Hello Friend,

If this is your first visit to SoSuave, I would advise you to START HERE.

It will be the most efficient use of your time.

And you will learn everything you need to know to become a huge success with women.

Thank you for visiting and have a great day!

Blue Pilled Women?

Lynx nkaf

Master Don Juan
Joined
Nov 17, 2019
Messages
2,045
Reaction score
1,308
'' 1. She doesn't understand men are only as fateful as our options. ''

I don't think that really applies to men the same way as it applies to women. Men might be not so fateful if they have many options but men only wouldn't be faithful physically. I mean having sex with another person doesn't mean emotional bonding for us. It's just that we have 10-17 x more testosterone and we are programmed to fck as many women as we can.
We still go home and love our wifes/gfs we know for 2/5/10 years and we don't give a fck about the slvt we bang on the side. We value our family and unity.

Women on the other side emotionally disconnect when they fck other guys while in a marriage or ltr. She fcks him because she feels like he's an upgrade and most times they have one side dude not multiple ones.
It's not only about the sex for them. If she desires another man or fcks him it's the beginning of the end while for him it's all the time this way. He ALWAYS desires to fck other girls. But he is also able to love his girl like a relative not so a woman.

She also makes a conscious decision to fck another man because she never has the same level of sexual desire like a man. We are almost constantly horny and feel the urge to fck.
Yes, you speak the truth.

I feel scared that mens' lowered testosterone levels are by design and on purpose to make them agreeable to being loyal sexually to one woman.

Making 'eunuchs' out of men.

It would be interesting to start tracking women's testosterone levels.
Maybe the levels are so much closer on average to men's levels and that maybe men on average, are only 2 or 3X higher in test. than women now. No longer 10 to 17X higher. That would be spooky to know for sure.

That would also account for how women are quick to cheat and discard for the next lay now.
 

mrgoodstuff

Master Don Juan
Joined
Aug 27, 2015
Messages
15,424
Reaction score
9,848
Location
DFW, TX
Ya! I was going to write that too but I didn't know what to replace 'chump' with. 'Chic' still seems too cute-sy of a word and not idiot-sounding enough.
Guys who are in the "know" call these females "chumps" or "fags"... They know they are "stupid" to someone. It ain't everyone, it ain't most, but theres that one guy she's a "chump" for.
 

mrgoodstuff

Master Don Juan
Joined
Aug 27, 2015
Messages
15,424
Reaction score
9,848
Location
DFW, TX
Yes, you speak the truth.

I feel scared that mens' lowered testosterone levels are by design and on purpose to make them agreeable to being loyal sexually to one woman.

Making 'eunuchs' out of men.

It would be interesting to start tracking women's testosterone levels.
Maybe the levels are so much closer on average to men's levels and that maybe men on average, are only 2 or 3X higher in test. than women now. No longer 10 to 17X higher. That would be spooky to know for sure.

That would also account for how women are quick to cheat and discard for the next lay now.
That's exactly why they are cheating on men now. If a woman cucks a man, his testosterone decreases, her's increases as long as she has him cucked. If the cuck releases from her, her testosterone will drop, unless she gets a new cuck. It's the remaining in alignment, that allows her test to be forced up. The men that the lady fvcks, she doesn't cuck them, they get to benefit.
 

Lynx nkaf

Master Don Juan
Joined
Nov 17, 2019
Messages
2,045
Reaction score
1,308
I've actually heard them called "chump". So that same female thinks there always has to be a "fool". She'll make the guys that really like her a "sucker," because she knows for the guys she thinks are all that she's their "sucker". Drake just said "all the good women are in relationships "
I'll agree with Drake and admit if I had been more of a good woman I would have still been attracted to my ex. There's lots of little things I did that I was reminded of by reading the stories here, that I could have done differently in my last relationship.

I'm still not sure how I could have convinced myself I was still attracted to him though.

Some lines were crossed that were outside my moral comfort zone.
 

mrgoodstuff

Master Don Juan
Joined
Aug 27, 2015
Messages
15,424
Reaction score
9,848
Location
DFW, TX
I'll agree with Drake and admit if I had been more of a good woman I would have still been attracted to my ex. There's lots of little things I did that I was reminded of by reading the stories here, that I could have done differently in my last relationship.

