Poonani Maker
Master Don Juan
- Joined
- Apr 29, 2007
- Messages
- 4,421
- Reaction score
- 927
Coulter toes the line, no balls, no children, Muslim boyfriend.She's no Coulter.
Hello Friend,
If this is your first visit to SoSuave, I would advise you to START HERE.
It will be the most efficient use of your time.
And you will learn everything you need to know to become a huge success with women.
Thank you for visiting and have a great day!
Coulter toes the line, no balls, no children, Muslim boyfriend.She's no Coulter.
Coulter toes the line, no balls, no children, Muslim boyfriend.
She doesn't write a book on it exposing who's doing it like Maulkin, just says "the 'Left'" wow so descriptiveAdios, America: The Left's Plan to Turn Our Country into a Third World Hellhole: Coulter, Ann: 9781621576068: Amazon.com: Books
Adios, America: The Left's Plan to Turn Our Country into a Third World Hellhole [Coulter, Ann] on Amazon.com. *FREE* shipping on qualifying offers. Adios, America: The Left's Plan to Turn Our Country into a Third World Hellholewww.amazon.com
It is accurate. The “left” keeps it obscure on purpose. Some of us do know who the creators of feminism are but that’s another subject.She doesn't write a book on it exposing who's doing it like Maulkin, just says "the 'Left'" wow so descriptive
And if they can't get sweat-money from US, they'll just print it (type in '1s' and '0s') to distribute it to themselves and theirs. Either way, it's genocide, slow and abrupt and it is flaunted/out in the open now. When we are genocided eventually, they'll continue on printing (typing in money to their large but dwindling accounts) money as the sole source of their wealth. Of course, THEN there will be no resistance but willing slaves. Genghis Khan was stopped at Vienna. There were Many alphas in the Western world, yet only ONE alpha (no challengers) can exist in a tribe in the East, that is Genghis Khan. All these alphas in the western world kept each other's power in check. There will be none of that once we (our genes) are gone.Any man who votes liberal is a lost cause. Men are the net contributors to the tax base, white men especially. All liberal policies are ultimately based on wealth transfer from men, especially straight white men. There's a reason women and minorities love liberal politics. It is because they get free stuff.
What did you get out of it?That’s not what I got from it. Sounds like folks are internalizing this.
Fixed it for you.Any man who votes is a lost cause.
I got that she took a swipe at angry conservative men who for some reason are mad that other people can marry the same sex. And I agree with her sentiment. Live your truth and your life. No one is stopping you or anyone else from marrying a woman.What did you get out of it?
Wealth transfer is necessary for a social democracy to function. You’d prefer the transfer from the poor to the rich. That’s a great way to burn society to the ground.Any man who votes liberal is a lost cause. Men are the net contributors to the tax base, white men especially. All liberal policies are ultimately based on wealth transfer from men, especially straight white men. There's a reason women and minorities love liberal politics. It is because they get free stuff.
Why in the world would I want "social democracy"? I want democracy without socialism, just the way the founding fathers intended. There is a reason why, until the 19th century, you had to be a property owner to vote (and not just in America but in other English-speaking nations as well). You didn't have to be rich; you just had to be a productive member of society - a contributor, not a leach. Those who depend on the state for handouts should not have a say in elections, as they will always vote for candidates who promise them "free stuff".Wealth transfer is necessary for a social democracy to function. You’d prefer the transfer from the poor to the rich. That’s a great way to burn society to the ground.
and here I thought social democracy was from poor to the richWhy in the world would I want "social democracy"? I want democracy without socialism, just the way the founding fathers intended. There is a reason why, until the 19th century, you had to be a property owner to vote (and not just in America but in other English-speaking nations as well). You didn't have to be rich; you just had to be a productive member of society - a contributor, not a leach. Those who depend on the state for handouts should not have a say in elections, as they will always vote for candidates who promise them "free stuff".
Democracy without some degree of socialism doesn't exist. Unless you're willing to provide an example country?Why in the world would I want "social democracy"? I want democracy without socialism, just the way the founding fathers intended. There is a reason why, until the 19th century, you had to be a property owner to vote (and not just in America but in other English-speaking nations as well). You didn't have to be rich; you just had to be a productive member of society - a contributor, not a leach. Those who depend on the state for handouts should not have a say in elections, as they will always vote for candidates who promise them "free stuff".
Gini coefficient is simply the statistical dispersion of the wealth and income inequality of a nation. Your framing is slanted (no surprise there). Am I correct in inferring that you think the United States would be better with a higher gini coefficient?Gini coefficient is just a measurement for degree of socialism.
"Social Democracy" is also a euphimism for socialism.
Democracy exists without socialism. One is a political mechanism and the other is an economic mechanism.
But socialists will twist whatever they can in order to steal from you and silence you at the same time.
Strawman argument, otherwise known as lying. Who on the left proposed reducing the voting age to 6?Now the Left wants to drop the voting age to 16(under what pretext, this time?), and would drop it to 6, without opposition from the Right.
Why should naturalized citizens not have the right to vote?you should've been born in American, and spent 20(minimum) of your first 30 years here, in order to be eligible to vote
What tangible benefit would this unconstitutional (via 24th Amendment) restriction provide?I'd favor an IQ test, too. If you score 100 or better
Unconstitutional via 26th Amendment. What benefit would this provide?reached your 30 birthday
Unconstitutional via 24th Amendment. What benefit would this provide?recipient of public assistance for the previous 10 years
Examples:Democracy without some degree of socialism doesn't exist. Unless you're willing to provide an example country?
What do those all have in common?Examples:
- The Roman Republic
- America (and the 13 Colonies prior to the Revolution) from the 1600's to the mid 1800's
- Great Britain (prior to the mid-1800's)
- The Dutch Republic (1581-1795)
- Switzerland, until fairly recently
Dodged the question. Am I correct in inferring that you think the United States would be better with a higher gini coefficient?My framing is factual. You can call it "income inequality", which is just another way of saying "not socialist".
My inference is that you are suggesting that wealth confiscation is necessary for a democracy. And yet you have not explained how you came to this conclusion.
Or perhaps you want to define "social democracy" for us?
This is a lie then. According to you a higher gini coefficient would correlate to lower socialism:No you are incorrect.
Gini coefficient is just a measurement for degree of socialism.