Did Elizabeth Warren just take a jab at incels?

[Poonani Maker]

Adios, America: The Left's Plan to Turn Our Country into a Third World Hellhole: Coulter, Ann: 9781621576068: Amazon.com: Books

Adios, America: The Left's Plan to Turn Our Country into a Third World Hellhole [Coulter, Ann] on Amazon.com. *FREE* shipping on qualifying offers. Adios, America: The Left's Plan to Turn Our Country into a Third World Hellhole

www.amazon.com

She doesn't write a book on it exposing who's doing it like Maulkin, just says "the 'Left'" wow so descriptive

 

[Epic Days]

She doesn't write a book on it exposing who's doing it like Maulkin, just says "the 'Left'" wow so descriptive

It is accurate. The “left” keeps it obscure on purpose. Some of us do know who the creators of feminism are but that’s another subject.
The Left operates as a collective. There is no actual target to address.
Hence they have no guilt fingers that can point at very specific people or causes. Plausible deniability.
You can’t prosecute a collective.

 

[DonJoel]

Any man who votes liberal is a lost cause. Men are the net contributors to the tax base, white men especially. All liberal policies are ultimately based on wealth transfer from men, especially straight white men. There's a reason women and minorities love liberal politics. It is because they get free stuff.

 

[Poonani Maker]

Any man who votes liberal is a lost cause. Men are the net contributors to the tax base, white men especially. All liberal policies are ultimately based on wealth transfer from men, especially straight white men. There's a reason women and minorities love liberal politics. It is because they get free stuff.

And if they can't get sweat-money from US, they'll just print it (type in '1s' and '0s') to distribute it to themselves and theirs. Either way, it's genocide, slow and abrupt and it is flaunted/out in the open now. When we are genocided eventually, they'll continue on printing (typing in money to their large but dwindling accounts) money as the sole source of their wealth. Of course, THEN there will be no resistance but willing slaves. Genghis Khan was stopped at Vienna. There were Many alphas in the Western world, yet only ONE alpha (no challengers) can exist in a tribe in the East, that is Genghis Khan. All these alphas in the western world kept each other's power in check. There will be none of that once we (our genes) are gone.

 

[Bokanovsky]

That’s not what I got from it. Sounds like folks are internalizing this.

What did you get out of it?

 

[EyeBRollin]

What did you get out of it?

I got that she took a swipe at angry conservative men who for some reason are mad that other people can marry the same sex. And I agree with her sentiment. Live your truth and your life. No one is stopping you or anyone else from marrying a woman.

 

[EyeBRollin]

Any man who votes liberal is a lost cause. Men are the net contributors to the tax base, white men especially. All liberal policies are ultimately based on wealth transfer from men, especially straight white men. There's a reason women and minorities love liberal politics. It is because they get free stuff.

Wealth transfer is necessary for a social democracy to function. You’d prefer the transfer from the poor to the rich. That’s a great way to burn society to the ground.

Google gini coefficient and identify which countries on the high end you’d actually like to live in.

 

[Alvafe]

my my guys, I would say she finally is getting it, she said she assumed its was a men then to marry her, then said if she could find one, serious it not a incel jab its a jab to all woman, a men need to find a woman, he certainly if he respect himself he will never marry a low class wh, so since most woman are low class wh, he won't marry anytime soon.

guys you need to spin things to your favor more and be less trigered by this, if you failed to spin this to your way you are letting morons like her win

 

[Bokanovsky]

Wealth transfer is necessary for a social democracy to function. You’d prefer the transfer from the poor to the rich. That’s a great way to burn society to the ground.

Why in the world would I want "social democracy"? I want democracy without socialism, just the way the founding fathers intended. There is a reason why, until the 19th century, you had to be a property owner to vote (and not just in America but in other English-speaking nations as well). You didn't have to be rich; you just had to be a productive member of society - a contributor, not a leach. Those who depend on the state for handouts should not have a say in elections, as they will always vote for candidates who promise them "free stuff".

