Exchanging Financial Support for Hot Sex

[member160292]

Men pay for sex one way or another, whether it’s with their time or resources. I’d be curious if any of you that are financially stable with disposable income to keep a plate around for just that purpose. Not as far as say a sugar daddy, but taking care of stuff she enjoys DOING, not materialistic. For example, getaways, dancing classes, sport activities, etc.

 

[corrector]

You doing these things with her?

 

[EyeBRollin]

Can you clarify the question?

If not sugar daddy what is the term? Benefactor?

 

[BackInTheGame78]

Fvck no.

By your rationalization, women pay far MORE for sex when you factor in the cost of getting and maintaining hair, makeup, nails and other things like getting waxed, eyebrows done, etc.

Probably by 3-4x what you are claiming men are "paying for anyways" on sex.

You know how much it costs to cut, highlight and/or color hair these days for women??

$200 at minimum. When's the last time you had a $200 haircut? Most guys probably don't even spend that in a year.

 

[Billtx49]

Can you clarify the question?

If not sugar daddy what is the term? Benefactor?

There is no descriptive term they use, she doesn’t think she’s an escort or hooker, and he doesn’t think he’s wasting money by playing sugar daddy…
Mutual self delusions, she gives him all the sex he can handle and likes but doesn’t love him, and he thinks she’s in love when she says the L word, plus he feels generous and helpful by his gift giving…

 

[BackInTheGame78]

There is no descriptive term, she doesn’t think she’s an escort or hooker, and he doesn’t think he’s wasting money by playing sugar daddy…
Mutual self delusions, she likes but doesn’t love him, and he feels generous through his gifts.

They already have terms for that.

The woman is a prostitute and the man is a fool.

 

[lgbs2004]

Every woman is a hooker, you pay one way or another!

 

[Billtx49]

They already have terms for that.

The woman is a prostitute and the man is a fool.

To others, yes. I was describing their individual thought precesses which explains why it keeps happening…

 

[lgbs2004]

the man is a fool.

Why?

 

[BackInTheGame78]

Why?

If you have to ask that question, I feel sorry for you.

 

[lgbs2004]

If you have to ask that question, I feel sorry for you.

If the guy has money and doesn't want to waste time courting women, he can just pay the wh0re to leave when he's done.

I'm not saying I would do it if I had money to spare, but I don't see it as being a fool!

 

[Bokanovsky]

Fvck no.

By your rationalization, women pay far MORE for sex when you factor in the cost of getting and maintaining hair, makeup, nails and other things like getting waxed, eyebrows done, etc.

Probably by 3-4x what you are claiming men are "paying for anyways" on sex.

You know how much it costs to cut, highlight and/or color hair these days for women??

$200 at minimum. When's the last time you had a $200 haircut? Most guys probably don't even spend that in a year.

This sounds like something a woman would write. And for your sake, I hope that you are, in fact, a woman (otherwise, what you wrote would imply an extreme level of inexperience and naïveté).

The fact of the matter is that women don’t do any of that stuff for YOUR benefit. Hell no. They do it for attention and validation they get from men (all men) AND even more importantly, other women. A woman’s worst nightmare is being perceived as having poor style and to be looked at negatively by other females. They are extremely competitive in that regard. And they all gossip about other women’s style behind their backs.

Bottom line is that women spend all that money on clothing and haircuts for the benefit of their social status and self esteem, not for the benefit of your erection.

 

[member160292]

You doing these things with her?

Absolutely not.

Fvck no.

By your rationalization, women pay far MORE for sex when you factor in the cost of getting and maintaining hair, makeup, nails and other things like getting waxed, eyebrows done, etc.

Probably by 3-4x what you are claiming men are "paying for anyways" on sex.

You know how much it costs to cut, highlight and/or color hair these days for women??

$200 at minimum. When's the last time you had a $200 haircut? Most guys probably don't even spend that in a year.

My resources to take care of her appearance wouldn’t be part of the agreement, nothing materialistic

If the guy has money and doesn't want to waste time courting women, he can just pay the wh0re to leave when he's done.

I'm not saying I would do it if I had money to spare, but I don't see it as being a fool!

My thought is if I have disposable income, why not keep a women knowing it’s NSA while pursuing higher quality women. It’d be more of a hot young piece of ass that you think of as a play date

 

[BackInTheGame78]

This sounds like something a woman would write. And for your sake, I hope that you are, in fact, a woman (otherwise, what you wrote would imply an extreme level of inexperience and naïveté).

The fact of the matter is that women don’t do any of that stuff for YOUR benefit. Hell no. They do it for attention and validation they get from men (all men) AND even more importantly, other women. A woman’s worst nightmare is being perceived as having poor style and to be looked at negatively by other females. They are extremely competitive in that regard. And they all gossip about other women’s style behind their backs.

Bottom line is that women spend all that money on clothing and haircuts for the benefit of their social status and self esteem, not for the benefit of your erection.

So you claim that you've never dated a woman who spent money specifically to look good for you that she wouldn't have spent otherwise?

That's laughable, unless you only date the dregs of society that are out begging on the street for money and have nothing to spend.

 

[corrector]

Absolutely not.

That sounds like an arrangement. You know like the seeking arrangments site. That is sugar daddy territory. You dont have to be rich or lavish to be a sugar daddy. In fact you could be a sugar daddy if you are poor too. Its the principle more than the dollar amount. Why would you distance yourself from labelling that illicit relationship as a sugar daddy? Its still beta buxx because you are not enough in and of yourself to keep her which means you are lacking and need to compensate by funding her.

 

[Murk]

I've paid for escorts in the past, however this is too far. I paid for the transactional act and enjoyment, I would never maintain some bimbo slag's high-maintenance lifestyle, too beta and self-degrading for me to stomach, regardless of my earnings.