RaWBLooD
Master Don Juan
relax manOriginally posted by ( . )( . )
Yeah its sucks, this has to be one of my pet hates.
.
no hate
more love.:woo:
That sentence contains at least five follow-up questions she WANTS you to ask. Where in Florida? What brought you here? How long have you been in the area? What do you miss? How does it compare to here?
She handed them to you on a silver platter. And you said, "Oh cool. I come here every week. I love this band. Ummm... pretty crowded tonight."
She smiled politely. Nodded. And never texted you back.
I was that guy for years. Talking too much. Listening too little. Panicking about my next sentence while she was literally feeding me the answers.
Then I found 22 rules that fixed the whole thing. Rule number one: shut up and listen. She'll tell you exactly what to say.
relax manOriginally posted by ( . )( . )
Yeah its sucks, this has to be one of my pet hates.
.
You've replayed it a hundred times. She stood three feet away, scrolling her phone. You had an opening. You composed the perfect line — after she was gone.
For all you know, she's married now. To some guy who said something. Anything.
Openers are cheap. Almost any sentence works when it's delivered within three seconds. The expensive part is the standing there, drafting and deleting, while the window quietly closes.
The "22 Rules" stripped out my hesitation. What to open with, how to keep it alive, and the one habit that costs guys more women than anything else: waiting for perfect.
Perhaps it seems like an egotistical stance, but yes, I probably am happy to be able to say that I resisted the temptation to snoop - As are all of you, apparently, considering the fact that you're all taking this "moral" position by arguing this point in the first place.Originally posted by TesuqueRed
Ditch the unrealistic idealistic standards of people respecting each other's privacy. We're all snoops, we're all fascinated by each other as a general rule.
Repeat that: as a general rule.
And if you're one of those exceptions don't bother posting because either it's an egotistical stance ("well I don't and (unstated) so I'm better than you...) or a meaningless exception to the general rule.
Exactly!Originally posted by mrRuckus
i wouldn't even want to look in my gf's phone. i know she's popular and has a zillion male and female friends and if i started reading msgs i'd just get jealous so i save myself the trouble.
All i know is that most of her txt msgs are to me and she always answers promptly and she does me on a regular basis and that's good enough for me.
nah those who would steal that would be the ones who would be smarter than your stupid ass !Just like you wouldn't leave $1,000 laying on the seat of your car with the door unlocked...
Those who steal also have no respect for the boundaries of others. [/B]
She asks it casually, mid-sip. And you feel the floor open up, because the honest answer is work, gym, and a couple shows you're half-watching.
Women rarely say this out loud, but a man with a life is attractive before he says a word. The guy who spent Saturday deep-sea fishing and came back with photos and a story — he walks in already interesting.
The "22 Rules" pushed me to build a life worth talking about. Turns out the fastest way to be interesting to women is to be interested in your own life first.
Hah, those who steal have mammas and priests/ministers/rabbis who failed to teach them "ethics" and "honisty"!!Originally posted by RaWBLooD
nah those who would steal that would be the ones who would be smarter than your stupid ass !
Y'know it's obvious that it's easier to steal $1,000 bucks laying on the seat of an unlocked car than it is to earn that $1,000 bucks. Although I do not believe that this site is condoning this sort of "take the easy way out" mentality when it comes to picking up chicks.Originally posted by RaWBLooD
nah those who would steal that would be the ones who would be smarter than your stupid ass !