I'm still not sure how I could have convinced myself I was still attracted to him though.

Some lines were crossed that were outside my moral comfort zone.
Fvck that guy, he needed you to disrespect yourself to be with him.
 

image

"If you love women, you must read the SoSuave Guide to Women. It's fantastic!"

TheFinalLine

Master Don Juan
Joined
Aug 24, 2020
Messages
704
Reaction score
597
Age
57
I feel scared that mens' lowered testosterone levels are by design and on purpose to make them agreeable to being loyal sexually to one woman.

Making 'eunuchs' out of men.
close. Not bad actually. The idea is to keep men under wraps so women can execute their lovers on the side imperative.

A man with low T will do anything to keep the woman he is attached to. He is more socially agreeable. He is less likely to revolt. More likely to go into agreement with the sexual strategy of women.

I read an extensive article on how the Roman Empire pacified the provinces. They introduced agriculture.
Grains have a molecular construction similar to opioids. Opium.
Grains will activate the same receptors as opium. This is a medical fact. Any argument is useless.

We can take wheat. It literally turns into an opioid as soon as it hits stomach acids. This makes men lethargic and fat. And women REALLY fat and useless.
The Roman doctrine was to get the province “tribes” off of hunter/gatherer diets and into grains. This is a historical fact and a vital part of Roman doctrine. Fully documented. The purpose was to make people lethargic and functionally unlikely to revolt. This is science.
 

Lynx nkaf

Master Don Juan
Joined
Nov 17, 2019
Messages
2,045
Reaction score
1,308
Guys who are in the "know" call these females "chumps" or "fags"... They know they are "stupid" to someone. It ain't everyone, it ain't most, but theres that one guy she's a "chump" for.
I think that guy my ex called an orbiter saw me as that. It was hard for me to accept he was an orbiter when I had no attraction, no 'use' for him.
It was hard not to respond to him when I had nothing else going on.(loneliness factor)
My ex said he was playing me like a puppeteer plays his puppets.(never slept with him so how could I be played? and how could I be playing him when I would never sleep with him?) I never texted or emailed him first, but I admit what made me a poor quality woman was that I responded in one of the periods I didn't see my ex for 6 or 7 weeks. There was a couple of periods like that in the 14 months.
Long distance relationships where only the girl is driving to the guy gets old real fast.

I was my ex's chump was what I was.

Him teaching me red pill stuff was actually a parting gift.
Completely severed with him but luckily, it also worked to completely sever ties to that puppeteer.
 
Last edited:

Lynx nkaf

Master Don Juan
Joined
Nov 17, 2019
Messages
2,045
Reaction score
1,308
Fvck that guy, he needed you to disrespect yourself to be with him.
thanks my dear brother. I really want your success in your life. I'm grateful you helped me so much this year on here. My word, I'll never forget your kind words.
 

mrgoodstuff

Master Don Juan
Joined
Aug 27, 2015
Messages
15,424
Reaction score
9,848
Location
DFW, TX
I think that guy my ex called an orbiter saw me as that. It was hard for me to accept he was an orbiter when I had no attraction, no 'use' for him.
It was hard not to respond to him when I had nothing else going on.(loneliness factor)
My ex said he was playing me like a puppeteer plays his puppets.(never slept with him so how could I be played? how could I be playing him when I would never sleep with him? I never texted or emailed him first but I admit what made me a poor quality woman was that I responded in one of the periods I didn't see my ex for 6 or 7 weeks.
Long distance relationships where only the girl is driving to the guy gets old real fast.
Narcisissts do most people that way. I guarantee having you in his lineup raised his confidence to monstrous levels.

I was my ex's chump was what I was.

Him teaching me red pill stuff was actually a parting gift.
Completely severed with him but luckily, it also worked to completely sever ties to that puppeteer.
You have to apply it in a feminine way. So know your worth. Have your female sexuality and charm mastered, and don't get played again
If you will have a man in the future what are your boundaries? What do you need from that man? What are you willing to give to that man?
 

Lynx nkaf

Master Don Juan
Joined
Nov 17, 2019
Messages
2,045
Reaction score
1,308
Narcisissts do most people that way. I guarantee having you in his lineup raised his confidence to monstrous levels.



