"How I Made Sure No Woman Ever Friend-Zoned Me Again"
She calls you when her car breaks down. When she needs help moving. When some guy she's actually dating treats her badly.
You're the listener. The reliable one. The guy who would treat her so much better, if she'd just open her eyes.
She won't. You trained her to see you as the low-effort option — the friend who requires zero risk and zero investment. Every favor dug the hole deeper.
The "22 Rules" break the pattern. You'll stop auditioning for a role she already cast and become the man she chases instead. It starts with Rule 1.
"Gloria Steinem: How the CIA Used Feminism to Destabilize Society"
- Thread starter Plinco
- Start date
"I just moved here from Florida."
That sentence contains at least five follow-up questions she WANTS you to ask. Where in Florida? What brought you here? How long have you been in the area? What do you miss? How does it compare to here?
She handed them to you on a silver platter. And you said, "Oh cool. I come here every week. I love this band. Ummm... pretty crowded tonight."
She smiled politely. Nodded. And never texted you back.
I was that guy for years. Talking too much. Listening too little. Panicking about my next sentence while she was literally feeding me the answers.
Then I found 22 rules that fixed the whole thing. Rule number one: shut up and listen. She'll tell you exactly what to say.
It's pretty much common knowledge that feminism (and the homosexual agenda) was funded by the Rockefeller foundation as a means for population control.
you should check this out
Alex Jones interviews Aaron Russo Talks about the new world order and feminism among other things. Aaron Russo was a friend of one of the Rockefellers and reveals their plan which was revealed to him by them. Great stuff.
you should check this out
Alex Jones interviews Aaron Russo Talks about the new world order and feminism among other things. Aaron Russo was a friend of one of the Rockefellers and reveals their plan which was revealed to him by them. Great stuff.
oh great, the ignoramus have found their way onto this site :nono:Kal0051 said:
The creation and funding of the feminist movement by the Rockefellers is well documented. Not a conspiracy and definitely not a theory.
please do some research before you post your ignorant and un-educated drivel in this forum. This is a forum to educate not spread ignorance. Thank you.
I was mainly talking about the OP's post. Though I will admit that Nick Rockefeller was probably a little crazy (ie, the population reduction and microchipped society master plan). So yeah, I do know what your talking about but I wasn't talking about you, and btw don't accuse people of being ignorant.f283000 said:
"Why Women Dump the Guys Who Try the Hardest"
You paid for dinner. You drove. You said "whatever you want is fine" every single time. All the effort, no expectations.
And she left anyway — probably for a guy who makes her pick up the pizza.
Painful. Also predictable. Her mind quietly concludes that anything requiring zero effort from her is worth exactly zero. You became a free sample, and free samples get taken for granted.
The 22 Rules flip the dynamic. Small shifts that get her investing effort, money, and time in you — until SHE'S the one afraid of losing YOU.
Dust 2 Dust
Master Don Juan
Sexual Liberation Is Illuminati Subversion
By Henry Makow PhD
Throughout modern history Illuminati bankers have used sexual "liberation" to subvert society and establish their subtle tyranny.
The Illuminati bankers need to introduce "world government" in order to translate their unjust monopoly over credit into total world control. (http://www.savethemales.ca/000808.html )
They realized that they couldn't take control until they destroyed the family. This was a central plank of the Communist Manifesto in 1848.
Every major "revolution" in modern history has increased Illuminati banker control and the sexual revolution is no exception.
The bankers encouraged sexual dissipation using their various "progressive" fronts: liberalism, feminism, socialism and communism. The great appeal of left wing movements has always been the promise of "free" sex (i.e. free of the restraints of love & marriage.)
How is free sex subversive?
A healthy society is concerned with its survival and the propagation of its values. This requires that new generations are born and raised in a healthy manner, i.e. in a nuclear family. In a healthy society, women are honored for nurturing and educating the young, a role for which they are naturally suited.
Thus, the bankers set out to undermine and disparage women's role as wives and mothers.
