article: Is Prostitution Just Another Job?

[MatureDJ]

https://www.thecut.com/2016/03/sex-workers-legalization-c-v-r.html

 

[Skyline]

Escorting should be legal in the states.

The average customer is literally the average person. The only reason why human trafficking is popular is because it sells to the average person.

The animal will always follow the food...

 

[skinnyguy]

I’ve never figured out how women bang fat hairy guys on the reg. I guess the money is that appealing

 

[Serenity]

Men should start valuing themselves and their sexuality more, currently it seems to have generally negative value (pays to fvck). Women have d!cks thrown at them all over the place, not only are we giving it freely, we pay to give it.

If d!ck were to become more scarce the tables would turn or at least it would reach equilibrium. It's not that women don't enjoy sex, it's just that it's so easy to get d!ck as it's just offered to them everywhere, they can choose whichever and plenty of guys will offer money along with it.

Who of you would say no if you were to easily be offered pvssy along with money? Not many I suppose.

I wonder if (apart from trafficking) the real issue is misplaced? It's the guys who value their sexuality so little it is less than worthless and pay to fvck that may be the actual issue here.

 

[Who Dares Win]

Prostitution even if legal and taxed wont provide the government and the general economy as much revenue as plain dating and marriage.

With an escort you spend 100 euros of which less than 20% are taxed, with a date you pay dinner for two, drinks for two and two cinema tickets plus the fuel and the parking space.

Also an escort twice a month will be enough to make the average man satisfied enough not to look for LTRs at current conditions, he will still keep his money and apart taxation the gov wont have ways to grab them.

 

[MatureDJ]

Men should start valuing themselves and their sexuality more, currently it seems to have generally negative value (pays to fvck). Women have d!cks thrown at them all over the place, not only are we giving it freely, we pay to give it.

If d!ck were to become more scarce the tables would turn or at least it would reach equilibrium. It's not that women don't enjoy sex, it's just that it's so easy to get d!ck as it's just offered to them everywhere, they can choose whichever and plenty of guys will offer money along with it.

Who of you would say no if you were to easily be offered pvssy along with money? Not many I suppose.

I wonder if (apart from trafficking) the real issue is misplaced? It's the guys who value their sexuality so little it is less than worthless and pay to fvck that may be the actual issue here.

You bring up a good point, and it is the same problem that the members of OPEC & Russia have in trying to get the price of oil up: who are going to be the ones that will withdraw the pen!s to modulate the market price? And no, I am not talking about the MGTOW incellers.

 

[corrector]

Men should start valuing themselves and their sexuality more, currently it seems to have generally negative value (pays to fvck). Women have d!cks thrown at them all over the place, not only are we giving it freely, we pay to give it.

How can you compare "civvy" women to pros? These women are seeing a number of men in a day who don't really respect them and were probably molested (in most cases) as children. A "civvy", and I mean a normal women, may have had countable number.

If d!ck were to become more scarce the tables would turn or at least it would reach equilibrium. It's not that women don't enjoy sex, it's just that it's so easy to get d!ck as it's just offered to them everywhere, they can choose whichever and plenty of guys will offer money along with it.

You are assuming that pros actually enjoy sex with their clients, and are just charging money for it?

Who of you would say no if you were to easily be offered pvssy along with money? Not many I suppose.

I would for one, but of course, money is not my god. There are male escorts too that sell themselves to business women, or gigolos?

I wonder if (apart from trafficking) the real issue is misplaced? It's the guys who value their sexuality so little it is less than worthless and pay to fvck that may be the actual issue here.

I don't think that paying for a fvck is any worst than renting a movie vs borrowing it from the library for free. That is, if sex is wrong in principle, then whether you pay for it or not doesn't make it any more or less a sin. It's still a sin because you are not married to the woman and you are not right with God (whether or not you believe He exists is irrelevant to Him when He judges you). The real question, is it wrong to pay your own wife for sex like a pro if a couple is into kinky stuff? That would be an interesting moral question. If watching a movie is wrong to a person (i.e. either they don't like the movie, or they feel that watching a movie is a sin, or a waste of time), then does it matter if you pay to rent it or go to the library and borrow it for free?