You have to apply it in a feminine way. So know your worth. Have your female sexuality and charm mastered, and don't get played again
If you will have a man in the future what are your boundaries? What do you need from that man? What are you willing to give to that man?
I'll just pay a stripper or pornstar if I need intimacy.





There is no elevated man that can meet my loyalty standards and still stay high testosterone.

No man's *Will* is stronger than his testosterone.

The hormone testosterone wins out over selfregulation, male or female, every time.

And I still encourage men to raise their testosterone levels. I am selfless and still want their happiness.

I really feel like I've learned everything there is to learn about this. My conclusion is just to exchange my money for their sex when I need it.

Never say 'I love you' again, only say 'I trade you', from now on.(got that idea from another sosuave member)

Amazing I deduced all this with a low notch count hey?
Its because I thoroughly think about each relationship ending and research what I don't know enough about and meditate deeply on my lessons I absorbed.
 

mrgoodstuff

Master Don Juan
Joined
Aug 27, 2015
Messages
15,424
Reaction score
9,848
Location
DFW, TX
I'll just pay a stripper or pornstar if I need intimacy.





There is no elevated man that can meet my loyalty standards and still stay high testosterone.

No man's *Will* is stronger than his testosterone.

The hormone testosterone wins out over selfregulation, male or female, every time.

And I still encourage men to raise their testosterone levels. I am selfless and still want their happiness.

I really feel like I've learned everything there is to learn about this. My conclusion is just to exchange my money for their sex when I need it.

Never say 'I love you' again, only say 'I trade you', from now on.(got that idea from another sosuave member)

Amazing I deduced all this with a low notch count hey?
Its because I thoroughly think about each relationship ending and research what I don't know enough about and meditate deeply on my lessons I absorbed.
Martial Artist/Actor Michael Jae White just turned down several Hollywood celebs. They said he was "happy and stupid "... He didn't care. He has the wife he wanted.

So if a man's fvcking he doesn't necessarily need to fvck everything.

Plus at his level of masculinity laying with them would decrease his self worth. You see they don't control him. He's on control that's why he turned them down.
 

Lynx nkaf

Master Don Juan
Joined
Nov 17, 2019
Messages
2,045
Reaction score
1,308
So if a man's fvcking he doesn't necessarily need to fvck everything , until he does.
fixed it for you;)
It simply hasn't happened yet.
We talk in absolutes here on sosuave right? The exception is never the rule and All Men Are Like That or AMALT, just like the AWALT term.

I predict it will happen when his smv begins dropping due to age or illness. You yourself write over and over how fvcking a new babe increases your looks.
 

mrgoodstuff

Master Don Juan
Joined
Aug 27, 2015
Messages
15,424
Reaction score
9,848
Location
DFW, TX
fixed it for you;)
It simply hasn't happened yet.
We talk in absolutes here on sosuave right? The exception is never the rule and All Men Are Like That or AMALT, just like the AWALT term.

I predict it will happen when his smv begins dropping due to age or illness. You yourself write over and over how fvcking a new babe increases your looks.
His choice was to not be easy. You have that choice.
 

TheFinalLine

Master Don Juan
Joined
Aug 24, 2020
Messages
704
Reaction score
597
Age
57
fixed it for you;)
It simply hasn't happened yet.
We talk in absolutes here on sosuave right? The exception is never the rule and All Men Are Like That or AMALT, just like the AWALT term.

I predict it will happen when his smv begins dropping due to age or illness. You yourself write over and over how fvcking a new babe increases your looks.
there is a massive caveat. In fact, it is mostly incorrect.

Men want offspring and children and a family. It is this biological phenomena that is exploited. Why do men naturally protect women and the innocent?

It’s hard wired. A biological adaptation. I disagree with the assumption that men want to spread their seed. This is all over the RPworld. It’s false data. Men cannot be wired to protect and serve (which they are) and STILL want to mass spread their seed.

This is a result of scientists trying to bring in studies of primates, to humans. This needs to be ruthlessly challenged.

