Attraction runs on a clock.
She flirted for weeks. Touched your arm. Found reasons to be alone with you. And you were careful. Respectful. Waiting for the right moment.
The moment had a shelf life. It expired around month two, and by the time you asked her out, she'd quietly filed you under "little brother."
One of the hardest lessons inside the 22 Rules: women rarely wait. Interest either grows or it decays, and nothing decays it faster than a man who never moves.
Make the move while she's still inventing reasons to be near you.
She calls you when her car breaks down. When she needs help moving. When some guy she's actually dating treats her badly.
You're the listener. The reliable one. The guy who would treat her so much better, if she'd just open her eyes.
She won't. You trained her to see you as the low-effort option — the friend who requires zero risk and zero investment. Every favor dug the hole deeper.
The "22 Rules" break the pattern. You'll stop auditioning for a role she already cast and become the man she chases instead. It starts with Rule 1.
Actually, that IS covered in the manual you have to study to get your license. Yes, there are bad drivers who are inconsiderate to cyclists. However, anyone riding on the streets should have to have a license. Motorcyclists have to get a special license and so should bicyclists. I can't even count the number of times I have seen bicyclists riding on roads they have no business being on. I remember one incident where I was driving a van full of handicapped people to a county fair. There were around ten bicyclists on the narrow, hilly and twisty road. You could not pass them, they were going VERY slow and there was a line of traffic backed up behind them as far as the eye could see. That is extremely inconsiderate and rude for bicyclists to ride on roads where they cause traffic congestion and a hazard.Originally posted by Francisco d'Anconia
Until then it would be nice if drivers would be tested on how to share the roads with cyclists before being given their license. Hell, at least teach them how to use their turn signals!
Am i wrong to have found that funny?Originally posted by Wyldfire
I remember one incident where I was driving a van full of handicapped people to a county fair.
She calls you when her car breaks down. When she needs help moving. When some guy she's actually dating treats her badly.
You're the listener. The reliable one. The guy who would treat her so much better, if she'd just open her eyes.
She won't. You trained her to see you as the low-effort option — the friend who requires zero risk and zero investment. Every favor dug the hole deeper.
The "22 Rules" break the pattern. You'll stop auditioning for a role she already cast and become the man she chases instead. It starts with Rule 1.
i know what im doing but i agree that so many others do not, and there should be compolsery training for it. The only problem is the second you introduce that suddenly the number of cyclists plunge, and the authoritys do not want that to happen. I guess the only way they can do that is teach it in schools as part of the compolsery ciriculm.Originally posted by WesCottII
Am i wrong to have found that funny?
In any case, my opinion is that Wlyd is right. Cyclists should get a license to go on the road, as she rightly points out, a motorcyclist (ie. Me) has to. Anyone using the road has to be in sync with what everyone else is doing, and in my experience, cyclists do whatever they please.
No cars, vans, trucks or otherwise can "overtake" a long trail of a dozen cyclists on a twisty and hilly road that doesn't allow any passing at all. That's why the idiots should NOT have been on that road because even cars can't pass each other on it. It's one sharp turn after another and lots of hills.Originally posted by check_mate_kid_uk
women drivers! not our fault you cant over take properly, but i guess your not the worst van driver, iv had a driver try and squueze me off the road by attempting to over take me yards before a bridge. When i saw the fcukeri had to pull out in to the middle of the road so that he could not overtake. Apprntly he did not read the sign saying "do not over take cyclists under the bridge"
It will only discourage the jacka$$es who make themselves a hazard to the safety of everyone else, and I think that's a GOOD thing.Originally posted by check_mate_kid_uk
i know what im doing but i agree that so many others do not, and there should be compolsery training for it. The only problem is the second you introduce that suddenly the number of cyclists plunge, and the authoritys do not want that to happen. I guess the only way they can do that is teach it in schools as part of the compolsery ciriculm.
No it will discourage most people, only real enthusiasts and commueters will cycle on road. Here the goverment are woried about introducing laws making helmets compolsery, so if that stops people cycling think what needing a licesne would do. Oh and whats worse, beeing a but delayed by a cyclist, or being 1 of over 3000 people killed every year by other driver, weather its a cyclist another driver or a pedestrian.Originally posted by Wyldfire
It will only discourage the jacka$$es who make themselves a hazard to the safety of everyone else, and I think that's a GOOD thing.
No Wyld, that doesn't make you great, it makes you competent. A great driver is someone who can drive like the girl from Jackie Chan's "who am i?" (think it's that film). You're just OK.Originally posted by Wyldfire
I happen to be a great driver. I got my license 21 years ago and have never had an accident or even a speeding ticket.
