Ok,
So, some people say appearance doesnt matter and some say its all about how well you play your game.
I was thinking about this and I noticed that theres a difference between an ugly guy who really has no hope VS the other type of ugly guy who may be just fat and hairy.. but if you look beyond skin deep, this other "ugly guy" seriously has a lot of potential just by looking at his facial structure.
Lets compare the two
ugly guy #1
http://n00108.myspace.com/00108/63/23/108963236_l.jpg
VS
fat ugly guy #2
http://www.bodybuilding.com/fun/louis.htm
Guy #2 has more of that "masculine" facial structure but it was covered with fat vs #1 who doesn't look as masculine. His face doesn't look as.. "strong".
Look at vin diesel, he is not "good looking".. but looks good cause masculinity is written all over is face. Or I guess you can say his face is symetrical. What you think?
(by the way, disregard all of their celebrity status)
Guy #2 may not be as good looking as brad pitt (who is considered "good looking guy") but #2 definitely looks like a "masculine man". Refer to Vin Diesel for example.
So, in my opinion there are 2 types of ugly guys.
#1 Fat and ugly who doesnt have a symetrical face . Even if he lost the weight and gained muscles, his face is not "masculine" which I think the chicks are after
#2 Fat and ugly guy who has a masculine facial structure.. meaning a symetrical face. He may not have the body yet.. But, just loose the fat and pump some iron and this guy can be a "bad boy". This guy has a
very good potential to get more chicks
than the pretty boy.
#3 Then theres the pretty boy. He just looks good
Ok guys, share your opinions.
Also include if you;re a #1 or a #2 or #3 or whatever
So, some people say appearance doesnt matter and some say its all about how well you play your game.
I was thinking about this and I noticed that theres a difference between an ugly guy who really has no hope VS the other type of ugly guy who may be just fat and hairy.. but if you look beyond skin deep, this other "ugly guy" seriously has a lot of potential just by looking at his facial structure.
Lets compare the two
ugly guy #1
http://n00108.myspace.com/00108/63/23/108963236_l.jpg
VS
fat ugly guy #2
http://www.bodybuilding.com/fun/louis.htm
Guy #2 has more of that "masculine" facial structure but it was covered with fat vs #1 who doesn't look as masculine. His face doesn't look as.. "strong".
Look at vin diesel, he is not "good looking".. but looks good cause masculinity is written all over is face. Or I guess you can say his face is symetrical. What you think?
(by the way, disregard all of their celebrity status)
Guy #2 may not be as good looking as brad pitt (who is considered "good looking guy") but #2 definitely looks like a "masculine man". Refer to Vin Diesel for example.
So, in my opinion there are 2 types of ugly guys.
#1 Fat and ugly who doesnt have a symetrical face . Even if he lost the weight and gained muscles, his face is not "masculine" which I think the chicks are after
#2 Fat and ugly guy who has a masculine facial structure.. meaning a symetrical face. He may not have the body yet.. But, just loose the fat and pump some iron and this guy can be a "bad boy". This guy has a
very good potential to get more chicks
than the pretty boy.
#3 Then theres the pretty boy. He just looks good
Ok guys, share your opinions.
Also include if you;re a #1 or a #2 or #3 or whatever