When a man becomes attached to a woman, he immediately start building “his world”. Except now, it is a family which pushes the next generation into the future. He ensures they survive.
What causes a man to drop his wife seed spreading is that now he has directed his energy and resources towards protection and this j clauses the ever present mate guarding. This is a huge cloud over his head. UNLESS he is being programmed in this fashion....

“you are insecure”, “you are invading my privacy.” “Insecure men are everywhere”, “men have such weak egos”, “the men in my past were abusive!!!”

there are hundreds of them. If I said right now in this forum...no social media, no goes nights out, no revealing immodest clothes to work, etc. the programmed men on here would blow a gasket on this thread.

These are actions that prevent a woman from participating in activities that promote infidelity.
All the above statements and nearly all the so called “abuse claims” are the result of mate guarding and preventing children that aren’t his. This is biological.

Now take these facts and compare it to “men are biologically wired to spread their seed”.

either one is wrong or both are are wrong. Occam's razor.

Now if you said that there are two types of biological gene assemblies and one is the breeder and all the rest are the cuckolds...you would at least be partially correct.
 

TheFinalLine

Master Don Juan
Joined
Aug 24, 2020
Messages
704
Reaction score
597
Age
57
there is a massive caveat. In fact, it is mostly incorrect.

Men want offspring and children and a family. It is this biological phenomena that is exploited. Why do men naturally protect women and the innocent?

It’s hard wired. A biological adaptation. I disagree with the assumption that men want to spread their seed. This is all over the RPworld. It’s false data. Men cannot be wired to protect and serve (which they are) and STILL want to mass spread their seed.

This is a result of scientists trying to bring in studies of primates, to humans. This needs to be ruthlessly challenged.

When a man becomes attached to a woman, he immediately start building “his world”. Except now, it is a family which pushes the next generation into the future. He ensures they survive.
What causes a man to drop his seed spreading is that now he has directed his energy and resources towards protection and this j clauses the ever present mate guarding. This is a huge cloud over his head. UNLESS he is being programmed in this fashion....

“you are insecure”, “you are invading my privacy.” “Insecure men are everywhere”, “men have such weak egos”, “the men in my past were abusive!!!”

there are hundreds of them. If I said right now in this forum...no social media, no goes nights out, no revealing immodest clothes to work, etc. the programmed men on here would blow a gasket on this thread.

These are actions that prevent a woman from participating in activities that promote infidelity.
All the above statements and nearly all the so called “abuse claims” are the result of mate guarding and preventing children that aren’t his. This is biological.

Now take these facts and compare it to “men are biologically wired to spread their seed”.

either one is wrong or both are are wrong. Occam's razor.

Now if you said that there are two types of biological gene assemblies and one is the breeder and all the rest are the cuckolds...you would at least be partially correct.
 

image

Put away your credit card.

You can now read our detailed guide to women and dating for free - Right Here!

mrgoodstuff

Master Don Juan
Joined
Aug 27, 2015
Messages
15,424
Reaction score
9,848
Location
DFW, TX
there is a massive caveat. In fact, it is mostly incorrect.

Men want offspring and children and a family. It is this biological phenomena that is exploited. Why do men naturally protect women and the innocent?

It’s hard wired. A biological adaptation. I disagree with the assumption that men want to spread their seed. This is all over the RPworld. It’s false data. Men cannot be wired to protect and serve (which they are) and STILL want to mass spread their seed.

This is a result of scientists trying to bring in studies of primates, to humans. This needs to be ruthlessly challenged.

When a man becomes attached to a woman, he immediately start building “his world”. Except now, it is a family which pushes the next generation into the future. He ensures they survive.
What causes a man to drop his wife seed spreading is that now he has directed his energy and resources towards protection and this j clauses the ever present mate guarding. This is a huge cloud over his head. UNLESS he is being programmed in this fashion....

“you are insecure”, “you are invading my privacy.” “Insecure men are everywhere”, “men have such weak egos”, “the men in my past were abusive!!!”

there are hundreds of them. If I said right now in this forum...no social media, no goes nights out, no revealing immodest clothes to work, etc. the programmed men on here would blow a gasket on this thread.

These are actions that prevent a woman from participating in activities that promote infidelity.
All the above statements and nearly all the so called “abuse claims” are the result of mate guarding and preventing children that aren’t his. This is biological.

