The supposed benefits of marriage for men are often cited: higher incomes on average, longer lifespans, etc. I’ve always been skeptical that this is indicative of marriage benefiting men. In my opinion it’s merely the result of women sexually selecting for the highest quality men. For example, on average a married American man is two inches taller than his non-married counterparts. Should we therefore conclude that marriage makes men grow taller? No, this would be absurd, as virtually all married men’s growth plates have closed at the time of marriage. We can only conclude that the reason for the discrepancy in height is women sexually selecting for taller men. Shouldn’t we also conclude that women are also sexually selecting for higher earning and healthier men as well? And, that being the case, that this is the primary reason for the alleged benefits of marriage for men?
I’m confident that if we as a society outlawed marriage, it would have little discernible impact on the life outcomes of men on average. The men who are currently married would still be wealthier, healthier and taller. Of course, such an experiment is nearly impossible to conduct.
I’m confident that if we as a society outlawed marriage, it would have little discernible impact on the life outcomes of men on average. The men who are currently married would still be wealthier, healthier and taller. Of course, such an experiment is nearly impossible to conduct.
