YawataNoKami
Master Don Juan
- Joined
- May 10, 2013
- Messages
- 821
- Reaction score
- 306
You replay the conversation at 2 a.m. She texted back fast yesterday. Today, nothing. Was that smile friendly or flirty? What did the shoulder touch mean?
Every hour you spend decoding her signals drains your confidence and hands her the controls. Women can sense that insecurity from across the room — and it repels them.
One of the "22 Rules" kills the obsession on the spot: assume she likes you, and act accordingly. Sounds too simple. Works anyway.
Her interest tends to rise to meet your expectations. Psychologists call it a self-fulfilling prophecy.
You've replayed it a hundred times. She stood three feet away, scrolling her phone. You had an opening. You composed the perfect line — after she was gone.
For all you know, she's married now. To some guy who said something. Anything.
Openers are cheap. Almost any sentence works when it's delivered within three seconds. The expensive part is the standing there, drafting and deleting, while the window quietly closes.
The "22 Rules" stripped out my hesitation. What to open with, how to keep it alive, and the one habit that costs guys more women than anything else: waiting for perfect.
And you know they were random and not made by them how?If it was not staged, why were they picking up random signs and not already holding ones they made?
You made your case like a lawyer. Stable job. Good guy. Ready for something real. All true. All irrelevant.
She weighed your points, nodded along, felt nothing — then fell hard for some tattooed bartender with a motorcycle and a gambling problem.
Logic is where attraction goes to die. The "22 Rules" work a level deeper, on the subconscious switches that decide within minutes whether you register as a MAN or as part of the furniture.
Stop presenting evidence. Start flipping switches.
Apparently you are not understanding the question. How, EXACTLY, can you prove that the signs were random and made by CNN rather than the protesters?Did you see them just picking them up off the pile in front of cnn?
CNN professional shark jumpers, are running out of Trump hate tricks to play.Fake fact checker.
If it was not staged, why were they picking up random signs and not already holding ones they made?
Apparently you are not understanding the question. How, EXACTLY, can you prove that the signs were random and made by CNN rather than the protesters?
I could've sworn this thread was made claiming said footage was staged. The burden is on the accusers.How can you prove they were made by the "protestors"?
Three seconds. That's how long it took. Your shoes. Your posture. The way you held your drink. Whether you looked at the floor or looked at her.
She already filed you away. Interesting. Boring. Safe. Bold. Before you even opened your mouth.
Everything you say after that is just her confirming what she already decided.
So stop rehearsing lines. Fix the first three seconds. Stand tall. Look up. Smile like you mean it. Walk like you belong wherever you're standing.
The words come later. The impression comes first.
There are white helmet organization, it works in Syria, not sure wtf it really does, I guess some humanitaria sh1t. You have not seen it on your yellow CNN or other news channels, maybe on RT, but here in Russia we seen them. Basically these assh0les are staging seens, and they showed videos of them staging. Most recent, the chemical attack in Syria was staged. They are also known to work with ISIS, and they do shoot people to take that perfect shot.