"The Coffee Shop Girl You Never Spoke To"

You've replayed it a hundred times. She stood three feet away, scrolling her phone. You had an opening. You composed the perfect line — after she was gone.

For all you know, she's married now. To some guy who said something. Anything.

Openers are cheap. Almost any sentence works when it's delivered within three seconds. The expensive part is the standing there, drafting and deleting, while the window quietly closes.

The "22 Rules" stripped out my hesitation. What to open with, how to keep it alive, and the one habit that costs guys more women than anything else: waiting for perfect.

Read more...

How To Assess Credibility of Dating Claims of Online Posters

curtsilv

Banned
Joined
Nov 10, 2018
Messages
104
Reaction score
46
It was pure cringe back then, too, as is anything like it, IMO. It is the entire reason I find the term PUA to be moronic.

Even sadder than that is the fact he is being referenced in threads like this one as an example of what a person thinks game or seduction is, is in itself pathetic.
Still butthurt over being called out for being a dummie in the other thread lol.
 

"Why Women Dump the Guys Who Try the Hardest"

You paid for dinner. You drove. You said "whatever you want is fine" every single time. All the effort, no expectations.

And she left anyway — probably for a guy who makes her pick up the pizza.

Painful. Also predictable. Her mind quietly concludes that anything requiring zero effort from her is worth exactly zero. You became a free sample, and free samples get taken for granted.

The 22 Rules flip the dynamic. Small shifts that get her investing effort, money, and time in you — until SHE'S the one afraid of losing YOU.

Read more...

curtsilv

Banned
Joined
Nov 10, 2018
Messages
104
Reaction score
46
That reminds me of the David D guy whose gimmick was to ask a girl for their email address instead of their phone number....because he was all hip and high tech like that. Can you imagine that line today? "Hey babe, what's your email address?" LOL
A lot of those guys made an ass ton of money though. David D and Neil Strauss in particular. RSD is still pulling the same scam. It's amazing how guliible people are. When the topic is sex, people just can't think rationally about the issue.

Even on this forum, someone like beexcellent, a 50 year old who claims to look late 20's, gets a pass. No one calls her on her bull-sh-t.

No one asks for proof of anything, much less demands it.
 

devilkingx2

Master Don Juan
Joined
Jul 9, 2013
Messages
4,521
Reaction score
2,229
Location
NYC
That reminds me of the David D guy whose gimmick was to ask a girl for their email address instead of their phone number....because he was all hip and high tech like that. Can you imagine that line today? "Hey babe, what's your email address?" LOL
Lmao that would be a bit of a dated method

Nowadays i do actually opt fot a Snapchat over a number though. So maybe it has just evolved
 

devilkingx2

Master Don Juan
Joined
Jul 9, 2013
Messages
4,521
Reaction score
2,229
Location
NYC
Even on this forum, someone like beexcellent, a 50 year old who claims to look late 20's, gets a pass. No one calls her on her bull-sh-t.
?????

There's like half a dozen users that have sh!tting on the female posters down to a science or an art form (I think they're all banned now for a variety of mostly similar reasons though)

BeExcellent specifically has been memed on for being the female version of bigneil (this guy who would boast about how awesome he was 24/7 if he could find a way to fit it into his post)

What are you talking about lmao
 

devilkingx2

Master Don Juan
Joined
Jul 9, 2013
Messages
4,521
Reaction score
2,229
Location
NYC
You obviously did not even look at much less read the study you cited. This is the third time I've pointed this out so obviously facts don't matter to you, but your so-called "study" not only recorded guesstimates of sex partners (completely invalid and unreliable) but doesn't even define sex. It can refer to anything: actual intercourse, oral, or even heavy petting, spooning, kissing or imaginary sex. It's 100% invalid.
It's interesting that you dodged the point that most women wouldn't want to lie upwards and are more likely to exclude things as "not counting", meaning that 7 is a lowball.

It's also interesting that you think that you need scientific methodology for as simple and basic of a question as "how many people have you fvcked?". (Anybody pretending to not know what that means is intentionally fudging their numbers and would lie about it either way)
 

"She's Out of Your League"

You've said it a hundred times. Maybe a thousand. And every time you say it, you train your brain to freeze the next time she walks into the room.

Leagues are a myth invented by guys who are scared of women.

She's a person. She has bad breath in the morning. She picks songs she can't sing in the shower. She overthinks her own texts.

Walk over. Say something. The league dissolves the second you open your mouth.

Read more...

curtsilv

Banned
Joined
Nov 10, 2018
Messages
104
Reaction score
46
It's interesting that you dodged the point that most women wouldn't want to lie upwards and are more likely to exclude things as "not counting", meaning that 7 is a lowball.

It's also interesting that you think that you need scientific methodology for as simple and basic of a question as "how many people have you fvcked?". (Anybody pretending to not know what that means is intentionally fudging their numbers and would lie about it either way)
It's interesting that you didn't even read the study you cited. :) It's pretty obvious you have no idea how the study was conducted and therefore are clueless about why the results are 100% invalid. You are hellbent on remaining ignorant which is your choice. Stupid is as stupid does.

You don't need "scientific methodology" to know "how many people fvcked." However, you need a clear definition of what fvcking means, and these pseudo scientists have no clue since they never defined it. Besides, you don't even know what scientific methodology even means. You are too dense to have a meaningful discussion with, much less an intelligent one.
 

curtsilv

Banned
Joined
Nov 10, 2018
Messages
104
Reaction score
46
?????

There's like half a dozen users that have sh!tting on the female posters down to a science or an art form (I think they're all banned now for a variety of mostly similar reasons though)

BeExcellent specifically has been memed on for being the female version of bigneil (this guy who would boast about how awesome he was 24/7 if he could find a way to fit it into his post)

What are you talking about lmao
I have yet to see even a single post calling her out as the lying old hag that she is. I'm the only one doing it.
 

devilkingx2

Master Don Juan
Joined
Jul 9, 2013
Messages
4,521
Reaction score
2,229
Location
NYC
I have yet to see even a single post calling her out as the lying old hag that she is. I'm the only one doing it.
That's because Bigneil, Urbanyst, Tenacity and RichardTheFrog are all banned.
 
Top