is a lowball.
It's also interesting that you think that you need scientific methodology for as simple and basic of a question as "how many people have you fvcked?". (Anybody pretending to not know what that means is intentionally fudging their numbers and would lie about it either way)
It's interesting that you didn't even read the study you cited.
It's pretty obvious you have no idea how the study was conducted and therefore are clueless about why the results are 100% invalid. You are hellbent on remaining ignorant which is your choice. Stupid is as stupid does.You don't need "scientific methodology" to know "how many people fvcked." However, you need a clear definition of what fvcking means, and these pseudo scientists have no clue since they never defined it. Besides, you don't even know what scientific methodology even means. You are too dense to have a meaningful discussion with, much less an intelligent one.
I have yet to see even a single post calling her out as the lying old hag that she is. I'm the only one doing it.
devilkingx2
Master Don Juan
That's because Bigneil, Urbanyst, Tenacity and RichardTheFrog are all banned.