Banned in Loveshack.org

[Robert28]

Lol @HankHill he's married so that's a no go.

I did clear my throat and say "you need to move so that I can actually get to my keyboard....' and he moved but he'll still invade my space when he comes over. Lol

He's harmless but I can tell he's crushing on the pretty, extroverted, software engineer that seems to know her $hit. It happens, the stories I could tell, lol

Is he one of those close talkers?lol

 

[Mike32ct]

If you know him well, you could just quietly and jokingly say, “Could you move over a bit? I need my three-foot radius lol.”

 

[redskinsfan92]

Those beetches banned you guys quickly and y'all have allowed me to stick around here for so long....

It's settled, you guys are swell!

I checked out the site before. I don't have time for the whiny females who make the exact same set of mistakes over and over and over, expecting it will be different this time. It makes me want to pull my long, soft, excellent smelling hair out of my head.

Hey, since I can't ask on loveshack.....what would you do if a co worker always invaded your personal space at your desk? Aka he sits SO close that you can't use one arm or your going to touch him/his arm, shoulder or body....? It's clearly deliberate, lol

I think he likes you.

 

[Bokanovsky]

He's harmless but I can tell he's crushing on the pretty, extroverted, software engineer that seems to know her $hit. It happens, the stories I could tell, lol

Try being less "extroverted" (i.e. less of a flirt). Works like a charm.

 

[Spaz]

Most of the posters/moderators on LS are middle-aged women. You are getting advice from middle-aged divorcees, men too, on how to attract, court, and handle breakups "pursue them and let them know how much you care" etc. It's typically extremely poor and even harmful advice.

I wouldn't say they are militant feminists, however. They are just middle-aged women who were likely not very attractive as younger women and probably have only had experiences dating low SMV men. They advise and opine accordingly.

I believe it's possible to be red pill aware, and understand how attraction and female emotion works, while not being angry about it. A lot of red pill MGTOW 'truth' reeks of bitterness and resentment and it's not always appropriate in a forum where women go to cry over being dumped for a hotter girl.

I do agree that "red pill" has pushed some men to the far side, into extremism, as with any ideology.

Men should not allow themselves to be tied down with 1 particular linear line of thought.

Red pill is not an equation that requires linear thinking.

 

[Epic Days]

View attachment 2978

That site is ran by women.

I pretty much know why this happens. There are bunch of women and when you write something that is not inline with beta thought, you get reported. Plus moderator is a woman. So in fact on that site you getting advice from women on how to properly date women.

Guys on there would have zero chance.

 

[Epic Days]

I do agree that "red pill" has pushed some men to the far side, into extremism, as with any ideology.

Men should not allow themselves to be tied down with 1 particular linear line of thought.

Red pill is not an equation that requires linear thinking.

It requires conceptual thinking. It stunts creativity. I think of the whole genre as a concept. A playground.

 

[Spaz]

It requires conceptual thinking. It stunts creativity. I think of the whole genre as a concept. A playground.

As it should be.

 

[rjc149]

I do agree that "red pill" has pushed some men to the far side, into extremism, as with any ideology.

Men should not allow themselves to be tied down with 1 particular linear line of thought.

Red pill is not an equation that requires linear thinking.

To me the red pill is merely a necessary perspective for wholistic understanding, a cornerstone, not the arch. Going anywhere to preach single-minded Rollo Tomassi gospel to validate misogynist incel butthurt is going to come off as pathetic and irritate people. Reading through some threads there it doesn’t appear that LS is totalitarian blue pill, it’s just trying to offer comfort for grieving people, some of whom have been truly fvcked over, without any Tomassi-inspired misogyny. It’s a bad resource for dating and relationship advice, however, especially for men.

Once I became “red pill aware” it was a formula I followed rigidly, trying to totally shed my blue pill conditioning. I soon learned through heartbreak that women simply don’t put up with rigid formulaic “alpha” behavior any longer than they put up with weak submissive beta behavior. But I believe men need to know the extremes before they can calibrate properly.

 

[redskinsfan92]

To me the red pill is merely a necessary perspective for wholistic understanding, a cornerstone, not the arch. Going anywhere to preach single-minded Rollo Tomassi gospel to validate misogynist incel butthurt is going to come off as pathetic and irritate people. Reading through some threads there it doesn’t appear that LS is totalitarian blue pill, it’s just trying to offer comfort for grieving people, some of whom have been truly fvcked over, without any Tomassi-inspired misogyny. It’s a bad resource for dating and relationship advice, however, especially for men.

Once I became “red pill aware” it was a formula I followed rigidly, trying to totally shed my blue pill conditioning. I soon learned through heartbreak that women simply don’t put up with rigid formulaic “alpha” behavior any longer than they put up with weak submissive beta behavior. But I believe men need to know the extremes before they can calibrate properly.