They extolled "sexual liberation" because promiscuous women are less dedicated to family, and less attractive and suitable as wives and mothers. Furthermore, if sex is freely available, men have much less incentive to marry or be faithful.
Women were brainwashed to think they were being "exploited" by their family and should seek fulfillment in career and independence instead.
The bankers used paid subversives like Betty Frieden (http://www.savethemales.ca/000185.html) and Gloria Steinem (http://www.savethemales.ca/180302.html ) and the mass media to make it seem that Feminism was a spontaneous occurrence.
At the same time, they severed sex from marriage and procreation and exalted romance as the main source of fulfillment. Hollywood practically has angels singing hosannas when the stars have sex. It created this bogus religion.
THE TRUTH ABOUT SEX
Sex is a natural function like eating food. If we didn't have food, we would think about nothing else.
Because of the gender confusion (caused by Fe-manism) many people are sex starved and obsessed. Society suffers from arrested development manifested as an adolescent preoccupation with bodily functions, genitals, pornography and homosexuality.
If we have plenty, we know that, divorced from love, "sex is the biggest nothing in the world." (Andy Warhol)
Similarly, romantic love is mostly infatuation based on the expectation of some great advantage (usually sex and security.) I have seen businessmen generate the same kind of heat when making a lucrative deal. But, like AOL-Time Warner, romantic mergers often go sour.
A marriage based on sexual attraction is like a chair with one leg. True love is based on character, personality and trust, tested over a long period of time.
YOUNG WOMEN
The inflated status of fertile young women is another characteristic of our Illuminati-induced dysfunction. These women remind me of poker players recklessly overplaying their hand. They have lost the capacity to love, and sex is a paltry substitute.
Their dependence on sex appeal is very tenuous. The shelf life is short and competition is fierce. Jaded males can look at 1000's of practically identical naked women on the Net these days without being turned on. Increasingly they need drugs to respond and I suspect /disgust/ with women is the unconscious reason. Viagra and Cialis sales are in the billions.
Does it make sense for men to use these drugs?
Socrates said that when he no longer had a sex drive in old age, he was "released from the jaws of a wild beast." Why would a man take a drug to be captive once again?
Hormones generated by the testes cause the male sex drive that takes control of the mind. Just how powerful are these hormones?
Consider: Most young men would agree that their sisters are barely tolerable. However, /other/ men's sisters are a source of endless wonder and fascination. What's the difference? Sex of course.
Do harmless drugs exist that could suppress the production of these mind-altering sex hormones? Perhaps they could be made available to young men.
Then women, deprived of their magical spell, could be seen clearly and men could concentrate on something else. When a man falls in love based on a girl's character, he could go off the drug.
Of course, a better solution is for people to marry (or establish a long-term loving relationship) at a much younger age (i.e. 18-21) like they used to.
People decry marriage because sex declines in importance over time. I thought that was the purpose of marriage.
Sex belongs to an age-and-stage, i.e. courting and procreation. We weren't meant to be obsessed with it for our whole lives. There are much more important and interesting things to do.
CONCLUSION
Modern women are the victim of a monstrous hoax perpetrated by Illuminati bankers and their lackeys in media, government and education.
Women have been defrauded of a secure and essential social role, that of wife and mother. In exchange they have accepted the shaky role of sex objects and worker drones.
They tart it up with terms like "freedom" and "independence" but many are lonely, bitter and increasingly desperate. They have been cruelly duped by an evil power and we all suffer as a consequence.
Sex is used by the Illuminati as a 'reductum ad absurdum'. Everything good in life, culture, love, caring, justice, beauty, art, politics and intelligence; is flattened by what has become a sick societal obsession.
The Illuminati use sex to corrupt and debase. The pornography that floods our in-boxes is part of a widespread campaign to degrade us. A morally degraded people are a weak people, and a weak people are easily disinherited.
-----------------------------------
A detailed history of this subject can be found in E. Michael Jones' book "Libido Dominandi" Sexual Liberation and Political Control." http://www.culturewars.com/books.htm
See also my "Managing the Male Sex Drive" http://www.savethemales.ca/000535.html
And "Love is based on Mutual Dependence" http://www.savethemales.ca/000789.html
By Henry Makow PhD
Throughout modern history Illuminati bankers have used sexual "liberation" to subvert society and establish their subtle tyranny.
