Captain Harlock
Senior Don Juan
Private boys schools are a bunch of bullcrap anyway. Those spoiled brats need to learn to keep their arrogance in check.
Your buddy Dave has been single for three years and thinks "hey u up" is a valid strategy. Your other buddy Mike just got dumped and told you to "just be yourself."
You showed them her text. You asked them to decode the emoji. You drafted four responses and sent the screenshot to the group chat for a vote.
She's been waiting forty minutes.
Put the phone down. Stop crowdsourcing your love life. Type something that sounds like you. Hit send. Then go do literally anything else with your evening.
When a woman says it, guys hear a confession. A heads-up. A scheduling conflict.
Here's the translation: I don't feel anything. Right now. With you.
Watch what happens when a man triggers actual attraction. The busy career, the recent breakup, the "not in a place to date" — all of it evaporates instantly. The same woman who was guarding her freedom is suddenly free every night.
The "22 Rules" explain why. When the right switches flip, her timeline rearranges itself around you.
Hmmm, you might be talking about me there, Hans :moon:Captain Harlock said:Private boys schools are a bunch of bullcrap anyway. Those spoiled brats need to learn to keep their arrogance in check.
prairiedog24 said:EQ simply means your ability to feel/understand/empathize with other people, and read their emotional ques.
You've replayed it a hundred times. She stood three feet away, scrolling her phone. You had an opening. You composed the perfect line — after she was gone.
For all you know, she's married now. To some guy who said something. Anything.
Openers are cheap. Almost any sentence works when it's delivered within three seconds. The expensive part is the standing there, drafting and deleting, while the window quietly closes.
The "22 Rules" stripped out my hesitation. What to open with, how to keep it alive, and the one habit that costs guys more women than anything else: waiting for perfect.
Hey, social engineer, leave those kids aloneUnbridled_Phoenix said:We don't need no state castration, we don't need no man control
Attraction runs on a clock.
She flirted for weeks. Touched your arm. Found reasons to be alone with you. And you were careful. Respectful. Waiting for the right moment.
The moment had a shelf life. It expired around month two, and by the time you asked her out, she'd quietly filed you under "little brother."
One of the hardest lessons inside the 22 Rules: women rarely wait. Interest either grows or it decays, and nothing decays it faster than a man who never moves.
Make the move while she's still inventing reasons to be near you.
I totally agree. This is absolutely feminist/anti male ideology at work masquerading as "fairness" and benefical for males. There's no question in my mind that these "educators" will in practice cause males more emotional harm. They will teach them to be consumate AFCs. Their solution is part of the problem. The problem with males is femniism and how women are now priviliged and never wrong.jophil28 said:.
These new age fads crept into the public school system here about twenty many ago. The promoters lauded the programs with all the flowery hype that we get down here from third rate leftist psych types.
They promised more social and gender equity, however they ultimately delivered a contaminated and feminised social education system in which boys were punished for even mild expressions of masculinity and girls were rewarded for being bratty little baitches.
Feminist ideology at work masquerading as "fairness".
Dang! Warrior sometimes you come across as so closed minded. Personally, I think a lot of problems we have stem from people not being in touch with themselves (that would also include male-male and male-female relationships). Your attitude towards this EQ idea is one of such. You say people can learn this stuff at home right? Did you figure out all you needed to know about women and dating at home? hence sosuave and similar sites and books. I feel the EQ idea is good but your fears that such a noble idea might be perveted is understandable. Still when one is thought something one still has a choice to apply what they've been taught. In the end they are informed about something. After learning so much from sosuave if I was in the education system. I'd require them to have a dating class. Because everything we do as human beings deals with relationship and these are important things you don't learn at home.Warrior74 said:Don't make excuses for them. Learning to check your emotions is something you learn at home.
IronStar said:Just out of curiosity, in an educational setting, does the school "grade" the student in "EQ" ? How does he pass or fail?
Sounds like an obtuse question, but when I went to school, I went to learn. I did stuff. If I was good at football, I made the soccer team. If I did my maths homework, and understood, and demonstrated that understanding under examination conditions, I passed or failed.
There was an objective measure of my success (or lack thereof).
As for socialisation, I was left to my own devices. Made some friends, made some enemies but mostly people were indifferent to me. I made my own mistakes, and learnt from them. It was only when I stepped out of line that the school intervened (& only then if they found out)
I'm more curious than anything has to how "EQ" can be taught. Most people learn this by example, they react, s1t happens, they learn (hopefully) by trial and error. I know what I should do & how I should react when a woman dumps me, but when it happens I'm going to get p1ssed off. Its how I handle myself & my own reaction that counts.
It strikes me as a papering over the cracks exercise, the question is surely why kids have to be taught "EQ" in the first place, when they should be learning it through their family & their peers by example, not from a textbook.
I could talk to any woman I wasn't attracted to. Charming, funny, relaxed. Then a gorgeous woman looked my way and I'd become a sweating, babbling mess.
The fix took me years to find and ten minutes to learn. Nervousness and excitement are the same physical state — pounding heart, adrenaline, flushed face. Your brain just picks the label. And you can pick a better one.
Rule 16 shows you how. You feel the nerves, relabel them as excitement, and let that energy pour out as enthusiasm. Women notice the guy radiating it. They always do.
Exactly,squirrels said:"Emotional Intelligence" is an oxymoron. Just another term women fabricate to make it look like they're not stupid.
"Oh, women aren't as smart as men generally, but they have 'emotional intelligence'". Please.
I don't know why women make excuses for themselves instead of using the gifts they naturally DO have.
jafyk said:Dang! Warrior sometimes you come across as so closed minded. Personally, I think a lot of problems we have stem from people not being in touch with themselves (that would also include male-male and male-female relationships). Your attitude towards this EQ idea is one of such. You say people can learn this stuff at home right? Did you figure out all you needed to know about women and dating at home? hence sosuave and similar sites and books. I feel the EQ idea is good but your fears that such a noble idea might be perveted is understandable. Still when one is thought something one still has a choice to apply what they've been taught. In the end they are informed about something. After learning so much from sosuave if I was in the education system. I'd require them to have a dating class. Because everything we do as human beings deals with relationship and these are important things you don't learn at home.
so being social is the same as having a high intelligence? or vice versa?squirrels said:"Emotional Intelligence" is an oxymoron. Just another term women fabricate to make it look like they're not stupid.
"Oh, women aren't as smart as men generally, but they have 'emotional intelligence'". Please.
I don't know why women make excuses for themselves instead of using the gifts they naturally DO have.