You asked her if she wanted to grab coffee. Then you asked if the time worked. Then you asked if the place was okay. Then you asked if she'd prefer tea.
Four questions. Four chances for her to say no. Four signals that you're terrified of making a decision.
Plan it. Pick the place. Pick the time. Tell her where to meet you. She'll either show up or she won't.
Either way, you look like a man instead of a scared little boy.
You made your case like a lawyer. Stable job. Good guy. Ready for something real. All true. All irrelevant.
She weighed your points, nodded along, felt nothing — then fell hard for some tattooed bartender with a motorcycle and a gambling problem.
Logic is where attraction goes to die. The "22 Rules" work a level deeper, on the subconscious switches that decide within minutes whether you register as a MAN or as part of the furniture.
Stop presenting evidence. Start flipping switches.
Your buddy Dave has been single for three years and thinks "hey u up" is a valid strategy. Your other buddy Mike just got dumped and told you to "just be yourself."
You showed them her text. You asked them to decode the emoji. You drafted four responses and sent the screenshot to the group chat for a vote.
She's been waiting forty minutes.
Put the phone down. Stop crowdsourcing your love life. Type something that sounds like you. Hit send. Then go do literally anything else with your evening.
lol. this thread is getting better by the minute!Mr.Positive said:Great post Penkitten. I think you also answered the 'fat women' thread too.
http://www.sosuave.net/forum/showthread.php?t=137282
More feminine males = more women lacking love = more women eating chocolate to supplicate = more fat women.
Seems pretty simple to me.![]()
i just copied and pasted what that site showed as research. hasn't anyone here ever heard of this before?Mr.Positive said:Great post Penkitten. I think you also answered the 'fat women' thread too.
http://www.sosuave.net/forum/showthread.php?t=137282
More feminine males = more women lacking love = more women eating chocolate to supplicate = more fat women.
Seems pretty simple to me.![]()
but you see it is true, with all the programs out there to feed the poor, the poor girls eat. the rich girls are not eating because they dont want to. you and i are both right on that one. poor chicks do not turn down a good meal, or a free meal, because they need it.aliasguy said:"rich girls become anorexic to get attention and look good, but poor girls never end up with this "disease". why not? because poor girls never turn down a good meal, who knows when they will eat again!"
PK, you know I love your stuff, and I agree with you most all the time, but THIS is just NOT TRUE.
Do you know, or have you EVER met anyone in the last 10 years who is going hungry except by CHOICE? There is NO need for any woman, man, or child to be hungry in this country. We have FIXED hunger in America. Poverty DOES exist (and the definition is sketchy), but there is NO reason for a woman not to be able to eat. Or her kids. Too many programs, etc. Cop-out.
I could talk to any woman I wasn't attracted to. Charming, funny, relaxed. Then a gorgeous woman looked my way and I'd become a sweating, babbling mess.
The fix took me years to find and ten minutes to learn. Nervousness and excitement are the same physical state — pounding heart, adrenaline, flushed face. Your brain just picks the label. And you can pick a better one.
Rule 16 shows you how. You feel the nerves, relabel them as excitement, and let that energy pour out as enthusiasm. Women notice the guy radiating it. They always do.
They DO NOT need it --- they are FAT. They've NEVER gone hungry. Ever. Their whole lives. Most of them carry cell phones, too.penkitten said:but you see it is true, with all the programs out there to feed the poor, the poor girls eat. the rich girls are not eating because they dont want to. you and i are both right on that one. poor chicks do not turn down a good meal, or a free meal, because they need it.
Eating well is EASY. Good, quality food is cheap and plentiful (for now.)joekerr31 said:rich girls dont eat because of the social pressure to be thin.
there is a LOT of social pressure to conform among the rich. many of them live a status-driven life.
often times with the rich its just one of the couple who makes all the money. often the male. and while the male may not be overly status driven (as hes busy working) the female has a ton of free time on her hands (as do all her friends). and to give their life purpose they engage in a wide variety of status-driven behaviors, which are engrained in their kids.
poor girls who are fat generally are fat due to poor food. while the rich are eating sirloin steak, poor people are eating KFC and twinkies because that's what is in their neighbourhoods.
even when it comes to 'good' food they eat high cal food like potatoes.
I ran across some highly similar ideas the other day here:But after years of working with countless men, I am convinced that a unique combination of social dynamics over the last five decades has produced a plethora of Nice Guys in historically unprecedented numbers.
To truly understand the current phenomena of the Nice Guy Syndrome, we have to take into account a series of significant social changes that began around the turn of the century and accelerated following World War II. These social dynamics included:
l
The transition from an agrarian to an industrial economy.
l
The movement of families from rural areas to urban areas.
l
The absence of fathers from the home.
l
The increase in divorce, single parent homes, and homes headed by women.
l
An educational system dominated by women.
l
Women's liberation and feminism.
l
The Vietnam War.
l
The sexual revolution.
You asked her if she wanted to grab coffee. Then you asked if the time worked. Then you asked if the place was okay. Then you asked if she'd prefer tea.
Four questions. Four chances for her to say no. Four signals that you're terrified of making a decision.
Plan it. Pick the place. Pick the time. Tell her where to meet you. She'll either show up or she won't.
Either way, you look like a man instead of a scared little boy.
I actually considered buying Hershey stock after reading this.Mr.Positive said:More feminine males = more women lacking love = more women eating chocolate to supplicate = more fat women.
Seems pretty simple to me.![]()
oh that was golden.KarmaSutra said:Chocolate=femininity? Um,no. Men acting/looking like chicks to get chicks=femininity? Yes.
apparently men have always known that women can't get enough of chocolate, but the saying came long before any research studies.Z Man said:So, perhaps this is where the misleading notion to give a girl flowers and chocolate candy in order to win her over, came from?
You paid for dinner. You drove. You said "whatever you want is fine" every single time. All the effort, no expectations.
And she left anyway — probably for a guy who makes her pick up the pizza.
Painful. Also predictable. Her mind quietly concludes that anything requiring zero effort from her is worth exactly zero. You became a free sample, and free samples get taken for granted.
The 22 Rules flip the dynamic. Small shifts that get her investing effort, money, and time in you — until SHE'S the one afraid of losing YOU.