The Illuminati bankers need to introduce "world government" in order to translate their unjust monopoly over credit into total world control. (http://www.savethemales.ca/000808.html )
They realized that they couldn't take control until they destroyed the family. This was a central plank of the Communist Manifesto in 1848.
Every major "revolution" in modern history has increased Illuminati banker control and the sexual revolution is no exception.
The bankers encouraged sexual dissipation using their various "progressive" fronts: liberalism, feminism, socialism and communism. The great appeal of left wing movements has always been the promise of "free" sex (i.e. free of the restraints of love & marriage.)
How is free sex subversive?
A healthy society is concerned with its survival and the propagation of its values. This requires that new generations are born and raised in a healthy manner, i.e. in a nuclear family. In a healthy society, women are honored for nurturing and educating the young, a role for which they are naturally suited.
Thus, the bankers set out to undermine and disparage women's role as wives and mothers.
They extolled "sexual liberation" because promiscuous women are less dedicated to family, and less attractive and suitable as wives and mothers. Furthermore, if sex is freely available, men have much less incentive to marry or be faithful.
Women were brainwashed to think they were being "exploited" by their family and should seek fulfillment in career and independence instead.
The bankers used paid subversives like Betty Frieden (http://www.savethemales.ca/000185.html) and Gloria Steinem (http://www.savethemales.ca/180302.html ) and the mass media to make it seem that Feminism was a spontaneous occurrence.
At the same time, they severed sex from marriage and procreation and exalted romance as the main source of fulfillment. Hollywood practically has angels singing hosannas when the stars have sex. It created this bogus religion.
THE TRUTH ABOUT SEX
Sex is a natural function like eating food. If we didn't have food, we would think about nothing else.
Because of the gender confusion (caused by Fe-manism) many people are sex starved and obsessed. Society suffers from arrested development manifested as an adolescent preoccupation with bodily functions, genitals, pornography and homosexuality.
If we have plenty, we know that, divorced from love, "sex is the biggest nothing in the world." (Andy Warhol)
Similarly, romantic love is mostly infatuation based on the expectation of some great advantage (usually sex and security.) I have seen businessmen generate the same kind of heat when making a lucrative deal. But, like AOL-Time Warner, romantic mergers often go sour.
A marriage based on sexual attraction is like a chair with one leg. True love is based on character, personality and trust, tested over a long period of time.
YOUNG WOMEN
The inflated status of fertile young women is another characteristic of our Illuminati-induced dysfunction. These women remind me of poker players recklessly overplaying their hand. They have lost the capacity to love, and sex is a paltry substitute.
Their dependence on sex appeal is very tenuous. The shelf life is short and competition is fierce. Jaded males can look at 1000's of practically identical naked women on the Net these days without being turned on. Increasingly they need drugs to respond and I suspect /disgust/ with women is the unconscious reason. Viagra and Cialis sales are in the billions.
Does it make sense for men to use these drugs?
Socrates said that when he no longer had a sex drive in old age, he was "released from the jaws of a wild beast." Why would a man take a drug to be captive once again?
Hormones generated by the testes cause the male sex drive that takes control of the mind. Just how powerful are these hormones?
Consider: Most young men would agree that their sisters are barely tolerable. However, /other/ men's sisters are a source of endless wonder and fascination. What's the difference? Sex of course.
Do harmless drugs exist that could suppress the production of these mind-altering sex hormones? Perhaps they could be made available to young men.
Then women, deprived of their magical spell, could be seen clearly and men could concentrate on something else. When a man falls in love based on a girl's character, he could go off the drug.
Of course, a better solution is for people to marry (or establish a long-term loving relationship) at a much younger age (i.e. 18-21) like they used to.
People decry marriage because sex declines in importance over time. I thought that was the purpose of marriage.
