“The 22 Rules That Flip the Script With Women… And How You Can Use Them Tonight”

Most guys accidentally kill attraction before they even speak. They assume they need a bigger bank account, a better physique, or smoother lines. They miss the point.

Female desire operates on a specific set of psychological triggers.  Break them, and you're invisible. Follow them, and you become magnetic.

I learned this the hard way. Years of freezing up. Getting friend-zoned. Watching other guys walk away with the girl I wanted. Then I discovered a set of 22 simple rules that rewired my entire approach.

Read more...

House passes bill that could lead to a TikTok ban; fight shifts to the Senate

Pierce Manhammer

Moderator
Joined
Jun 2, 2021
Messages
4,909
Reaction score
5,884
Location
PRC
Given what is being discussed it would seem that at least a few of the posters in this thread think that “da gubmint” wants to shut down TikTok. It doesn’t, it wants the Chinese to sell their portion of its control to a US based buyer, who is subject to US laws and not just be able to collect our information for a foreign, and hostile government intelligence apparatus.

The main issue is its ownership not that anyone wants to stifle “free speech”. Don’t be a low information poster.
 

Just because a woman listens to you and acts interested in what you say doesn't mean she really is. She might just be acting polite, while silently wishing that the date would hurry up and end, or that you would go away... and never come back.

Quote taken from The SoSuave Guide to Women and Dating, which you can read for FREE.

BaronOfHair

Master Don Juan
Joined
Feb 14, 2024
Messages
5,099
Reaction score
2,672
Age
37
So, when we talk about the whole "public square" idea in relation to the First Amendment, it gets a bit tricky with online forums. See, the First Amendment is all about keeping the government from messing with our speech and gatherings, ensuring we can speak our minds freely in public spaces. But here's the twist: online forums aren't really public spaces in the legal sense because private companies run them. It's like they're inviting us into their digital living rooms to chat.

These companies get to set the house rules, deciding what can and can't be said on their platforms. So, if they want to remove a post or moderate a discussion, they're totally within their rights without stepping on First Amendment toes. It's a bit like having a metaphorical digital public square, where we all gather to share ideas and opinions, but without the same legal protections you'd find in a physical town square.

Now, there's a ton of ongoing chatter about how these digital platforms fit into our world of free speech, especially considering how big a role they play in our conversations today. People are debating whether there should be some balance between allowing free speech and keeping the online world safe from harm, misinformation, and the like. And then there's the big question: should these digital gathering spots be regulated somehow because of their massive influence on public discourse?

The TikTok discussion also begs a question about The Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution that speaks of the right of people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures. It states that this right shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized. This amendment provides a fundamental protection against arbitrary governmental intrusion.

Given the Chinese routinely breach privacy in collecting information from the US aka espionage.

All my points are made in the spirit of “you cannot have it both ways”.

Yeah... There's a larger conversation to be had regarding the culture of free speech https://www.thefire.org/news/free-speech-culture-elon-musk-and-twitter , and the shi-ty state it's currently in. The law and policy aren't helpful, when a substantial portion of the citizenry believes that they're doing God's work, by stifling speech they deem either "Problematic" or(on the other end of the sociopolitical continuum) "Blue Pill"

Both of which are just stand-in terms for blasphemy/heresy
 

BaronOfHair

Master Don Juan
Joined
Feb 14, 2024
Messages
5,099
Reaction score
2,672
Age
37
Given what is being discussed it would seem that at least a few of the posters in this thread think that “da gubmint” wants to shut down TikTok. It doesn’t, it wants the Chinese to sell their portion of its control to a US based buyer, who is subject to US laws and not just be able to collect our information for a foreign, and hostile government intelligence apparatus.

The main issue is its ownership not that anyone wants to stifle “free speech”. Don’t be a low information poster.
The US government admits outright that they're forcing a corporation to sell TikTok, under pain of it being banned if they don't. We can try to write what I'm about to say off as a slippery slope argument, nonetheless: If Big Brother succeeds here, how much longer do we think it will be before they start pulling crap like this with private businesses here in The States?
 

Pierce Manhammer

Moderator
Joined
Jun 2, 2021
Messages
4,909
Reaction score
5,884
Location
PRC
How do you propose we deal with the issue at hand? The Chinese government conducting surveillance on the US population?
 

BaronOfHair

Master Don Juan
Joined
Feb 14, 2024
Messages
5,099
Reaction score
2,672
Age
37
How do you propose we deal with the issue at hand? The Chinese government conducting surveillance on the US population?
I question the notion that Red China(Or anyone else, for that matter)needs TikTok to gain personal information about Americans, along with the assertion that transferring it into American hands will cripple anyone's capacity for espionage. We speak as if accessing personal information hasn't, for the past two decades now, been easier than persuading Emily Ratajkowki to walk around in public naked, when this is demonstrably untrue
 
Last edited:

What happens, IN HER MIND, is that she comes to see you as WORTHLESS simply because she hasn't had to INVEST anything in you in order to get you or to keep you.

