( . )( . )
Banned
Who "bemoaned" it ? Has anyone (besides you) even mentioned that in this thread yet?jurry said:The rise of sexual partner count versus number of sexual acts, that was the current discussion you initiated, I believe, and leads one to wonder why so many "DJ's" would be bemoaning the rise of "wh0redom" in the first place if it would make their lifestyles more socially acceptable.
And even if they had do you really need an explanation as to why a bunch of ex-carousel riders sporting the thousand c@ck stare and cats is ultimately unhealthy for higher civilization? I don't think you're that stupid.
Edit:
This Bible Belt is why we have a 10 post limit. The loveshack gang rack up posts like nobodies business.jurry said:EDIT (at the limit): lol
No she can't. This has already been discussed ad nauseam. Statistics show it only takes a sampling of 6 different c@cks for a woman's ability to long term pair bond decrease by 70%. (Men instinctively know all this anyway) Men and women are just built different, physically and mentally designed for different things, you're going to have to deal with it.jurry said:The problem is you only know absolutes, she is either a submissive housewife or "you-gogrrling it in the club toilet" and a "carousel rider".. she can't just be an average person travelling from relationship to relationship.
Get your head out of you're ass woman. If men were "controlling" you you wouldn't all end up over medicated, herding cats and crying into your red wine. Stop projecting.jurry said:If you cant control what she does, then fvck her shes a slut bringing down the whole society, right?
She prays just before she diddles herself to sleep.jurry said:I've had a number of the same discussions with you before.. so just man up and..
What the hell? You asked the question I answered it. This isn't your diary sugar tits.jurry said:What the fvck do i care if women are less likely to form LTR??
Last edited: