“The 22 Psychological Triggers That Make Women Chase You… Starting Tonight”

Forget the cash, the cars, and the chiseled jawlines. Female desire operates on a completely different frequency. Primal. Subconscious. Triggers that bypass her logic and hit her on a gut level. Most guys are totally blind to them.

I know because I was one of them. The overthinking. The paralysis. The silent drive home kicking yourself for freezing up. Watching average guys walk away with the girl while you stood there stuck in your own head.

Then I decoded the psychology behind what actually makes women tick. 22 hard rules.  Subtle behavioral shifts that rewired my entire reality. The anxiety evaporated. Women started leaning in. Investing. Chasing.

Read more...

article: (How) Capitalism is Killing Human Intimacy - How Technology and Capital Killed Eros, By Turning Life Into a Contest for Self-Preservation

What happens, IN HER MIND, is that she comes to see you as WORTHLESS simply because she hasn't had to INVEST anything in you in order to get you or to keep you.

You were an interesting diversion while she had nothing else to do. But now that someone a little more valuable has come along, someone who expects her to treat him very well, she'll have no problem at all dropping you or demoting you to lowly "friendship" status.

Quote taken from The SoSuave Guide to Women and Dating, which you can read for FREE.

Who Dares Win

Master Don Juan
Joined
Jan 16, 2012
Messages
7,427
Reaction score
5,805
Someone please tell the guy that Europe works just like the Us currently, he also said he is european...right.

He may have a point anyway, a young person either cares about self preservation or reproduction because the first one prevents the second one when there is a real risk around.

Regarding the stats 30% of young guys aint getting laid against 10% of the girls gets translated as "young people aint getting laid", well in my opinion 1 out of 3 is different that 1 out of 10 but apparently he is too busy bashing capitalism to notice numbers.

My opinion is that young people (males especially) are not having sex cause they lack what it takes to attract others, in the current state of depressed economy for the first time we see people in their 20s getting paid less than their parents and their grandparents, many do not own a house or a stable job which is a huge problem for me seeking women.

At the same time women quality dropped to an all time low in human history while their demands reached the all times high, that explain while 30% of males aged 18-30 didnt have sex in the last year.

Cant really tell about that 10% of women in the same condition but I believe they must be ugly as fvck, feminist or some other uncurable disease.

We are all living in a rat utopia experiment on a bigger scale in my opinion except that the free food doesnt arrive.
 

AttackFormation

Master Don Juan
Joined
Apr 2, 2014
Messages
4,062
Reaction score
3,617
Age
33
Location
Sweden
Someone please tell the guy that Europe works just like the Us currently, he also said he is european...right.

He may have a point anyway, a young person either cares about self preservation or reproduction because the first one prevents the second one when there is a real risk around.

Regarding the stats 30% of young guys aint getting laid against 10% of the girls gets translated as "young people aint getting laid", well in my opinion 1 out of 3 is different that 1 out of 10 but apparently he is too busy bashing capitalism to notice numbers.

My opinion is that young people (males especially) are not having sex cause they lack what it takes to attract others, in the current state of depressed economy for the first time we see people in their 20s getting paid less than their parents and their grandparents, many do not own a house or a stable job which is a huge problem for me seeking women.

At the same time women quality dropped to an all time low in human history while their demands reached the all times high, that explain while 30% of males aged 18-30 didnt have sex in the last year.

Cant really tell about that 10% of women in the same condition but I believe they must be ugly as fvck, feminist or some other uncurable disease.

We are all living in a rat utopia experiment on a bigger scale in my opinion except that the free food doesnt arrive.
Personally I don't even believe 30% is an accurate number, because we already know that men exaggerate their sexual experience when they selfreport it, like when men and women say how many partners they've had. It's probably higher than 30%. And of those who have had sex, some probably just had it as a "nearcel": they got lucky a couple of times or something with a woman, but that's it - not reproducible. No regular sex. Or they had a woman they could have fvcked regularly but she was so unbearable or disgusting that they had to dump her and preferred to be celibate (that has been me).

