MatureDJ
Master Don Juan
- Joined
- Apr 30, 2006
- Messages
- 12,716
- Reaction score
- 5,137
Attraction runs on a clock.
She flirted for weeks. Touched your arm. Found reasons to be alone with you. And you were careful. Respectful. Waiting for the right moment.
The moment had a shelf life. It expired around month two, and by the time you asked her out, she'd quietly filed you under "little brother."
One of the hardest lessons inside the 22 Rules: women rarely wait. Interest either grows or it decays, and nothing decays it faster than a man who never moves.
Make the move while she's still inventing reasons to be near you.
You paid for dinner. You drove. You said "whatever you want is fine" every single time. All the effort, no expectations.
And she left anyway — probably for a guy who makes her pick up the pizza.
Painful. Also predictable. Her mind quietly concludes that anything requiring zero effort from her is worth exactly zero. You became a free sample, and free samples get taken for granted.
The 22 Rules flip the dynamic. Small shifts that get her investing effort, money, and time in you — until SHE'S the one afraid of losing YOU.
Forget the cash, the cars, and the chiseled jawlines. Female desire operates on a completely different frequency. Primal. Subconscious. Triggers that bypass her logic and hit her on a gut level. Most guys are totally blind to them.
I know because I was one of them. The overthinking. The paralysis. The silent drive home kicking yourself for freezing up. Watching average guys walk away with the girl while you stood there stuck in your own head.
Then I decoded the psychology behind what actually makes women tick. 22 hard rules. Subtle behavioral shifts that rewired my entire reality. The anxiety evaporated. Women started leaning in. Investing. Chasing.
You bring up a good point, and it is the same problem that the members of OPEC & Russia have in trying to get the price of oil up: who are going to be the ones that will withdraw the pen!s to modulate the market price? And no, I am not talking about the MGTOW incellers.Men should start valuing themselves and their sexuality more, currently it seems to have generally negative value (pays to fvck). Women have d!cks thrown at them all over the place, not only are we giving it freely, we pay to give it.
If d!ck were to become more scarce the tables would turn or at least it would reach equilibrium. It's not that women don't enjoy sex, it's just that it's so easy to get d!ck as it's just offered to them everywhere, they can choose whichever and plenty of guys will offer money along with it.
Who of you would say no if you were to easily be offered pvssy along with money? Not many I suppose.
I wonder if (apart from trafficking) the real issue is misplaced? It's the guys who value their sexuality so little it is less than worthless and pay to fvck that may be the actual issue here.
How can you compare "civvy" women to pros? These women are seeing a number of men in a day who don't really respect them and were probably molested (in most cases) as children. A "civvy", and I mean a normal women, may have had countable number.Men should start valuing themselves and their sexuality more, currently it seems to have generally negative value (pays to fvck). Women have d!cks thrown at them all over the place, not only are we giving it freely, we pay to give it.
You are assuming that pros actually enjoy sex with their clients, and are just charging money for it?Grewd said:If d!ck were to become more scarce the tables would turn or at least it would reach equilibrium. It's not that women don't enjoy sex, it's just that it's so easy to get d!ck as it's just offered to them everywhere, they can choose whichever and plenty of guys will offer money along with it.
I would for one, but of course, money is not my god. There are male escorts too that sell themselves to business women, or gigolos?Grewd said:Who of you would say no if you were to easily be offered pvssy along with money? Not many I suppose.
I don't think that paying for a fvck is any worst than renting a movie vs borrowing it from the library for free. That is, if sex is wrong in principle, then whether you pay for it or not doesn't make it any more or less a sin. It's still a sin because you are not married to the woman and you are not right with God (whether or not you believe He exists is irrelevant to Him when He judges you). The real question, is it wrong to pay your own wife for sex like a pro if a couple is into kinky stuff? That would be an interesting moral question. If watching a movie is wrong to a person (i.e. either they don't like the movie, or they feel that watching a movie is a sin, or a waste of time), then does it matter if you pay to rent it or go to the library and borrow it for free?Grewd said:I wonder if (apart from trafficking) the real issue is misplaced? It's the guys who value their sexuality so little it is less than worthless and pay to fvck that may be the actual issue here.