Seems to be getting some public traction.
http://finance.yahoo.com/news/happens-end-fed-185459981.html
http://finance.yahoo.com/news/happens-end-fed-185459981.html
"She Liked You in March. It's October Now."
Attraction runs on a clock.
She flirted for weeks. Touched your arm. Found reasons to be alone with you. And you were careful. Respectful. Waiting for the right moment.
The moment had a shelf life. It expired around month two, and by the time you asked her out, she'd quietly filed you under "little brother."
One of the hardest lessons inside the 22 Rules: women rarely wait. Interest either grows or it decays, and nothing decays it faster than a man who never moves.
Make the move while she's still inventing reasons to be near you.
Ending the Federal Reserve
- Thread starter Burroughs
- Start date
"Nervous Around Beautiful Women? There's a Rule for That"
I could talk to any woman I wasn't attracted to. Charming, funny, relaxed. Then a gorgeous woman looked my way and I'd become a sweating, babbling mess.
The fix took me years to find and ten minutes to learn. Nervousness and excitement are the same physical state — pounding heart, adrenaline, flushed face. Your brain just picks the label. And you can pick a better one.
Rule 16 shows you how. You feel the nerves, relabel them as excitement, and let that energy pour out as enthusiasm. Women notice the guy radiating it. They always do.
Julius_Seizeher
Master Don Juan
I don't take most of the "End the Fed" movement seriously, yet, because while they see the problems of central banking (and thus central planning and socialism), they are not yet calling en masse for the only alternative to central banking/fiat money: a gold standard.
They do not draw the correlation. In the absence of a central bank, the dollar must be based on gold and silver. But generations of college professors and media shysters like Paul Krugman have told us that reality isn't real and thus gold isn't real (but their counterfeit paper is).
Are you beginning to see the correlation? The statists had to smear and destroy the concept of the gold standard in order to smuggle this country into an ineffective, stagnant, burdensome bureaucratic socialism state where central banks and fiat money serve their deficit spending and welfare statism goals. And look at what it has achieved, all that prattling about "the common good" and "evolved sensibilities".
It is only in reality, and in freedom, that man can exist and achieve a life worth living. The more we try to cheat reality in the name of "the common good", the common destruction is all we will achieve.
It is also to the benefit of the anti-Fed movement that the socialist welfare states of Europe are crumbling before our very eyes. You see, there is no dichotomy between the moral and the practical; the moral is the practical. It is moral for man to live in freedom, and practical for each man to bear the responsibilities that freedom entails.
We have always been told that this country escaped a century of barbarism when we came off the gold standard; we are now seeing that the statists (beginning with FDR) have used the wrong tense.
They do not draw the correlation. In the absence of a central bank, the dollar must be based on gold and silver. But generations of college professors and media shysters like Paul Krugman have told us that reality isn't real and thus gold isn't real (but their counterfeit paper is).
Are you beginning to see the correlation? The statists had to smear and destroy the concept of the gold standard in order to smuggle this country into an ineffective, stagnant, burdensome bureaucratic socialism state where central banks and fiat money serve their deficit spending and welfare statism goals. And look at what it has achieved, all that prattling about "the common good" and "evolved sensibilities".
It is only in reality, and in freedom, that man can exist and achieve a life worth living. The more we try to cheat reality in the name of "the common good", the common destruction is all we will achieve.
It is also to the benefit of the anti-Fed movement that the socialist welfare states of Europe are crumbling before our very eyes. You see, there is no dichotomy between the moral and the practical; the moral is the practical. It is moral for man to live in freedom, and practical for each man to bear the responsibilities that freedom entails.
We have always been told that this country escaped a century of barbarism when we came off the gold standard; we are now seeing that the statists (beginning with FDR) have used the wrong tense.
Well, Ron Paul was the one who basically started the whole "End the Fed" thing. He talks a lot about the role of gold when it comes to monetary policy. I wouldn't be surprised if more and more people start talking about it if the movement gets serious. But honestly, if you told me more people would soon be discussing this stuff soon back in 2007, I wouldn't have believed it at all. I'm glad there is at least some progress, even if it's a little...Julius_Seizeher said:I don't take most of the "End the Fed" movement seriously, yet, because while they see the problems of central banking (and thus central planning and socialism), they are not yet calling en masse for the only alternative to central banking/fiat money: a gold standard.
They do not draw the correlation. In the absence of a central bank, the dollar must be based on gold and silver. But generations of college professors and media shysters like Paul Krugman have told us that reality isn't real and thus gold isn't real (but their counterfeit paper is).
Are you beginning to see the correlation? The statists had to smear and destroy the concept of the gold standard in order to smuggle this country into an ineffective, stagnant, burdensome bureaucratic socialism state where central banks and fiat money serve their deficit spending and welfare statism goals. And look at what it has achieved, all that prattling about "the common good" and "evolved sensibilities".
It is only in reality, and in freedom, that man can exist and achieve a life worth living. The more we try to cheat reality in the name of "the common good", the common destruction is all we will achieve.
It is also to the benefit of the anti-Fed movement that the socialist welfare states of Europe are crumbling before our very eyes. You see, there is no dichotomy between the moral and the practical; the moral is the practical. It is moral for man to live in freedom, and practical for each man to bear the responsibilities that freedom entails.
We have always been told that this country escaped a century of barbarism when we came off the gold standard; we are now seeing that the statists (beginning with FDR) have used the wrong tense.
I feel the same way...that's why I posted it.Falcon said:, if you told me more people would soon be discussing this stuff soon back in 2007, I wouldn't have believed it at all. I'm glad there is at least some progress, even if it's a little...
I would never have believed a year ago that ending the FED would become a semi mainstream topic to the point where CNN And yahoo cover it openly.
Of course we have a long road ahead.
"Stop Asking Your Friends What to Text Her"
Your buddy Dave has been single for three years and thinks "hey u up" is a valid strategy. Your other buddy Mike just got dumped and told you to "just be yourself."
You showed them her text. You asked them to decode the emoji. You drafted four responses and sent the screenshot to the group chat for a vote.
She's been waiting forty minutes.
Put the phone down. Stop crowdsourcing your love life. Type something that sounds like you. Hit send. Then go do literally anything else with your evening.
Yes we definitely need to move beyond the current rhetoric...but I would say the current media interest in the FED provides a 'teaching moment' for those of us in the know.Danger said:Both of which are empty gains when you really think about it.