You've replayed it a hundred times. She stood three feet away, scrolling her phone. You had an opening. You composed the perfect line — after she was gone.
For all you know, she's married now. To some guy who said something. Anything.
Openers are cheap. Almost any sentence works when it's delivered within three seconds. The expensive part is the standing there, drafting and deleting, while the window quietly closes.
The "22 Rules" stripped out my hesitation. What to open with, how to keep it alive, and the one habit that costs guys more women than anything else: waiting for perfect.
I think it would be WONDERFUL to get anyone who isn't serious enough about SAFETY to take a licensing test off the roadway. And helmets SHOULD be mandatory...and only a moron would ride without one in traffic.Originally posted by check_mate_kid_uk
No it will discourage most people, only real enthusiasts and commueters will cycle on road. Here the goverment are woried about introducing laws making helmets compolsery, so if that stops people cycling think what needing a licesne would do. Oh and whats worse, beeing a but delayed by a cyclist, or being 1 of over 3000 people killed every year by other driver, weather its a cyclist another driver or a pedestrian.
No...I'm a great driver. I've managed to avoid many would be accidents due to the sh*tty driving of others and inclement weather. I used to have to drive 45 minutes to work for 3rd shift during blizzards before any plowing, salting or sanding was done. I've never even slid off the road before.Originally posted by WesCottII
No Wyld, that doesn't make you great, it makes you competent. A great driver is someone who can drive like the girl from Jackie Chan's "who am i?" (think it's that film). You're just OK.
No need for that arrogance.
I have no problem with re-testing people who drive cars, motorcycles, big trucks, etc. I actually think it would be a good idea because as people get older they forget things. Up to age 50 people should be re-tested every 10 years. Then every 5 years until 65 and then every 2 years from then on.Originally posted by check_mate_kid_uk
Wyldfire you say all cyclists should be tested, there is deffintly argument for this case, but what about drivers being re-tested. I have seen a program called britians worst drivers, 1 for examples staled the car on a bust junction, another took 17 points to do a 3 point turn. I think drivers should be re tested every 5 or 10 years, just because you passed a test when you where 20 does not mean you are competent to drive when you are 60 and havent touched a car for the last 15 years. That liscence does not make you magicly good enough to drive.
When a woman says it, guys hear a confession. A heads-up. A scheduling conflict.
Here's the translation: I don't feel anything. Right now. With you.
Watch what happens when a man triggers actual attraction. The busy career, the recent breakup, the "not in a place to date" — all of it evaporates instantly. The same woman who was guarding her freedom is suddenly free every night.
The "22 Rules" explain why. When the right switches flip, her timeline rearranges itself around you.
Has your father had to commute via Spaghetti Junction in Atlanta doing 85 mph in bumper to bumper traffic with 5 narrow lanes each way of drivers weaving in and out? When someone drives under the worst conditions for a long period of time (blizzards before plowing occurs with snow drifts, low visibility, black ice, horrendous traffic, etc) and never gotten into any accidents or gotten any tickets it qualifies them as being a great driver. Seeing as you have never been a passenger with me behind the wheel under very bad conditions I don't believe you are in any position to state whether I am a great driver or not. However, seeing as I AM aware of how I drive, I think it's safe to say that I'm a much better authority on the subject of MY driving then you are.Originally posted by WesCottII
So? Still doesn't make you great. My dad has been driving 32 years. He's never had an accident. Does that make him great? Greater than you? No. Makes him the level he should be after passing his test.
The speed limit there isn't over 65mph, but you can't do just 65 mph when everyone else is doing 85mph and it's bumper to bumper or you'll cause a wreck. You have to keep the pace with the rest of traffic or you'll cause a hellacious pile up for miles. It's not like most city traffic that comes to a grinding halt when it's bumper to bumper. I've never seen any place quite like it before. I'm not sure if it's still that bad now because I lived there many years ago shortly after Spaghetti Junction was opened. Your heart felt like it was literally in your throat until you got further out away from Atlanta.Originally posted by check_mate_kid_uk
85mph? dont you have speed limits, here in the UK the speed limit on the motor way is 70mph although i must say, it is totaly ignored, cars tend to cruise at about 80mph, you get the odd nutters doing 110mph
You paid for dinner. You drove. You said "whatever you want is fine" every single time. All the effort, no expectations.
And she left anyway — probably for a guy who makes her pick up the pizza.
Painful. Also predictable. Her mind quietly concludes that anything requiring zero effort from her is worth exactly zero. You became a free sample, and free samples get taken for granted.
The 22 Rules flip the dynamic. Small shifts that get her investing effort, money, and time in you — until SHE'S the one afraid of losing YOU.