Personally I don't even believe 30% is an accurate number, because we already know that men exaggerate their sexual experience when they selfreport it, like when men and women say how many partners they've had. It's probably higher than 30%. And of those who have had sex, many probably just had it as a "nearcel": they got lucky a couple of times or something with a woman, but that's it - not reproducible. No regular sex. Or they had a woman they could have fvcked regularly but she was so unbearable or disgusting that they had to dump her and preferred to be celibate (that has been me).
Now for actually reading the article, I myself am more or less an anticapitalist sympathizer but that guy blames every human behavior on "capitalism". He also notes that 30% is more than 10%, but then in his writing he acts like men and women are incels in the same numbers. It's also funny when he says something like "the ones who aren't 6s and 7s on tinder don't get laid", which hows how clueless he is. If you are a male 6 or 7 you can't use tinder lol. He would know that if he had any clue. That and other things like the general way he writes, lead me to assume he just wrote the article or was assigned to write it like crappy clickbait rather than because he himself is informed. Then he goes on to say a 6 is hoping to match with a 10, but again doesn't specify gender, as if men there aren't getting laid because they just need to adjust who they swipe on and also as if women can't date up. I couldn't last reading the article longer than that, I find his writing to be sentimental and meandering like a histrionic woman writes which was irritating from the start.