Sex belongs to an age-and-stage, i.e. courting and procreation. We weren't meant to be obsessed with it for our whole lives. There are much more important and interesting things to do.
CONCLUSION
Modern women are the victim of a monstrous hoax perpetrated by Illuminati bankers and their lackeys in media, government and education.
Women have been defrauded of a secure and essential social role, that of wife and mother. In exchange they have accepted the shaky role of sex objects and worker drones.
They tart it up with terms like "freedom" and "independence" but many are lonely, bitter and increasingly desperate. They have been cruelly duped by an evil power and we all suffer as a consequence.
Sex is used by the Illuminati as a 'reductum ad absurdum'. Everything good in life, culture, love, caring, justice, beauty, art, politics and intelligence; is flattened by what has become a sick societal obsession.
The Illuminati use sex to corrupt and debase. The pornography that floods our in-boxes is part of a widespread campaign to degrade us. A morally degraded people are a weak people, and a weak people are easily disinherited.
-----------------------------------
A detailed history of this subject can be found in E. Michael Jones' book "Libido Dominandi" Sexual Liberation and Political Control." http://www.culturewars.com/books.htm
See also my "Managing the Male Sex Drive" http://www.savethemales.ca/000535.html
And "Love is based on Mutual Dependence" http://www.savethemales.ca/000789.html
fertileTurtle
Master Don Juan
Yeah. It's more like stupid socialism creates idiots. Public Schools=Socialist Pvssy Mens
Dust 2 Dust
Master Don Juan
We are being re-engineered to serve the Illuminati. They undermine institutions like marriage, and promote depravity, dysfunction, corruption and division.
Feminism, our official gender ideology, masquerades as a movement for women's rights. In reality, feminism is a cruel hoax, telling women their natural biological instincts are "socially constructed" to oppress them.
Feminism is elite social engineering designed to destroy gender identity, making women masculine and men feminine. Increasingly heterosexuals are being conditioned to behave like homosexuals who generally don't marry and have children. Thus courtship and monogamy are being replaced by sexual promiscuity, prophesied in Aldous Huxley's Brave New World.
The Rockefellers and Rothschilds created feminism to weaken the family and poison male-female relations (divide and conquer.) Their twin objectives are depopulation and totalitarian world government. Why? These bankers create money out of nothing and think they are God.
Feminism, our official gender ideology, masquerades as a movement for women's rights. In reality, feminism is a cruel hoax, telling women their natural biological instincts are "socially constructed" to oppress them.
Feminism is elite social engineering designed to destroy gender identity, making women masculine and men feminine. Increasingly heterosexuals are being conditioned to behave like homosexuals who generally don't marry and have children. Thus courtship and monogamy are being replaced by sexual promiscuity, prophesied in Aldous Huxley's Brave New World.
The Rockefellers and Rothschilds created feminism to weaken the family and poison male-female relations (divide and conquer.) Their twin objectives are depopulation and totalitarian world government. Why? These bankers create money out of nothing and think they are God.
U
user43770
Guest
Dust 2 Dust said:
How does the destruction of the nuclear family empower the elite? How is a nuclear family more apt to stop this takeover than a bunch of single people who like to fvck?
"I'm Not Looking for Anything Serious Right Now"
When a woman says it, guys hear a confession. A heads-up. A scheduling conflict.
Here's the translation: I don't feel anything. Right now. With you.
Watch what happens when a man triggers actual attraction. The busy career, the recent breakup, the "not in a place to date" — all of it evaporates instantly. The same woman who was guarding her freedom is suddenly free every night.
The "22 Rules" explain why. When the right switches flip, her timeline rearranges itself around you.
U
user43770
Guest
C-quenced said:
If there were actual evidence, they wouldn't be called conspiracy theories.
Nuclear families tend to be stronger. A strong family is hard to destabilize and coerce to do your bidding. In this case, shop, shop, shop and WORK!!TyTe`EyEz said:
With more women having money and entering the workforce, the economy has been booming. Now you can call this a conspiracy, but I see it as business.
This is not a result of the Illuminati or the Rockefellers. It's the cause of business. Capitalism.
