Seems to be getting some public traction.
http://finance.yahoo.com/news/happens-end-fed-185459981.html
http://finance.yahoo.com/news/happens-end-fed-185459981.html
“The 22 Rules That Flip the Script With Women… And How You Can Use Them Tonight”
Most guys accidentally kill attraction before they even speak. They assume they need a bigger bank account, a better physique, or smoother lines. They miss the point.
Female desire operates on a specific set of psychological triggers. Break them, and you're invisible. Follow them, and you become magnetic.
I learned this the hard way. Years of freezing up. Getting friend-zoned. Watching other guys walk away with the girl I wanted. Then I discovered a set of 22 simple rules that rewired my entire approach.
Ending the Federal Reserve
- Thread starter Burroughs
- Start date
Just because a woman listens to you and acts interested in what you say doesn't mean she really is. She might just be acting polite, while silently wishing that the date would hurry up and end, or that you would go away... and never come back.
Quote taken from The SoSuave Guide to Women and Dating, which you can read for FREE.
Julius_Seizeher
Master Don Juan
I don't take most of the "End the Fed" movement seriously, yet, because while they see the problems of central banking (and thus central planning and socialism), they are not yet calling en masse for the only alternative to central banking/fiat money: a gold standard.
They do not draw the correlation. In the absence of a central bank, the dollar must be based on gold and silver. But generations of college professors and media shysters like Paul Krugman have told us that reality isn't real and thus gold isn't real (but their counterfeit paper is).
Are you beginning to see the correlation? The statists had to smear and destroy the concept of the gold standard in order to smuggle this country into an ineffective, stagnant, burdensome bureaucratic socialism state where central banks and fiat money serve their deficit spending and welfare statism goals. And look at what it has achieved, all that prattling about "the common good" and "evolved sensibilities".
It is only in reality, and in freedom, that man can exist and achieve a life worth living. The more we try to cheat reality in the name of "the common good", the common destruction is all we will achieve.
It is also to the benefit of the anti-Fed movement that the socialist welfare states of Europe are crumbling before our very eyes. You see, there is no dichotomy between the moral and the practical; the moral is the practical. It is moral for man to live in freedom, and practical for each man to bear the responsibilities that freedom entails.
We have always been told that this country escaped a century of barbarism when we came off the gold standard; we are now seeing that the statists (beginning with FDR) have used the wrong tense.
They do not draw the correlation. In the absence of a central bank, the dollar must be based on gold and silver. But generations of college professors and media shysters like Paul Krugman have told us that reality isn't real and thus gold isn't real (but their counterfeit paper is).
Are you beginning to see the correlation? The statists had to smear and destroy the concept of the gold standard in order to smuggle this country into an ineffective, stagnant, burdensome bureaucratic socialism state where central banks and fiat money serve their deficit spending and welfare statism goals. And look at what it has achieved, all that prattling about "the common good" and "evolved sensibilities".
It is only in reality, and in freedom, that man can exist and achieve a life worth living. The more we try to cheat reality in the name of "the common good", the common destruction is all we will achieve.
It is also to the benefit of the anti-Fed movement that the socialist welfare states of Europe are crumbling before our very eyes. You see, there is no dichotomy between the moral and the practical; the moral is the practical. It is moral for man to live in freedom, and practical for each man to bear the responsibilities that freedom entails.
We have always been told that this country escaped a century of barbarism when we came off the gold standard; we are now seeing that the statists (beginning with FDR) have used the wrong tense.
Well, Ron Paul was the one who basically started the whole "End the Fed" thing. He talks a lot about the role of gold when it comes to monetary policy. I wouldn't be surprised if more and more people start talking about it if the movement gets serious. But honestly, if you told me more people would soon be discussing this stuff soon back in 2007, I wouldn't have believed it at all. I'm glad there is at least some progress, even if it's a little...Julius_Seizeher said:I don't take most of the "End the Fed" movement seriously, yet, because while they see the problems of central banking (and thus central planning and socialism), they are not yet calling en masse for the only alternative to central banking/fiat money: a gold standard.
They do not draw the correlation. In the absence of a central bank, the dollar must be based on gold and silver. But generations of college professors and media shysters like Paul Krugman have told us that reality isn't real and thus gold isn't real (but their counterfeit paper is).
Are you beginning to see the correlation? The statists had to smear and destroy the concept of the gold standard in order to smuggle this country into an ineffective, stagnant, burdensome bureaucratic socialism state where central banks and fiat money serve their deficit spending and welfare statism goals. And look at what it has achieved, all that prattling about "the common good" and "evolved sensibilities".
It is only in reality, and in freedom, that man can exist and achieve a life worth living. The more we try to cheat reality in the name of "the common good", the common destruction is all we will achieve.
It is also to the benefit of the anti-Fed movement that the socialist welfare states of Europe are crumbling before our very eyes. You see, there is no dichotomy between the moral and the practical; the moral is the practical. It is moral for man to live in freedom, and practical for each man to bear the responsibilities that freedom entails.
We have always been told that this country escaped a century of barbarism when we came off the gold standard; we are now seeing that the statists (beginning with FDR) have used the wrong tense.
I feel the same way...that's why I posted it.Falcon said:, if you told me more people would soon be discussing this stuff soon back in 2007, I wouldn't have believed it at all. I'm glad there is at least some progress, even if it's a little...
I would never have believed a year ago that ending the FED would become a semi mainstream topic to the point where CNN And yahoo cover it openly.
Of course we have a long road ahead.
What happens, IN HER MIND, is that she comes to see you as WORTHLESS simply because she hasn't had to INVEST anything in you in order to get you or to keep you.
You were an interesting diversion while she had nothing else to do. But now that someone a little more valuable has come along, someone who expects her to treat him very well, she'll have no problem at all dropping you or demoting you to lowly "friendship" status.
Quote taken from The SoSuave Guide to Women and Dating, which you can read for FREE.
Yes we definitely need to move beyond the current rhetoric...but I would say the current media interest in the FED provides a 'teaching moment' for those of us in the know.Danger said:Both of which are empty gains when you really think about it.