"Why Women Dump the Guys Who Try the Hardest"

You paid for dinner. You drove. You said "whatever you want is fine" every single time. All the effort, no expectations.

And she left anyway — probably for a guy who makes her pick up the pizza.

Painful. Also predictable. Her mind quietly concludes that anything requiring zero effort from her is worth exactly zero. You became a free sample, and free samples get taken for granted.

The 22 Rules flip the dynamic. Small shifts that get her investing effort, money, and time in you — until SHE'S the one afraid of losing YOU.

Read more...

History, why society is beta

cervantesscthree

Don Juan
Joined
Aug 4, 2013
Messages
132
Reaction score
3
Location
UK
I hear a lot of talk about the feminine imperative, and how all guys are born into a world shoving the beta mind frame up there arses. 100% right. I want all guys to have game, but, a lot of people (men) forget/ignore why the feminine imperative came about. 100-200 years ago being a woman was not a good thing to be, and men weren't too nice to them either.

I just think it's important people remember that this current matriarchy (if you want to call it that) is a response to the harshness of the previous ruling patriarchy. Males are now suffering for their past behaviours. I just hope one day we can all be free from it.
 

"How I Made Sure No Woman Ever Friend-Zoned Me Again"

She calls you when her car breaks down. When she needs help moving. When some guy she's actually dating treats her badly.

You're the listener. The reliable one. The guy who would treat her so much better, if she'd just open her eyes.

She won't. You trained her to see you as the low-effort option — the friend who requires zero risk and zero investment. Every favor dug the hole deeper.

The "22 Rules" break the pattern. You'll stop auditioning for a role she already cast and become the man she chases instead. It starts with Rule 1.

Read more...

Jair213

Master Don Juan
Joined
Feb 28, 2012
Messages
852
Reaction score
38
Location
Los Angeles
cervantesscthree said:
I hear a lot of talk about the feminine imperative, and how all guys are born into a world shoving the beta mind frame up there arses. 100% right. I want all guys to have game, but, a lot of people (men) forget/ignore why the feminine imperative came about. 100-200 years ago being a woman was not a good thing to be, and men weren't too nice to them either.

I just think it's important people remember that this current matriarchy (if you want to call it that) is a response to the harshness of the previous ruling patriarchy. Males are now suffering for their past behaviours. I just hope one day we can all be free from it.
yes sir you are right! although you might have some dudes come in this thread start bashing you for this!

if you also study history you see how men were cruel to woman in the past! dont wanna get in to detail but it was really fvcked tup for them! not only that but fathers forcing there young daughters to marry powerful old man they didnt want to marry just to secure more power them selfs withing there family trees and other senseless sh!t they went through!
 

cervantesscthree

Don Juan
Joined
Aug 4, 2013
Messages
132
Reaction score
3
Location
UK
MidnightCity said:
apex fallacy.

the average woman "back then" didnt have it much worse than the average man.

you cant attribute the atrocities of the few ruling class men of bygone eras to the whole of men.

cut the self-hate out and go get yours
:rockon:

I completely overlooked that, very true. I wonder if the universal bashing of men in history by society is intentionally applied to all men of the past, rather than just the one's who were in power? Hmm . . . food for thought.

Although still, there are times in the past (e.g witch hunts in Europe) where you were better off being male rather than female, in some parts of the world anyway.
 

user name

Banned
Joined
Sep 24, 2013
Messages
342
Reaction score
16
cervantesscthree said:
:rockon:

I completely overlooked that, very true. I wonder if the universal bashing of men in history by society is intentionally applied to all men of the past, rather than just the one's who were in power? Hmm . . . food for thought.

Although still, there are times in the past (e.g witch hunts in Europe) where you were better off being male rather than female, in some parts of the world anyway.
/thread.
 

( . )( . )

Banned
Joined
Dec 31, 2002
Messages
4,873
Reaction score
177
Location
Cobra Kai dojo
MidnightCity said:
apex fallacy.

the average woman "back then" didnt have it much worse than the average man.

you cant attribute the atrocities of the few ruling class men of bygone eras to the whole of men.

cut the self-hate out and go get yours

Nailed it. Despite what TV/public schooling tells you, women never had it "worse" than men.

Sperm has always been cheap and eggs always expensive. There's never been a time in history where it's been different. Burning a few mentally unstable liabilities for the long term betterment of the tribe is hardly comparable to the millions of men used as cannon fodder to coal miners. It's not even in the same ballpark.
 

"Nervous Around Beautiful Women? There's a Rule for That"

I could talk to any woman I wasn't attracted to. Charming, funny, relaxed. Then a gorgeous woman looked my way and I'd become a sweating, babbling mess.

The fix took me years to find and ten minutes to learn. Nervousness and excitement are the same physical state — pounding heart, adrenaline, flushed face. Your brain just picks the label. And you can pick a better one.

Rule 16 shows you how. You feel the nerves, relabel them as excitement, and let that energy pour out as enthusiasm. Women notice the guy radiating it. They always do.

Read more...

Top