spesmilitis
Master Don Juan
- Joined
- Sep 3, 2006
- Messages
- 1,490
- Reaction score
- 6
“The 22 Rules That Flip the Script With Women… And How You Can Use Them Tonight”
Most guys accidentally kill attraction before they even speak. They assume they need a bigger bank account, a better physique, or smoother lines. They miss the point.
Female desire operates on a specific set of psychological triggers. Break them, and you're invisible. Follow them, and you become magnetic.
I learned this the hard way. Years of freezing up. Getting friend-zoned. Watching other guys walk away with the girl I wanted. Then I discovered a set of 22 simple rules that rewired my entire approach.
good info about sugars (lactose, fructoce, malto and reguar dex)
- Thread starter spesmilitis
- Start date
What happens, IN HER MIND, is that she comes to see you as WORTHLESS simply because she hasn't had to INVEST anything in you in order to get you or to keep you.
You were an interesting diversion while she had nothing else to do. But now that someone a little more valuable has come along, someone who expects her to treat him very well, she'll have no problem at all dropping you or demoting you to lowly "friendship" status.
Quote taken from The SoSuave Guide to Women and Dating, which you can read for FREE.
reyalp
Master Don Juan
You could have just posted one thread containing all of the links, you know
see "signal to noise ratio" for clarification
see "signal to noise ratio" for clarification
Skilla_Staz
Master Don Juan
player backwards guy, what are you talking about? He just posted a link to a thread about sugars. What other links should he put in one thread?
The other link he posted in another thread, is a completely different subject.
The other link he posted in another thread, is a completely different subject.
reyalp
Master Don Juan
well in case you hadn't noticed, the OP just made a significant number of threads where he simply mentions a topic in the subject line and then posts links to wannabebig.com articles
that's what i'm referencing in my original response to the OP. all of his posts could have just as easily been consolidated into one thread for posting, improving readability and the signal to noise ratio.
that's what i'm referencing in my original response to the OP. all of his posts could have just as easily been consolidated into one thread for posting, improving readability and the signal to noise ratio.
Skilla_Staz
Master Don Juan
I agree with Throttle. Seperating these links into differnet threads leaves room for people to reply to that specific link. While his "signal:noise ratio" may be one that you don't feel is necessary, people reading these links, and responding to them may appreciate them. It prevents a lot of confusion.