Rollo is no misogynist. He doesn't teach a formula. His books clearly state he doesn't offer a prescription.

 

[Epic Days]

Rollo is no misogynist. He doesn't teach a formula. His books clearly state he doesn't offer a prescription.

This is true. He doesn’t. When someone says something like that, you can be assured that they haven’t read much of him.

That being said, Rollo is a passive. Creative and his stuff is a great introduction into this world.

 

[rjc149]

Rollo is no misogynist. He doesn't teach a formula. His books clearly state he doesn't offer a prescription.

The formula I was referring to was a general attitude toward women and dating embodied by Alpha Male Strategies “never give women anything” etc. not necessarily Rollo Tomassi.

If Rollo Tomassi is not a misogynist, that isn’t clarified in his book. His tendency to rob women of individuality and agency and paint it all under the broad stroke “female imperative” brush, his bitter fixation on female hypergamy, his general portrayal of women as enemy automatons and men as hapless victims of their manipulation, and the overall indignant, angry tone throughout the book would indicate the guy has a problem with women. At least, he seems to have little love or affection for them.

I still consider it essential reading to gain that perspective and awareness. But it shouldn’t be seen as gospel.

 

[Epic Days]

If Rollo Tomassi is not a misogynist, that isn’t clarified in his book. His tendency to rob women of individuality and agency and paint it all under the broad stroke “female imperative” brush, his bitter fixation on female hypergamy, his general portrayal of women as enemy automatons and men as hapless victims of their manipulation, and the overall indignant, angry tone throughout the book would indicate the guy has a problem with women. At least, he seems to have little love or affection for them.

Ok. This section right here.
There’s where you are proving that you haven’t read it from cover to cover. All of those things are observable to any non-retard observation.

IF you have read it cover to cover, you need to think about not spouting feminist and social conditioning phrases. It’s a dead giveaway. Your true stripes are showing.

 

[rjc149]

Ok. This section right here.
There’s where you are proving that you haven’t read it from cover to cover. All of those things are observable to any non-retard observation.

IF you have read it cover to cover, you need to think about not spouting feminist and social conditioning phrases. It’s a dead giveaway. Your true stripes are showing.

I am challenging you red pill totalitarian ideology, which you don’t like. You label my dissent with epithets denoting that I am an extremist feminist threat. I get how that works. People don’t like dissent.

That you recognized his misogynistic bent is readily observed by any layman would prove my point, no? Would requiring someone to read the book cover to cover offer any opposing insight?

 

[Epic Days]

I am challenging you red pill totalitarian ideology, which you don’t like.

Not challenging anything. Hahaha I’m not in the Imperative. My vision is pan determined. Not ideological. In fact Rollo is a primer for fundamental understanding of observable female nature. Not a Bible. Only a leftist or a woman would say he is those things. Especially since he’s married and has a grown daughter. For good or bad he made it work.

If you want the real deal, read “The Manipulated Man”. The straight up perspective on women by a woman. It’s too advanced for guys just unplugging from the social structure.

 

[Spaz]

Too bad I haven't even finish reading the Rational Male nor watched any of AMS materials, can't join in the discussions gents.

 

[rjc149]

Not challenging anything. Hahaha I’m not in the Imperative. My vision is pan determined. Not ideological. In fact Rollo is a primer for fundamental understanding of observable female nature. Not a Bible. Only a leftist or a woman would say he is those things. Especially since he’s married and has a grown daughter. For good or bad he made it work.

If you want the real deal, read “The Manipulated Man”. The straight up perspective on women by a woman. It’s too advanced for guys just unplugging from the social structure.

Read my earlier posts.

"To me the red pill is merely a necessary perspective for wholistic understanding, a cornerstone, not the arch."

"I still consider it essential reading to gain that perspective and awareness. "

So what's your problem?

 

[rjc149]

Sort of like how a 'nice guy' over-calibrates by being an a$$hole, so he can get comfortable with being selfish, with peer disapproval, with not giving a fvck, before re-calibrating somewhere back to the middle and becoming a truly attractive man. Men detoxing from the blue pill need to go red pill to understand that perspective of the truth, but need to re-calibrate back to the middle in order to become complete men. Rollo Tomassi is a splash of reality for blue pill men but does not present a balanced, fair viewpoint on women. That's my point.

 

[Epic Days]

Read my earlier posts.

"To me the red pill is merely a necessary perspective for wholistic understanding, a cornerstone, not the arch."

"I still consider it essential reading to gain that perspective and awareness. "

So what's your problem?

I thought it was self evident. Never mind.

 

[rjc149]

In fact Rollo is a primer for fundamental understanding of observable female nature. Not a Bible.

We're clearly in agreement, so I'm just wondering what your "spouting feminist and social conditioning phrases" beef with me is. Because I don't like the book you like? I'll chalk it up to knee-jerk reaction.