"You'll Never Feel READY to Walk Over"

Next Monday you'll feel more confident. After the gym you'll feel more confident. After one more drink you'll feel more confident. After you get a better haircut, a better jacket, a better job.

You've been "getting ready" for two years.

She's standing ten feet away right now. She'll be gone in four minutes. No amount of preparation will manufacture the courage that only comes from moving your feet.

Walk over. Stumble through the first sentence. Let it be clumsy. Let it be imperfect. You will feel more alive in those ten seconds than you have all month.

Read more...

good info about sugars (lactose, fructoce, malto and reguar dex)

"Stop Asking Your Friends What to Text Her"

Your buddy Dave has been single for three years and thinks "hey u up" is a valid strategy. Your other buddy Mike just got dumped and told you to "just be yourself."

You showed them her text. You asked them to decode the emoji. You drafted four responses and sent the screenshot to the group chat for a vote.

She's been waiting forty minutes.

Put the phone down. Stop crowdsourcing your love life. Type something that sounds like you. Hit send. Then go do literally anything else with your evening.

Read more...

reyalp

Master Don Juan
Joined
Jan 14, 2006
Messages
598
Reaction score
1
Location
southern usa
You could have just posted one thread containing all of the links, you know

see "signal to noise ratio" for clarification
 

Skilla_Staz

Master Don Juan
Joined
May 2, 2006
Messages
2,214
Reaction score
10
Age
37
Location
Omaha, Nebraska
player backwards guy, what are you talking about? He just posted a link to a thread about sugars. What other links should he put in one thread?

The other link he posted in another thread, is a completely different subject.
 

reyalp

Master Don Juan
Joined
Jan 14, 2006
Messages
598
Reaction score
1
Location
southern usa
well in case you hadn't noticed, the OP just made a significant number of threads where he simply mentions a topic in the subject line and then posts links to wannabebig.com articles

that's what i'm referencing in my original response to the OP. all of his posts could have just as easily been consolidated into one thread for posting, improving readability and the signal to noise ratio.
 

Throttle

Master Don Juan
Joined
Sep 7, 2006
Messages
1,787
Reaction score
11
not necessarily, if each of them had spawned a separate discussion.

i don't think you can fault his enthusiasm either, most of the linked articles are quite good, and i learned from several of them
 

"Stop Asking Your Friends What to Text Her"

Your buddy Dave has been single for three years and thinks "hey u up" is a valid strategy. Your other buddy Mike just got dumped and told you to "just be yourself."

You showed them her text. You asked them to decode the emoji. You drafted four responses and sent the screenshot to the group chat for a vote.

She's been waiting forty minutes.

Put the phone down. Stop crowdsourcing your love life. Type something that sounds like you. Hit send. Then go do literally anything else with your evening.

Read more...

Skilla_Staz

Master Don Juan
Joined
May 2, 2006
Messages
2,214
Reaction score
10
Age
37
Location
Omaha, Nebraska
I agree with Throttle. Seperating these links into differnet threads leaves room for people to reply to that specific link. While his "signal:noise ratio" may be one that you don't feel is necessary, people reading these links, and responding to them may appreciate them. It prevents a lot of confusion.
 
Top