Women having money means women buy more sh*t. Weak men buy more sh*t. Everybody buys more sh*t. Business makes more money, government makes more taxes. Why do you think women have so much support from business and government?? It makes MONEY.
U
user43770
Guest
Alle_Gory said:
Very well stated. I understand capitalism; I don't, however, understand this "Illuminati" business.
"The Coffee Shop Girl You Never Spoke To"
You've replayed it a hundred times. She stood three feet away, scrolling her phone. You had an opening. You composed the perfect line — after she was gone.
For all you know, she's married now. To some guy who said something. Anything.
Openers are cheap. Almost any sentence works when it's delivered within three seconds. The expensive part is the standing there, drafting and deleting, while the window quietly closes.
The "22 Rules" stripped out my hesitation. What to open with, how to keep it alive, and the one habit that costs guys more women than anything else: waiting for perfect.
While alot of this may sound silly and crazy, it's not.
There has been research done and I will try and find some of the sources.
However, so much is behind the scenes and 'covert' that it's hard to get the shining piece of evidence. No doubt it's there though. You can see the results of it in the world. In fact it's almost uncanny.
There has been research done and I will try and find some of the sources.
However, so much is behind the scenes and 'covert' that it's hard to get the shining piece of evidence. No doubt it's there though. You can see the results of it in the world. In fact it's almost uncanny.
Here's the way these conspiracy theories seem to gain traction;
A statement of some observed condition is made (e.g.,
"Women have been defrauded of a secure and essential social role, that of wife and mother. In exchange they have accepted the shaky role of sex objects and worker drones.
They tart it up with terms like "freedom" and "independence" but many are lonely, bitter and increasingly desperate. They have been cruelly duped by an evil power and we all suffer as a consequence."
Then the conspiracy theorist explains it as being due to the "Illumati", Rockefellers and Rothchilds, "International Bankers" - long a code word for Jews - or whatever.
Since the condition is observable fact (sort of), all the conspiracy theorist has to do is to say that the (fill-in-the-blank) obviously had to have caused it, because, look, see? The result is there. Voila - "Modern women are the victim of a monstrous hoax perpetrated by Illuminati bankers and their lackeys in media, government and education."
It's Bulls--t, circular logic. We need more critical thinking, not blind belief in "theories."
A statement of some observed condition is made (e.g.,
"Women have been defrauded of a secure and essential social role, that of wife and mother. In exchange they have accepted the shaky role of sex objects and worker drones.
They tart it up with terms like "freedom" and "independence" but many are lonely, bitter and increasingly desperate. They have been cruelly duped by an evil power and we all suffer as a consequence."
Then the conspiracy theorist explains it as being due to the "Illumati", Rockefellers and Rothchilds, "International Bankers" - long a code word for Jews - or whatever.
Since the condition is observable fact (sort of), all the conspiracy theorist has to do is to say that the (fill-in-the-blank) obviously had to have caused it, because, look, see? The result is there. Voila - "Modern women are the victim of a monstrous hoax perpetrated by Illuminati bankers and their lackeys in media, government and education."
It's Bulls--t, circular logic. We need more critical thinking, not blind belief in "theories."
The irony is that people have been conditioned to believe that conspiracy theories are just myths. If they're not reported in the media then they must be myths.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3sGs...3A04CADD&playnext=1&playnext_from=PL&index=62
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3sGs...3A04CADD&playnext=1&playnext_from=PL&index=62
Whatever they Have done, I forgive.
Psalm 37:1-3
Fret not thyself because of evildoers, neither be thou envious against the workers of iniquity.
For they shall soon be cut down like the grass, and wither as the green herb.
Trust in the LORD, and do good; so shalt thou dwell in the land, and verily thou shalt be fed.
Psalm 37:1-3
Fret not thyself because of evildoers, neither be thou envious against the workers of iniquity.
For they shall soon be cut down like the grass, and wither as the green herb.
Trust in the LORD, and do good; so shalt thou dwell in the land, and verily thou shalt be fed.