You were an interesting diversion while she had nothing else to do. But now that someone a little more valuable has come along, someone who expects her to treat him very well, she'll have no problem at all dropping you or demoting you to lowly "friendship" status.

Quote taken from The SoSuave Guide to Women and Dating, which you can read for FREE.

MatureDJ

Master Don Juan
Joined
Apr 30, 2006
Messages
12,438
Reaction score
5,028
An online property is not the “public square” it is private property so 1st Amendment rights do not apply, if they did I could demand that the New York Times publish my oped.

no shirt, no shoes, no service

p.s. the Chinese are up to no good, we know this they engage in spycraft in the US all the time - last week another scientist was convicted. If you think they’re not enabling in shady Shiite with TikTok you’re not paying attention.
Actually, back when there were few media outlets (i.e., pre-internet), there was a law that said that if a station aired an opinion, an interested party could demand that the station show a contrary opinion as per that party. With the internet, of course, every website is a station.
 

Pierce Manhammer

Moderator
Joined
Jun 2, 2021
Messages
4,909
Reaction score
5,884
Location
PRC
Well you're free to hold your own opinion on this, I'd rather heed the warnings of the experts:







I question the notion that Red China(Or anyone else, for that matter)needs TikTok to gain personal information about Americans, along with the assertion that transferring it into American hands will cripple anyone's capacity for espionage. We speak as if accessing personal information hasn't, for the past two decades now, been easier than persuading Emily Ratajkowki to walk around in public naked, when this is demonstrably untrue
 

BaronOfHair

Master Don Juan
Joined
Feb 14, 2024
Messages
5,099
Reaction score
2,672
Age
37
Well you're free to hold your own opinion on this, I'd rather heed the warnings of the experts:







It's likely too late to prevent The House from going through with this. I'm inclined to wonder out loud again though: Do we really believe that The US government won't now be emboldened to pull similar crap with corporations here in The US, using national security as a pre-text?
 

Pierce Manhammer

Moderator
Joined
Jun 2, 2021
Messages
4,909
Reaction score
5,884
Location
PRC
It's likely too late to prevent The House from going through with this. I'm inclined to wonder out loud again though: Do we really believe that The US government won't now be emboldened to pull similar crap with corporations here in The US, using national security as a pre-text?
Possibly but so is the possibility of a number of things.
 

“The 22 Rules That Turned Me From Invisible to Irresistible With Women… Starting Tonight”

You can skip the expensive cars, the fancy clothes, and the endless gym selfies. Completely unnecessary.

I used to freeze the second a beautiful woman looked my way. Frustrated. Awkward. Watching other guys walk away with the girl while I stood there tongue-tied.

Then I discovered 22 simple rules that rewired my entire dating life. The anxiety vanished. Conversations flowed effortlessly. Women started chasing me for a change.

These rules trigger a woman's subconscious attraction switches. And you can start using them tonight.

Read more...

Bokanovsky

Master Don Juan
Joined
Jul 7, 2012
Messages
5,390
Reaction score
5,497

Bokanovsky

Master Don Juan
Joined
Jul 7, 2012
Messages
5,390
Reaction score
5,497
I agree. The issue is that the Chinese Gov. are in control of TikTok and are spying on Americans. The Chinese Gov. controls just about every aspect of their citizens life. They control your bank account....look it up.
If I were American, I'd be more concerned about my own government spying on me.
 

Mertz09

Senior Don Juan
Joined
Jan 11, 2024
Messages
229
Reaction score
147
Location
Houston Tx.
An online property is not the “public square” it is private property so 1st Amendment rights do not apply, if they did I could demand that the New York Times publish my oped.

no shirt, no shoes, no service

p.s. the Chinese are up to no good, we know this they engage in spycraft in the US all the time - last week another scientist was convicted. If you think they’re not enabling in shady Shiite with TikTok you’re not paying attention.
Agreed. 100%
 

Millard Fillmore

Master Don Juan
Joined
Mar 9, 2023
Messages
814
Reaction score
794
An online property is not the “public square” it is private property so 1st Amendment rights do not apply, if they did I could demand that the New York Times publish my oped.
The first amendment applies to protecting any speech from government suppression. A content based app is no different from a printing press.
 

“The 22 Rules That Turned Me From Invisible to Irresistible With Women… Starting Tonight”

You can skip the expensive cars, the fancy clothes, and the endless gym selfies. Completely unnecessary.

I used to freeze the second a beautiful woman looked my way. Frustrated. Awkward. Watching other guys walk away with the girl while I stood there tongue-tied.

Then I discovered 22 simple rules that rewired my entire dating life. The anxiety vanished. Conversations flowed effortlessly. Women started chasing me for a change.

These rules trigger a woman's subconscious attraction switches. And you can start using them tonight.

Read more...

Top