Now for actually reading the article, I myself am more or less an anticapitalist sympathizer but that guy blames every human behavior on "capitalism". He also notes that 30% is more than 10%, but then in his writing he acts like men and women are incels in the same numbers. It's also funny when he says something like "the ones who aren't 6s and 7s on tinder don't get laid", which hows how clueless he is. If you are a male 6 or 7 you can't use tinder lol. He would know that if he had any clue. That and other things like the general way he writes, lead me to assume he just wrote the article or was assigned to write it like crappy clickbait rather than because he himself is informed. Then he goes on to say a 6 is hoping to match with a 10, but again doesn't specify gender, as if men there aren't getting laid because they just need to adjust who they swipe on and also as if women can't date up. I couldn't last reading the article longer than that, I find his writing to be sentimental and meandering like a histrionic woman writes which was irritating from the start.
 
Last edited:

Who Dares Win

Master Don Juan
Joined
Jan 16, 2012
Messages
7,427
Reaction score
5,805
Personally I don't even believe 30% is an accurate number, because we already know that men exaggerate their sexual experience when they selfreport it, like when men and women say how many partners they've had. It's probably higher than 30%. And of those who have had sex, many probably just had it as a "nearcel": they got lucky a couple of times or something with a woman, but that's it - not reproducible. No regular sex. Or they had a woman they could have fvcked regularly but she was so unbearable or disgusting that they had to dump her and preferred to be celibate (that has been me).

Now for actually reading the article, I myself am more or less an anticapitalist sympathizer but that guy blames every human behavior on "capitalism". He also notes that 30% is more than 10%, but then in his writing he acts like men and women are incels in the same numbers. It's also funny when he says something like "the ones who aren't 6s and 7s on tinder don't get laid", which hows how clueless he is. If you are a male 6 or 7 you can't use tinder lol. He would know that if he had any clue. That and other things like the general way he writes, lead me to assume he just wrote the article or was assigned to write it like crappy clickbait rather than because he himself is informed. Then he goes on to say a 6 is hoping to match with a 10, but again doesn't specify gender, as if men there aren't getting laid because they just need to adjust who they swipe on and also as if women can't date up. I couldn't last reading the article longer than that, I find his writing to be sentimental and meandering like a histrionic woman writes which was irritating from the start.
Good analysis, agree on that, he surely doesnt know what he is talking about regarding those dynamics.

A male 6 on tinder gets swiped left so much that at some point the algorithm no longer shows him to women let alone being succesful, maybe a male 7 can get a match here and there.
 

RickTheToad

Moderator
Joined
Apr 21, 2018
Messages
6,603
Reaction score
5,141
Location
Bridgeport, CT
Not sure I believe this. I mean, I'm a toad, and I've never had an issue attracting ladies for sex. However, I didn't say the feeling was mutual (me with them). So, if a toad can get sex, so can a regular dude.
 

Just because a woman listens to you and acts interested in what you say doesn't mean she really is. She might just be acting polite, while silently wishing that the date would hurry up and end, or that you would go away... and never come back.

Quote taken from The SoSuave Guide to Women and Dating, which you can read for FREE.

Poonani Maker

Master Don Juan
Joined
Apr 29, 2007
Messages
4,392
Reaction score
927
Good analysis, agree on that, he surely doesnt know what he is talking about regarding those dynamics.

A male 6 on tinder gets swiped left so much that at some point the algorithm no longer shows him to women let alone being succesful, maybe a male 7 can get a match here and there.
When I go on Tinder and swipe, I'll get a match, but she will NEVER message me. I have to do the messaging. OKCupid, ZERO matches and zero messages - something is wrong or bizarre about that app/site. Bumble, I'll get matches and of course she'll message cause she has too, but it's still like 20% that a message will come. Happn, I have messaged during the summer, and I get matches every now and then. POF, get matches and opening messages every now and then, If I go on. If I make an effort you know Swipe, then I'll get matches and very few messages, except on OKCupid where I get Nothing (do you have to pay or something for her to be able to see/send a message?).
 
Top