Now take these facts and compare it to “men are biologically wired to spread their seed”.

either one is wrong or both are are wrong. Occam's razor.

Now if you said that there are two types of biological gene assemblies and one is the breeder and all the rest are the cuckolds...you would at least be partially correct.
The men who defend are blind cucks. There are also alphas who defend because they benefit.
 

TheFinalLine

Master Don Juan
Joined
Aug 24, 2020
Messages
704
Reaction score
597
Age
57
there is a massive caveat. In fact, it is mostly incorrect.

Men want offspring and children and a family. It is this biological phenomena that is exploited. Why do men naturally protect women and the innocent?

It’s hard wired. A biological adaptation. I disagree with the assumption that men want to spread their seed. This is all over the RPworld. It’s false data. Men cannot be wired to protect and serve (which they are) and STILL want to mass spread their seed.

This is a result of scientists trying to bring in studies of primates, to humans. This needs to be ruthlessly challenged.

When a man becomes attached to a woman, he immediately start building “his world”. Except now, it is a family which pushes the next generation into the future. He ensures they survive.
What causes a man to drop his wife seed spreading is that now he has directed his energy and resources towards protection and this j clauses the ever present mate guarding. This is a huge cloud over his head. UNLESS he is being programmed in this fashion....

“you are insecure”, “you are invading my privacy.” “Insecure men are everywhere”, “men have such weak egos”, “the men in my past were abusive!!!”

there are hundreds of them. If I said right now in this forum...no social media, no goes nights out, no revealing immodest clothes to work, etc. the programmed men on here would blow a gasket on this thread.

These are actions that prevent a woman from participating in activities that promote infidelity.
All the above statements and nearly all the so called “abuse claims” are the result of mate guarding and preventing children that aren’t his. This is biological.

Now take these facts and compare it to “men are biologically wired to spread their seed”.

either one is wrong or both are are wrong. Occam's razor.

Now if you said that there are two types of biological gene assemblies and one is the breeder and all the rest are the cuckolds...you would at least be partially correct.
The men who defend are blind cucks. There are also alphas who defend because they benefit.
if this be so biologically. Then all men are not alike.
An “Alpha” would be the exception and not the rule.
This is social conditioning aside and looking only at biology.
There are some bad arse “Alphas” getting divorced raped or cuckolded as we speak...because all women are like that.

If we apply a standard to women, then we must also assume a standard biological response to men. Which is it? Spread seed or protect his family? Protecting family would absolutely require mate guarding.
 

mrgoodstuff

Master Don Juan
Joined
Aug 27, 2015
Messages
15,424
Reaction score
9,848
Location
DFW, TX
if this be so biologically. Then all men are not alike.
An “Alpha” would be the exception and not the rule.
This is social conditioning aside and looking only at biology.
There are some bad arse “Alphas” getting divorced raped or cuckolded as we speak...because all women are like that.

If we apply a standard to women, then we must also assume a standard biological response to men. Which is it? Spread seed or protect his family? Protecting family would absolutely require mate guarding.
There's a system in place.
 

Lynx nkaf

Master Don Juan
Joined
Nov 17, 2019
Messages
2,045
Reaction score
1,308
when watching the AMS video that the OP posted there's a part in it where he gestures down to his genitalia making female half whimper/half grunt noises as if to demonstrate a female that is "throwing puzzy" at a man and the fact that no man, even a disciplined man such as martial artist Michael from mrgoodstuff's example in a previous post can resist.

AMALT. No man turns down free, thrown-at-him puzzy forever. Even the betas.
 

mrgoodstuff

Master Don Juan
Joined
Aug 27, 2015
Messages
15,424
Reaction score
9,848
Location
DFW, TX
when watching the AMS video that the OP posted there's a part in it where he gestures down to his genitalia making female half whimper/half grunt noises as if to demonstrate a female that is "throwing being puzzy" at a man and the fact that no man, even a disciplined man such as martial artist Michael from mrgoodstuff's example in a previous post can resist.

AMALT. No man turns down free, thrown-at-him puzzy forever. Even the betas.
Not true.... If he knows he can fvvk who he wants then most end up being pvssy he doesn't want.
 
Top