 

[Alvafe]

Why in the world would I want "social democracy"? I want democracy without socialism, just the way the founding fathers intended. There is a reason why, until the 19th century, you had to be a property owner to vote (and not just in America but in other English-speaking nations as well). You didn't have to be rich; you just had to be a productive member of society - a contributor, not a leach. Those who depend on the state for handouts should not have a say in elections, as they will always vote for candidates who promise them "free stuff".

and here I thought social democracy was from poor to the rich

 

[EyeBRollin]

Why in the world would I want "social democracy"? I want democracy without socialism, just the way the founding fathers intended. There is a reason why, until the 19th century, you had to be a property owner to vote (and not just in America but in other English-speaking nations as well). You didn't have to be rich; you just had to be a productive member of society - a contributor, not a leach. Those who depend on the state for handouts should not have a say in elections, as they will always vote for candidates who promise them "free stuff".

Democracy without some degree of socialism doesn't exist. Unless you're willing to provide an example country?

 

[EyeBRollin]

Gini coefficient is just a measurement for degree of socialism.

"Social Democracy" is also a euphimism for socialism.

Democracy exists without socialism. One is a political mechanism and the other is an economic mechanism.

But socialists will twist whatever they can in order to steal from you and silence you at the same time.

Gini coefficient is simply the statistical dispersion of the wealth and income inequality of a nation. Your framing is slanted (no surprise there). Am I correct in inferring that you think the United States would be better with a higher gini coefficient?

 

[EyeBRollin]

Do these whiny grievances have any logic to them or are you just spouting more right wing persecution complex BS?

Now the Left wants to drop the voting age to 16(under what pretext, this time?), and would drop it to 6, without opposition from the Right.

Strawman argument, otherwise known as lying. Who on the left proposed reducing the voting age to 6?

you should've been born in American, and spent 20(minimum) of your first 30 years here, in order to be eligible to vote

Why should naturalized citizens not have the right to vote?

I'd favor an IQ test, too. If you score 100 or better

What tangible benefit would this unconstitutional (via 24th Amendment) restriction provide?

reached your 30 birthday

Unconstitutional via 26th Amendment. What benefit would this provide?

recipient of public assistance for the previous 10 years

Unconstitutional via 24th Amendment. What benefit would this provide?

Putting aside your blatant disregard for the United States Constitution, why are you angry about voting rights?

 

[Bokanovsky]

Democracy without some degree of socialism doesn't exist. Unless you're willing to provide an example country?

Examples:

• The Roman Republic
• America (and the 13 Colonies prior to the Revolution) from the 1600's to the mid 1800's
• Great Britain (prior to the mid-1800's)
• The Dutch Republic (1581-1795)
• Switzerland, until fairly recently

 

[EyeBRollin]

Examples:

• The Roman Republic
• America (and the 13 Colonies prior to the Revolution) from the 1600's to the mid 1800's
• Great Britain (prior to the mid-1800's)
• The Dutch Republic (1581-1795)
• Switzerland, until fairly recently

What do those all have in common?

 

[EyeBRollin]

My framing is factual. You can call it "income inequality", which is just another way of saying "not socialist".

My inference is that you are suggesting that wealth confiscation is necessary for a democracy. And yet you have not explained how you came to this conclusion.

Or perhaps you want to define "social democracy" for us?

Dodged the question. Am I correct in inferring that you think the United States would be better with a higher gini coefficient?

 

[EyeBRollin]

No you are incorrect.

This is a lie then. According to you a higher gini coefficient would correlate to lower socialism:

Gini coefficient is just a measurement for degree of socialism.

 

[Bokanovsky]

What do those all have in common?

They functioned well and led to unprecedented prosperity, until suffrage was extended to too many unqualified voters, which was the beginning of the end.

 

[EyeBRollin]

They functioned well and led to unprecedented prosperity, until suffrage was extended to too many unqualified voters, which was the beginning of the end.

That's what we call revisionist history. Try again.

 

[EyeBRollin]

According to the definition of gini, a lower coefficient means more income equality (more socialist).

I have not made any inference that moving in either direction from it's current state is better or worse for the US.

This is another lie. You commented that socialism is bad, and that lower gini coefficient is "more socialist." Therefore, higher gini coefficient would be less socialist. Yet you refused to endorse less socialism. Why?